Skip to main content

Table 1 Basic characteristics of included studies

From: Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author, year

Country

No.

Stage

Follow-up

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy

Curative surgical resection

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy no.

PD-L1 (%)

HR

Cutoff for positive

Enkhbat, 2018 [15]

Japan

116

II–III

52 months (mean)

NA

YES

57

52/116

3.873

Score > 3 (intensity + area)

Masugi, 2016 [35]

America

450

I–IV

> 5 years

NA

YSE

NA

121/450

1.124

Score = 1 (intensity)

117/450

0.980

Score = 2 (intensity)

139/450

1.042

Score = 3 (intensity)

26/450

1.370

Score = 4 (intensity)

Saigusa, 2016 [16]

Japan

90

I–IV

> 6 months

YES

YES

90

36/90

2.452

Score ≥ 2 (intensity)

Zhu, 2015 [36]

China

120

NA

39 months (mean)

NA

YES

NA

28/120

0.692

Score > 4 (intensity + area)

Liang, 2014 [17]

China

185

I–IV

> 5 years

NA

YES

NA

102/185

1.740

Score > 4 (intensity + area)

Droeser, 2014 [37]

Switzerland

1420

NA

> 5 years

NA

YES

NA

495/1420

0.92

Subjective evaluation

Hamada, 2017 [20]

America

384

I–IV

> 5 years

NA

YES

NA

211/384

1.20

Score ≥ 2 (intensity + area)

Lee, 2018 [18]

Korea

336

I–IV

52 months (mean)

NA

YES

NOT

15/336

3.785

Area > 1%

Li, 2016 [19]

China

276

NA

61 months (mean)

NA

YES

189

138/276

1.048

Score > 4 (intensity + area)

Miller, 2017 [38]

Australia

104

III

82.5 months (mean)

NA

YES

89

60/104

1.00

Subjective evaluation

  1. NA not available, NOT no patients underwent, mean average follow-up time is provided only, intensity + area the score involved staining intensity and staining range, intensity the score involved staining intensity only