Table 5 Factors associated with false-negative detection of SLN
From: The efficacy of sentinel lymph node mapping with indocyanine green in cervical cancer
Factors | Group 1, n (%) | Group 2, n (%) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
Tumor size | |||
< 4 cm | 65 (80.25) | 3 (33.33) | 0.0019 |
≥ 4 cm | 16 (19.75) | 6 (66.67) | |
Previous LEEP | |||
No | 39 (48.15) | 1 (11.11) | 0.0339 |
Yes | 42 (51.85) | 8 (88.89) | |
Parametrium invasion | |||
No | 72 (88.89) | 3 (33.33) | < 0.0001 |
Yes | 9 (11.11) | 6 (66.67) | |
Depth of invasion | |||
< 50% | 42(51.85) | 0(0) | 0.003 |
≥ 50% | 39(48.15) | 9(100) | |
Vagina extension | |||
No | 73 (90.12) | 6 (66.67) | 0.0415 |
Yes | 8 (9.88) | 3 (33.33) | |
Resention margin involvement | |||
NO | 80 (98.77) | 9 (100) | > 0.999 |
Yes | 1 (1.23) | 0 | |
FIGO staging | |||
IA1 | 6 (7.41) | 0 | 0.5493 |
IA2 | 6 (7.41) | 0 | |
IB1 | 51 (62.96) | 5 (55.56) | |
IB2 | 13 (14.28) | 3 (33.33) | |
IIA | 5 (6.17) | 1 (11.11) | |