Skip to main content

Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with OS and DFS

From: Safety and efficacy of dehydrated ethanol soaking of the operative field in the treatment of spontaneous hepatocellular carcinoma rupture

Univariate analysis

 

Overall survival

Disease-free survival

Variable

Hazard ratio (95% CI)

P value

Hazard ratio(95% CI)

P value

Age (≤ 47.0 vs. > 47.0)

1.045 (0.494–2.210)

0.908

0.902 (0.442–1.840)

0.777

Gender (female vs. male)

1.618 (0.549–4.767)

0.382

1.076 (0.375–3.089)

0.892

HBsAg (negative vs. positive)

0.756 (0.281–2.029)

0.578

1.254 (0.481–3.268)

0.643

AFP, IU/mL (≤ 400 vs. > 400)

1.000 (0.181–4.645)

0.345

1.669 (0.443–6.289)

0.276

AST, IU/L (≤ 40 vs. > 40)

1.005 (0.996–1.014)

0.257

1.004 (0.997–1.011)

0.229

ALT, IU/L (≤ 40 vs. > 40)

1.004 (0.993–1.015)

0.453

1.001 (0.990–1.012)

0.864

Child-Pugh classification(A vs. B and C)

0.458 (0.062–3.402)

0.445

0.646 (0.152–2.732)

0.552

Tumor size, cm (≤ 10 vs.> 10)

1.062 (0.446–2.528)

0.892

0.690 (0.298–1.598)

0.386

Tumor number (single vs .multiple)

0.849 (0.318–2.267)

0.744

0.571 (0.218–1.493)

0.253

Liver cirrhosis(no vs. yes)

0.819 (0.326–2.059)

0.671

0.605 (0.267–1.370)

0.228

Organ invasion(no vs. yes)

1.158 (0.511–2.625)

0.726

0.912 (0.508–2.298)

0.841

Vascular invasion (no vs. yes)

1.339 (0.535–3.355)

0.533

1.074 (0.504–2.288)

0.854

Pre-operation TACE (no vs. yes)

1.228 (0.415–3.633)

0.711

0.722 (0.251–2.073)

0.544

Type of treatment (DAW vs.DW)

1.828 (0.877–3.810)

0.107

1.951 (1.030–3.693)

0.040

Multivariate analyses

    

Type of treatment

N.A.

0.206

N.A.

0.331

  1. Multivariate analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used. Variables were adopted for their prognostic significance by univariate analysis (P < 0.05)
  2. CI confidence interval, N.A. not applicable