Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies in the meta-analysis

From: Systematic review of comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer

Study

Year

Country

Study type

Patients (n)

Age

Sex (M/F)

NOS stars

SILS/CLS

SILS/CLS

SILS/CLS

 

 Curro [9]

2012

Italy

R

10/10

60/59

4/6

3/7

6

 Yun [10]

2013

Korea

R

66/93

61/59

33/33

58/35

7

Takemasa [11]

2014

Japan

P

69/69

65/66

31/38

36/33

7

 Suzuki [12]

2016

Japan

R

35/35

68/69

21/14

14/21

7

 Yu [13]

2016

Korea

P

38/92

63/65

21/19

45/47

8

Tokudka [14]

2016

Japan

R

27/36

77/77

16/11

15/21

6

 Chouillard [15]

2016

France

R

336/256

61/65

160//176

128/128

8

 Kim [16]

2017

Korea

R

40/80

66/63

22/28

50/30

7

 Song [17]

2018

China

R

32/32

59/65

16/16

16/16

7

Study

BMI

Previous abdominal surgery (n)

Clinical stage

Anastomosis type

SILS/CLS

SILS/CLS

SILS (I/II/III/IV)

CLS (I/II/III/IV)

 

 Curro [9]

25/26

2/3

NR

NR

End to end

 Yun [10]

23.8/24.2

13/23

22/24/20/0

32/31/30/0

NR

 Takemasa [11]

21.5/22.2

16/19

32/23/14/0

31/21/17/0

End to end

 Suzuki [12]

26.2/25.0

14/12

7/12/16/0

8/10/17/0

NR

 Yu [13]

24.6/24.3

8/31

NR

NR

NR

 Tokudka [14]

23.1/21.9

7/9

NR

NR

End to end

 Chouillard [15]

27/26.2

56/56

NR

NR

End to side

 Kim [16]

23.5/23.4

9/19

17/14/9/0

34/30/16/0

End to side

 Song [17]

22.7/22.8

11/9

9/13/10/0

8/14/10/0

End to side

  1. F female, M male, NR No record, R retrospective nonrandomized controlled trials, P prospective comparative nonrandomized trial, SILS single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, CLS conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, NOS stars modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale