Table 4 Summary of laparoscopic technique
From: Laparoscopic versus open approach in gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review
| Reference | Type of dissection | Type of gastrectomy | Retrieved LN | Proximal margin | Distal margin | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L | O | P | L | O | P | L | O | P | |||
| Huang et al. [14] | D2 | DG | 25.81 ± 12.53 | 27.47 ± 0.28 | 0.401 | - | - | ||||
| Zhao et al. [18] | D1,D1 + α, β, D2, D2+ | DG | 33.2 ± 12.5 | 32.8 ± 15.6 | 0.715 | 6.25 ± 2.04 | 6.29 ± 2.11 | 0.805 | 5.68 ± 1.71 | 5.62 ± 1.59 | 0.642 |
| Shuang et al. [17] | D2 | DG | 35 (7–63) | 38 (6–66) | NS | – | – | ||||
| Scatizzi et al. [16] | D2 | DG | 37 (8–89) | 31 (16–60) | 0.174 | – | – | ||||
| Cai et al. [15] | D2 | PG DG TG | 22.98 ± 2.704 | 22.8 ± 2.428 | 0.839 | – | – | ||||
| Chun et al. [20] | D2 | DG | 39.1 ± 15.2 | 39.3 ± 11.2 | 0.971 | 5.0 ± 2.9 | 6.0 ± 3.6 | 0.014 | 6.0 ± 3.4 | 5.4 ± 3.1 | 0.372 |
| Chen et al. [19] | D2 | DG TG | 30.6 ± 10.1 | 30.3 ± 8.6 | 0.786 | – | – | ||||
| Hamabe et al. [21] | D2 | DG TG | 63.7 ± 26.4 | 44.0 ± 18.9 | < 0.0001 | – | – | ||||
| Kim et al. [22] | D2 | TG SG TG | 38.3 ± 14.3 | 41.8 ± 15.3 | 0.1187 | 4.4 ± 3.0 | 4.5 ± 3.1 | 0.8695 | 7.3 ± 4.8 | 7.2 ± 5.4 | 0.9363 |
| Moisan et al. [23] | D1 + α, D1 + β, D2 | TG SG | 35 (9–68) | 39 (12–109) | 0.805 | – | 5.5 (0.3–13.5) | 5.5 (0.3–13.5) | 0.982 | ||
| Gordon et al. [25] | D0, D1, D1 + α, D1 + β, D2, D2+ | DG | 35.92 ± 12.60 | 36.5 ± 14.48 | 0.739 | – | – | ||||
| Bo et al. [24] | – | TG | 35.2 ± 11.7 | 37.4 ± 13.2 | 0.132 | 3.5 ± 1.2 | 3.2 ± 0.9 | 0.517 | – | ||
| Shinohara et al. [27] | D2 | DG PG TG | 45.3 ± 16.9 | 43.8 ± 17.2 | 0.446 | – | – | ||||
| Lin et al. [26] | D2 | TG DG | 30.2 ± 10.1 | 28.0 ± 8.1 | 0.103 | – | – | ||||
| Fang et al. [28] | D2 | TG DG | 32 (8–65) | 36 (12–72) | NS | – | – | ||||
| Qiu et al. [29] | D2 | DG TG | 30.2 ± 12.0 | 28.1 ± 11.8 | 0.484 | – | – | ||||
| Zhang et al. [32] | D2 | DG TG | 20 (16–23) | 21 (17–23) | 0.58 | – | – | ||||
| Wu et al. [31] | D2 | DG PG TG | 19.84 ± 4.7 | 18.04 ± 4.14 | NS | 6.33 ± 1.91 | 6.44 ± 2.04 | 0.621 | 5.73 ± 1.47 | 5.92 ± 1.11 | 0.149 |
| Cui et al. [30] | D2 | PG DG TG | 29.3 ± 11.8 | 30.1 ± 11.4 | 0.574 | – | – | ||||
| Lu et al. [37] | D2 | TG | 18 (17-23) | 19 (16-24) | 0.548 | – | – | ||||
| Hao et al. [33] | D1,D1+,D2, D2+ | DG PG TG | 30.4 ± 13.4 | 28.1 ± 17.1 | 0.43 | 6.15 ± 1.63 | 6.09 ± 1.09 | 0.54 | 5.46 ± 1.74 | 5.40 ± 1.95 | 0.57 |
| Li et al [35] | D2 | DG | 33.7 ± 7.1 | 33.1 ± 7.6 | 0.358 | – | – | ||||
| Zhang et al. [38] | D2 | DG TG | 17 (16–21) | 18 (17–25) | 0.258 | – | – | ||||
| Li et al. [35] | D2 | DG | 24.7 ± 8.3 | 24.6 ± 10.0 | 0.967 | 5.8 (5.0, 6.8) | 5.0 (4.0, 7.5) | 0.476 | 3.0 (2.0, 3.8) | 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) | 0.634 |
| Hu et al. [34] | D2 | DG | 36.1 ± 16.7 | 36.9 ± 16.1 | 0.738 | 4.8 ± 2.3 | 5.2 ± 2.5 | 0.436 | 4.1 ± 2.1 | 4.3 ± 2.5 | 0.239 |
| Zhang et al. [40] | – | DG PG TG | 37 ± 14 | 35 ± 11 | 0.05 | – | – | ||||
| Xu et al. [39] | D2 | DG TG | 6.0 ± 6.9 | 6.4 ± 7.2 | 0.353 | 4.8 ± 2.5 | 4.6 ± 2.4 | 0.354 | 6.6 ± 4.2 | 7.6 ± 4.7 | 0.105 |
| Li et al. [42] | D2 | DG TG | – | – | – | ||||||
| Xu et al. [49] | D2 | DG TG | 21.6 ± 8.6 | 22.4 ± 10.3 | 0.136 | 5.0 ± 2.8 | 5.4 ± 2.9 | 0.066 | 7.2 ± 4.3 | 6.9 ± 4.6 | 0.292 |
| Inokuchi et al. [41] | D2 | DG TG | 39 (14–72) | 38 (14–89) | 0.69 | – | – | ||||
| Shi et al. [44] | D2 | PG DG TG | 31.59 ± 5.87 | 32.18 ± 6.07 | 0.377 | – | – | ||||
| Park et al. [43] | D2 | DG | 37.0 ± 13.4 | 39.7 ± 13.3 | 0.168 | – | – | ||||
| Chan et al. [45] | D2 | TG | 37 (7–77) | 26 (3–95) | < 0.001 | – | – | ||||
| Kinoshita et al. [46] | D1, D1+,D2, D2+ | DG PG TG | 43 (32–56) | 34 (24–44) | < 0.001 | – | – | ||||
| Wang et al. [48] | D2 | DG | 29.5 ± 10.4 | 31.4 ± 12.3 | 0.083 | 5.0 ± 2.2 | 5.3 ± 2.5 | NS | 3.8 ± 2.4 | 3.9 ± 2.7 | NS |
| Lee et al. [47] | D2 | DG | 46.6 ± 17.7 | 46.9 ± 15.9 | 0.741 | 4.6 ± 3.0 | 5.0 ± 3.1 | 0.053 | 4.8 ± 3.2 | 4.8 ± 3.1 | 0.87 |