Skip to main content

Table 2 Clinicopathological features of 18 GCLS patients

From: Postoperative outcomes of gastric carcinoma with lymphoid stroma

Case

Age (yrs)

Sex

Location

Macroscopic type

No. of tumors

Tumor size (mm)

pT stage

pN stage

No. of LN+/LN total

ly

v

pStage

Surgical procedure

1

48

M

U

0-IIc

1

14

1

0

0/45

0

0

I

DG

2

64

M

M

1

1

25

1

0

0/67

0

0

I

DG

3

75

M

L

0-IIc

1

13

1

0

0/54

0

0

I

DG

4

55

M

U

0-IIc

3

24

1

2

4/62

0

0

II

TG

5

42

M

U

2

1

25

1

1

2/31

0

1

II

TG

6

63

M

U

3

1

100

4

1

2/83

2

1

III

TG

7

64

M

U

0-IIc

1

44

1

0

0/56

0

0

I

TG

8

74

F

U

3

1

52

4

1

1/48

1

2

III

TG

9

89

M

M

0-IIc

1

16

1

0

0/25

0

0

I

DG

10

72

M

U

0-IIa

1

20

2

1

2/9

2

2

II

TG

11

76

F

L

2

1

50

1

0

0/52

2

0

I

DG

12

84

M

M

2

1

76

2

2

5/24

3

2

II

DG

13

83

M

U

2

1

20

2

0

0/11

2

1

I

TG

14

80

M

U

0-IIc

1

10

1

0

0/34

0

0

I

PG

15

65

F

M

0-IIa

1

13

1

0

0/52

0

0

I

DG

16

65

M

U

3

1

75

4

3a

9/72

3

1

III

TG

17

70

F

U

3

1

55

4

0

0/133

1

1

II

TG

18

75

M

L

0-IIc

1

65

1

0

0/75

0

0

I

TG

  1. M male, F female, U upper third, M middle third, L lower third, No. number, p pathological, LN lymph node, ly lymphatic invasion, v venous invasion, DG distal gastrectomy, TG total gastrectomy, PG proximal gastrectomy