Skip to main content

Table 3 The relationship between PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological characteristics in subgroup analysis

From: Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Subgroup analysis

No. of studies

No. of patients

Experimental group: positive/total

Control group: positive/total

OR

95%CI

P value

Heterogeneity (I2), %

Begg’s test (P value)

Egger’s test (P value)

Gender

9

3706

Male

Female

0.92

0.79–1.07

0.29

0

0.917

0.639

898/1852

1018/1854

The situation of primary tumor

7

2809

T3+T4

T1+T2

1.15

0.68–1.95

0.60

70

0.764

0.115

1018/2176

347/633

The involvement of regional lymph nodes

6

2652

N1+N2

N0

1.32

0.84–2.09

0.23

74

0.060

0.012

558/1225

729/1427

Stage

6

2064

III+IV

I+II

1.77

1.41–2.23

P < 0.00001

23

0.452

0.512

594/936

659/1128

Vascular invasion

6

2052

Positive

Negative

1.12

0.72–1.75

0.62

63

0.133

0.090

201/564

491/1488

Tumor location

6

3133

Left

Right

0.86

0.53–1.40

0.55

82

0.452

0.283

916/1873

711/1260

Microsatellite instability

4

2012

MSI-H

MSI-L+MSS

0.95

0.46–1.97

0.89

84

1.000

0.347

223/362

1012/1650

Lymphatic invasion

4

723

Positive

Negative

3.49

1.54–7.90

0.003

73

1.000

0.764

122/280

83/443

Tumor differentiation

4

1862

Poor

Well to moderate

1.90

0.55–6.63

0.31

88

0.734

0.292

108/156

1057/1706

Mucinous properties

3

1563

Mucinous

Other

0.94

0.42–2.10

0.88

56

34/108

573/1455

Grade

3

1562

III

I+II

0.66

0.42–1.03

0.07

52

86/239

569/1323