Skip to main content

Table 4 Logistic regression model for CR-POPF occurrence in 233 unmatched patients

From: Modified duct-to-mucosa versus conventional pancreaticoenterostomy for pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching analysis

Variable

Univariate

Multivariate

With CR-POPF, n (%)

Without CR-POPF, n (%)

P value

Relative risk (95% CI)

P value

PE approach

  

< 0.001

 

0.009

 End-to-side

17 (15.6)

92 (84.4)

 

1

 

 Duct-to-mucosa

1 (0.8)

123 (99.2)

 

0.11 (0.02–0.57)

 

BMI (kg/m2)

  

< 0.001

 

< 0.001

 < 24

5 (3.0)

161 (97.0)

 

Ref.

 24–28

6 (10.9)

49 (89.1)

 

11.89 (2.14–65.94)

0.005

 > 28

7 (58.3)

5 (41.7)

 

49.39 (5.20–469.19)

< 0.001

Diabetes

  

< 0.001

 

0.001

 No

6 (3.2)

181 (96.8)

 

1

 

 Yes

12 (26.1)

34 (73.9)

 

10.54 (2.55–43.61)

 

Final diagnosis

  

0.016

 

0.324

 Pancreatic cancer

6 (4.3)

134 (95.7)

 

1

 

 Other pathologic findings

12 (12.9)

81 (87.1)

 

2.24 (0.45–11.10)

 

Pancreas texture

  

0.018

 

0.480

 Firm

8 (5.0)

153 (95.0)

 

1

 

 Soft

10 (13.9)

62 (86.1)

 

1.81 (0.35–9.45)

 

Pancreatic duct diameter

  

0.029

 

0.021

 3 mm

10 (5.4)

174 (94.6)

 

1

 

 < 3 mm

8 (16.3)

41 (83.7)

 

6.72 (1.33–33.88)

 

Neoplastic

  

0.175

 

0.865

 No

2 (20.0)

8 (80.0)

 

1

 

 Yes

16 (7.2)

207 (92.8)

 

0.73 (0.02–26.69)