Skip to main content

Table 5 Logistic regression model for CR-POPF occurrence in 164 matched patients

From: Modified duct-to-mucosa versus conventional pancreaticoenterostomy for pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching analysis

Variable Univariate Multivariate
With CR-POPF, n (%) Without CR-POPF, n (%) P value Relative risk (95% CI) P value
PE approach    0.034   0.156
 End-to-side 8 (9.8) 74 (90.2)   1  
 Duct-to-mucosa 1 (1.2) 81 (98.8)   0.19 (0.02–1.88)  
BMI (kg/m2)    0.090   0.030
 < 24 4 (3.2) 120 (96.8)   1
 24–28 5 (13.2) 33 (86.8)   15.75 (2.04–121.40) 0.008
 > 28 0 (0.0) 2 (100.0)   0.00 (0.00–0.00) 1.000
Diabetes    < 0.001   0.005
 No 3 (2.2) 132 (97.8)   1  
 Yes 6 (20.7) 23 (79.3)   14.01 (2.20–89.19)  
Final diagnosis    0.936   0.791
 Pancreatic cancer 4 (5.3) 71 (94.7)   1  
 Other pathologic findings 5 (5.6) 84 (94.4)   0.71 (0.06–8.99)  
Pancreas texture    0.707   0.817
 Firm 6 (5.0) 113 (95.0)   1  
 Soft 3 (6.7) 42 (93.3)   0.75 (0.07–8.38)  
Pancreatic duct diameter    0.213   0.114
 3 mm 6 (4.5) 128 (95.5)   1  
 < 3 mm 3 (10.0) 27 (90.0)   5.39 (0.67–43.63)  
Neoplastic      0.021
 No 2 (28.6) 5 (71.4) 0.049 1  
 Yes 7 (4.5) 150 (95.5)   0.03 (0.00–0.59)