Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of patients group with pelvic lymph node surgery

From: Role of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in abandoned radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer

 

Tumor removal and/or pelvic biopsy

N = 19 (57.6%)

Pelvic lymphadenectomy

N = 14 (42.4%)

p

Countrya

 Mexico (INCan)

10 (52.6)

2 (14.3)

0.02

 Colombia (ICLA)

9 (47.4)

12 (85.7)

Age (years)b

45 (35-53)

45.5 (40-54.3)

0.55

BMI b

27.4 (25.3–31.1)

24.6 (22.4–25.4)

0.01

Histologya

 Squamous

9 (47.4)

9 (64.3)

0.22

 Adenocarcinoma

5 (26.3)

5 (35.7)

 Adenosquamous

3 (15.8)

0

 Others

2 (10.5)

0

Initial clinical stagea

 IB1

18 (94.7)

13 (92.9)

0.82

 IB2

1 (5.3)

1 (7.1)

Tumor size (cm)b

3 (1.6–4)

3 (2–4)

0.63

Tumor gradea

 Well-differentiated

4 (21.1)

7 (50)

0.05

 Moderately differentiated

7 (36.8)

6 (42.9)

 Poorly differentiated

8 (42.1)

1 (7.1)

LVSIa

3 (15.8)

2 (14.3)

0.74

Systematic PALa

1 (5.3)

5 (35.7)

0.062

BPRa

11 (57.9)

3 (21.4)

0.073

PR positive

17 (89.5)

12 (85.7)

NS

Surgical time (min)b

150 (120–190)

165 (103.8–198.8)

0.69

Blood loss (mm)b

100 (70–250)

100 (57.5–212.5)

0.78

Blood transfusiona

1 (0.05)

1 (0.07)

0.82

Others complicationsa

1 (0.05)

1 (0.07)

0.82

Hospital stay (days)b

2 (2–2)

2 (2–3.3)

0.19

Neoadjuvant treatment term (weeks)b

10 (7.5–14)

8.8 (8.1–11)

0.57

Recurrencea

7 (26.8)

2 (14.3)

0.15

 Local

1 (14.3)

0

 

 Regional

6 (85.7)

2 (100)

 

 Distance

0

0

 
  1. Confidence interval 95%
  2. BMI body mass index, Mod moderate, LVSI lymphovascular space involvement, PAL para-aortic lymphadenectomy, BPR biopsy or pelvic lymph node removal, PR pathology report, NS not significant
  3. a N (relative frequency)
  4. bMedian (interquartile range)