Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included systematic reviews

From: Performance of Harmonic devices in surgical oncology: an umbrella review of the evidence

Review (year)

Search period

Intervention

Comparisons

Surgical procedure

Outcomes

No. of RCTs

Methodological quality of RCTs†

Population: gastric cancer patients

Sun (2015) [24]

June 2014

Ultrasonic dissection

Conventional electrocautery

Gastrectomy with D1/D2 LND

OR time; blood loss; post-op abdominal drainage; morbidity and mortality; post-op hospital stay; total cost

5

Low RoB

Cheng (2015) [12]

September 2013

Harmonic surgical devices

Conventional techniques

OR time; blood loss; post-op drainage volume; post-op hospital stay; blood transfusion; post-op complications

10

Moderate to low RoB

Chen (2014) [23]

September 2012

Ultrasonic scalpel

Conventional techniques

OR time; post-op complications; blood loss; abdominal drainage; post-op hospital stay; blood transfusion; GI function recovery days; no. dissected lymph nodes

7

Low quality‡

Population: breast cancer patients

Huang (2015) [13]

June 2015

Harmonic scalpel

Electrocautery dissection

Modified radical mastectomy

Post-op drainage; seroma formation; blood loss; OR time; wound complications

7*

Low to moderate quality‡

Cheng (2016) [21]

January 1998 to May 2014

Harmonic technology

Conventional techniques

Mastectomy and BCS with LND

OR time; blood loss; chest wall drainage; post-op hospital stay; total complications; seroma and hematoma formation; wound infection; necrosis; ecchymosis

12

Moderate to low RoB

Currie (2012) [22]

2011

Ultrasonic dissection

Electrocautery dissection

Mastectomy ± LND

Total post-op drainage; seroma formation; blood loss; OR time; wound complications

6

Low to moderate quality‡

Population: oral, head, and neck cancer patients

Ren (2015) [14]

2014

Harmonic scalpel

Conventional hemostasis

Neck dissection with LND

OR time; blood loss; post-op drainage; hospital stay

7

Moderate to low RoB

Population: colon cancer patients

Allaix (2016) [28]

January 1999 to January 2016

Energy sources

Conventional electrosurgery

Laparoscopic colorectal resection

Quantitative analysis not performed

4**

Not assessed

Di Lorenzo (2012) [29]

1990 to June 2011

Ultrasonic energy

Radiofrequency

Quantitative analysis for comparison of Harmonic devices vs. conventional techniques not performed

5***

Not assessed

Tou (2011) [30]

March 2010

Energy sources

Conventional electrosurgery

OR time; blood loss; complications; conversion to open surgery; post-op hospital stay; total cost

6

Low RoB

  1. RoB risk of bias, OR time operative time, Post-op post-operative, LND lymph node dissection (lymphadenectomy), BCS breast-conserving surgery
  2. †Methodological quality of included RCTs based on Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool according to the information provided by published SRs
  3. ‡Used Jadad scale and/or Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment of included RCTs
  4. *Included four prospective comparative studies in addition to the seven RCTs
  5. **Included three cohort studies in addition to four RCTs. Note that of the four RCTs, three compared HS and conventional
  6. ***Included two prospective and three retrospective comparative studies in addition to five RCTs. Note that of the five RCTs, three compared HS and conventional