Skip to main content

Table 4 Complication rates of RAPN versus OPN

From: The comparison of perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted and open partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study (OPN/RAPN)

Patients

Overall complication (%)

Intracomplication (%)

Postcomplication (%)

Clavien1 (%)

Clavien2 (%)

Clavien3 (%)

Clavien4 (%)

Clavien5 (%)

Minor (%)

Major (%)

Wu et al. [10]

94/51

18 (19.1)/14 (25.9)

1 (1.1)/1 (2.0)

17 (18.1)/13 (25.5)

16 (17.0)/12a

1 (1.1)/1 (2.0)b

16 (17.0)/12 (23.5)

1 (1.1)/1 (2.0)

Vittori et al. [11]

198/105

58 (29.3)/12 (11.4)

10 (5.1)/3 (2.9)

48 (24.2)/9 (8.6)

3 (1.5)/1 (1.1)

21 (10.6)/4 (3.8)

15 (7.6)/1 (1.0)

3 (1.5)/0 (0.0)

NA/NA

24 (12.1)/5 (4.8)

18 (9.1)/1 (1.0)

Masson-Lecomte et al. [16]

58/42

8 (13.8)/4 (9.6)

NA/NA

8 (13.8)/4 (9.6)

0 (0.0)/2 (4.8)

6 (10.3)/2 (4.8)

2 (3.4)/0 (0.0)

NA/NA

NA/NA

6 (10.3)/4 (9.5)

2 (3.4)/0 (0.0)

Ficarra et al. [17]

200/200

46 (23.0)/29 (14.5)

3 (1.5)/1 (0.5)

43 (21.5)/28 (14.0)

34 (17.0)/19 (9.5)a

7 (3.5)/8 (4.0)

2 (1.0)/1 (0.5)

NA/NA

34 (17.0)/19 (9.5)

9 (4.5)/9 (4.5)

Kim et al. [24]

83/67

16 (19.3)/10 (14.9)

NA/NA

16 (19.3)/10 (14.9)

1 (1.2)/0 (0.0)

13 (15.7)/7 (10.5)

0 (0.0)/2 (3.0)

1 (1.2)/1 (1.5)

1 (1.2)/0 (0)

14 (16.9)/7 (10.4)

2 (2.4)/3 (4.5)

Lucas et al. [18]

54/27

11 (20.4)/5 (18.5)

4 (7.4)/1 (3.7)

7 (13.0)/4 (14.8)

5 (9.3)/1 (3.7)

1 (1.9)/2(7.4)

1 (1.9)/0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)/1 (3.7)

NA/NA

6 (11.1)/3 (11.1)

1 (1.9)/1 (3.7)

Han et al. [6]

354/147

28 (7.9)/5 (3.4)

NA/NA

28 (7.9)/5 (3.4)

4 (1.1)/2 (1.4)

17 (4.8)/1 (0.7)

7 (2.0)/2 (0.2)c

NA/NA

21 (5.9)/3 (2.0)

7 (2.0)/2 (0.2)

Oh et al. [19]

100/100

11 (11.0)/14 (14.0)

3 (3.0)/4 (4.0)

8 (8.0)/10 (10.0)

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

Lee et al. [9]

234/69

46 (19.6)/9 (13.0)

10 (4.3)/3 (4.3)

36 (15.4)/6 (8.7)

20 (8.5)/3 (4.3)

5 (2.1)/3 (4.3)

11 (4.7)/0 (0.0)

NA/NA

NA/NA

25 (10.7)/6 (8.7)

11 (4.7)/0 (0.0)

Alemozaffar et al. [7]

25/25

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

Simhan et al. 1 2012 [12]

136/81

68 (50.0)/29 (35.8)

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

Simhan et al. 2 2012 [12]

54/10

35 (64.8)/8 (80.0)

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

Zargar et al. 1 2014 [20]

33/30

16 (48.5)/10 (33.3)

0 (0.0)/1 (3.3)

16 (48.5)/9 (30.0)

6 (18.2)/3 (10)

3 (9.1)/4 (13.3)

3 (9.1)/2 (6.7)

4 (12.1)/0 (0.0)

NA/NA

9 (27.3)/7 (23.3)

7 (13.5)/2 (6.7)

Zargar et al. 2 2014 [20]

52/10

21 (40.4)/5 (50.0)

1 (1.9)/1 (10.0)

20 (38.5)/4 (40.0)

10 (19.2)/0 (0)

4 (7.7)/0 (0.0)

3 (5.8)/1 (10.0)

3 (5.8)/3 (30.0)

NA/NA

14 (26.9)/0 (0.0)

6 (11.5)/4 (40.0)

Boylu et al. [8]

20/46

4 (20)/8 (17.3)

0 (0.0)/0 (0.0)

4 (20)/8 (17.3)

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

Mano et al. [22]

190/63

25 (13)/4 (6)

NA/NA

25 (13)/4 (6)

14 (7)/4 (6)a

11 (6)/0 (0)

0 (0.0)/0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)/0 (0.0)

14 (7)/4 (6)

11 (6)/0 (0)

Miyake et al. [23]

15/16

3 (20.0)/1(8.3)

NA/NA

3 (20.0)/1(8.3)

1 (6.7)/0 (0)a

2 (13.3)/1 (8.3)b

1 (6.7)/0 (0)

2 (13.3)/1 (8.3)

Webb et al. [21]

21/14

1 (4.7)/1 (7.14)

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

NA/NA

  1. NA not available
  2. aClavien 1 and 2 complications
  3. bClavien 3–5 complications
  4. cClavien 3 and 4 complications were merged as one group for discussion in the original data sources