Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included literature

From: Comparison of efficacy of robotic surgery, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in the treatment of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis

Author

Public year

Study year

Location

Stage

Type of tumor

Residual disease #

Group

N

Age, years*

BMI (kg/m2)*

Follow-up, months

Ye et al. [26]

2017

2014.11–2015.11

China

I

NA

NA

R

9

45.7 ± 13.8

24.4 ± 4.4

12–24

L

10

NA

NA

12–24

O

8

NA

NA

12–24

Gallotta et al. [23]

2016

2014.10–2016.4

Italy

IA–IIIB

NA

NA

R

32

49 (32–76)

24 (17–54)

Median 38

L

64

49 (27–73)

24 (19–41)

Median 38

Bellia et al. [19]

2016

2006–2014

France, Italy

IA–IIIC

Epithelial

NA

R

16

47.3 ± 12.3

22.3 ± 2.9

21.2 ± 12.7

L

23

49.4 ± 15.9

25.8 ± 6.5

18.5 ± 8.6

Chen et al. [21]

2015

2007.9–2015.2

Taiwan

Recurrent

NA

NA

R

8

56.3 ± 12.4

25.9 ± 5.6

NA

L

12

NA

O

15

NA

Magrina et al. [24]

2011

2004.3–2008.12

USA

I–IV

Epithelial

21

R

25

65 (23–82)

25.1 (18.7–35.8)

30

25

L

27

59 (3–85)

23.7 (17.6–37.7)

54

67

O

119

67 (19–90)

24.9 (16.6–38.5)

42

Feuer et al. [22]

2013

2008–2012

USA

I–IV

Epithelial

46

R

63

59.8 ± 11.8

27.1 ± 7.3

15.5 ± 12.3

13

O

26

55.7 ± 11.7

28.2 ± 6.1

23.5 ± 14.0

Magrina et al. [25]

2013

2006.1–2010.12

USA

Recurrent

NA

7

R

10

66.0 (45.0–83.0)

22.6 (19.7–25.5)

NA

8

L

9

57.0 (45.0–74.0)

24.5 (19.9–2.7)

NA

24

O

33

62.0 (39.0–80.0)

25.9 (18.5–41.2)

NA

Chen et al. [20]

2016

2005–2014.

Taiwan

IA–IIIC

Epithelial

44

R

44

44.3 ± 12.3

22.3 ± 2.7

13.1 ± 5.3

21

L

21

43.8 ± 10.3

24.1 ± 4.9

29.6 ± 19.0

72

O

73

49.2 ± 12.8

22.9 ± 4.2

26.7 ± 17.7

  1. R robot, L laparoscopic, O laparotomy, BMI body mass index, NOS Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, NA data are not available
  2. #Number of complete debulking
  3. *Mean ± SD/median (range)