Skip to main content

Table 5 Logistic regression model for CR-POPF occurrence in 164 matched patients

From: Modified duct-to-mucosa versus conventional pancreaticoenterostomy for pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching analysis

Variable

Univariate

Multivariate

With CR-POPF, n (%)

Without CR-POPF, n (%)

P value

Relative risk (95% CI)

P value

PE approach

  

0.034

 

0.156

 End-to-side

8 (9.8)

74 (90.2)

 

1

 

 Duct-to-mucosa

1 (1.2)

81 (98.8)

 

0.19 (0.02–1.88)

 

BMI (kg/m2)

  

0.090

 

0.030

 < 24

4 (3.2)

120 (96.8)

 

1

 24–28

5 (13.2)

33 (86.8)

 

15.75 (2.04–121.40)

0.008

 > 28

0 (0.0)

2 (100.0)

 

0.00 (0.00–0.00)

1.000

Diabetes

  

< 0.001

 

0.005

 No

3 (2.2)

132 (97.8)

 

1

 

 Yes

6 (20.7)

23 (79.3)

 

14.01 (2.20–89.19)

 

Final diagnosis

  

0.936

 

0.791

 Pancreatic cancer

4 (5.3)

71 (94.7)

 

1

 

 Other pathologic findings

5 (5.6)

84 (94.4)

 

0.71 (0.06–8.99)

 

Pancreas texture

  

0.707

 

0.817

 Firm

6 (5.0)

113 (95.0)

 

1

 

 Soft

3 (6.7)

42 (93.3)

 

0.75 (0.07–8.38)

 

Pancreatic duct diameter

  

0.213

 

0.114

 3 mm

6 (4.5)

128 (95.5)

 

1

 

 < 3 mm

3 (10.0)

27 (90.0)

 

5.39 (0.67–43.63)

 

Neoplastic

    

0.021

 No

2 (28.6)

5 (71.4)

0.049

1

 

 Yes

7 (4.5)

150 (95.5)

 

0.03 (0.00–0.59)