Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in this meta-analysis
From: Is ERAS effective and safe in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma? A meta-analysis
Author | Year | Sample size FTS/conventional | Age (years) FTS/conventional | Gender (n, M:F) FTS/conventional | BMI (kg/m2) FTS/conventional | Type of surgery (n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hu et al. [13] | 2012 | 19/22 | 59/62.5(median) | (10:9)/(10:12) | 22.94 ± 2.23/22.99 ± 2.24 | Distal gastrectomy(41) |
Kim et al. [14] | 2012 | 22/22 | 52.64/57.45(mean) | (13:9)/(15:7) | 23.40 ± 3.17/23.77 ± 3.54 | Distal gastrectomy(44) |
Abdikarim et al. [15] | 2015 | 30/31 | 63/62(median) | (21:9)/(20:11) | NR | Distal gastrectomy(44)/total gastrectomy(17) |
Liu et al. [16] | 2016 | 21/21 | 69.2/70.3(mean) | (10:11)/(12:9) | 21.5 ± 2.0/21.9 ± 2.3 | Proximal gastrectomy (10)/distal gastrectomy(21)/total gastrectomy(11) |
Fang et al. [17] | 2016 | 33/30 | 61.12/61.53(mean) | (15:18)/(16:14) | NR | NR |
Xia et al. [18] | 2016 | 73/76 | 61/63(median) | (48:25)/(50:26) | NR | NR |