Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies in the meta-analysis

From: Systematic review of single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer

 

Patients (n)

BMI

Tumor size (cm)

Sex (M/F)

Age

Tumor location

Score

First author

Year

Study area

Type

SILS/CLS

SILS

CLS

SILS

CLS

SILS

CLS

SILS

CLS

 

Liu [7]

2016

China

NRCT

16/32

21.9

22.4

3.6

3.6

13/3

23/9

56.4

55.6

Sigmoid and rectum

5

Hong [8]

2016

China

RCT

43/43

NR

NR

NR

NR

23/20

26/17

52.3

54.1

Rs

3

Bulut [9]

2015

Denmark

RCT

20/20

24

24

2.5

4.0

12/8

12/8

69

73

Rectum

3

Kim [10]

2014

Korea

NRCT

67/49

23.1

23.5

4.3

5.3

44/23

28/21

63.8

61.3

Rectum

7

Levic [11]

2014

Denmark

NRCT

36/194

23.8

25

NR

NR

17/19

133/61

69

68

Rectum

8

Tei [12]

2018

Japan

NRCT

44/49

23.6

22

3.9

4.1

29/15

29/20

66

63

Rectum

8

Kwag [13]

2013

Korea

NRCT

24/48

24.4

24

2.6

3.4

9/15

18/30

59.5

59

Sigmoid

7

Park [14]

2012

Korea

NRCT

37/54

24.7

23.9

NR

NR

21/16

26/28

63.8

59.9

Sigmoid

7

Nerup [15]

2018

Denmark

NRCT

12/41

23.5

25

NR

NR

7/5

13/28

76

69

Rectum

6

  1. F female, M male, NR no record, RCT randomized controlled trials, NRCT non-randomized controlled trials, SILS single-port laparoscopic surgery, CLS conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery, Rs rectosigmoid junction cancer