Skip to main content

Table 2 The risk of bias of the included studies

From: Short-term outcomes of traction-assisted versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies

Author

Random sequence generation

Allocation concealment

Blinding of participants and personnel

Blinding of outcome assessment

Incomplete outcome data

Selective reporting

Other bias

Ahn et al. [18] 2013

Low risk

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Ritsuno et al. [21] 2014

Unclear

Low risk

Unclear

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Koike et al. [19] 2015

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

High risk

Mori et al. [20] 2017

Unclear

Low risk

Unclear

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear

Yamasaki et al. [22] 2018

Low risk

Unclear

High risk

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear

Yoshida et al. [23] 2018

Low risk

High risk

High risk

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear

Ban et al. [24] 2018

Low risk

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

High risk