Skip to main content

Table 2 Patient and therapy parameter, tumor characteristics, and follow-up data

From: Anorectal malignant melanoma: curative abdominoperineal resection: patient selection with 18F-FDG-PET/CT

 

Patient 1

Patient 2

Patient 3

Patient 4

Patient 5

Patient 6

Age (years)

66

63

54

67

73

68

Gender

Male

Male

Female

Female

Female

Female

Diagnosis before abdominoperineal resection

      

 S100 protein in serum (normal range < 0.1 μg/l)

0.079

0.301

0.049

0.199

0.039

0.050

 Preoperative biopsy

Yes

Yes

Yes

 Previous local excision

Yes

Yes

Yes

 

Therapy

      

 Type of abdominoperineal resection (APR)

APR

ELAPR

ELAPR

ELAPR

lap. ELAPR

lap. ELAPR

 Intention for abdominoperineal resection

Curative

Palliative

Curative

Palliative

Palliative

Curative

 Time interval between diagnosis and APR (months)

3

1

3

2

13

2

 Adjuvant/additive therapy

DTIC

1. Ipilimumab

DTIC

1. Radiation

Ipilimumab (1 cycle)

2. Nivolumab

2. DTIC

3. Ipilimumab

Tumor characteristics, histopathology/immunostaining

      

 Tumor stage

I

IV

II

IV

III

III

 Tumor localization referring to the dentate line

Above DL

Overlapping zones

On and above DL (multifocal)

DL

DL

Above DL

 Tumor diameter (cm)

0.9

11

0.5 + 0.4 + 0.4

10.5

<1

10,9

 Depth of infiltration (mm)

<3

15

4

All layers

3

All layers

 Negative resection margin (R0)

Yes

Yes (<1 mm)

Yes

Yes

Yes (marginal)

Yes

 Amelanotic melanoma

Yes

No

No

Yes

No

No

 S100 protein

Positive

Positive

 Melan-A

Positive

Positive

Positive

Mutation analysis

      

 KIT

Wild–type

Wild–type

Wild–type

Wild–type

Wild–type

 BRAF

Wild–type

Wild–type

Wild–type

Wild–type

 NRAS

Wild–type

Wild–type

Wild–type

Follow up (months)

102

6

60

10

18

18

Local recurrence

No

Yes

No

No

Yes

No

Time interval to abdominoperineal resection (months)

1

3

Metachronous lymph node metastasis

No

ns

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

 Mediastinum

Yes

Yes

 Perirectal

yes

Time interval to abdominoperineal resection (months)

42

3

5

Metachronous distant metastasis

No

ns

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

 Lung/pleura

ns

Yes

Yes

No

 Liver

No

Yes

Yes

No

 Peritoneum

ns

No

No

Yes

No

 Bone

ns

No

No

Yes

No

 Soft tissue

ns

No

No

Yes

No

 Brain

ns

No

No

Yes

No

Time interval to abdominoperineal resection (months)

21

3

12

Health status at follow-up time interval to abdominoperineal resection (months)

Disease-free

Dead 6

Slowly progressive disease

Dead 10

Dead 18

Disease-free

  1. Before surgery, elevated serum levels of S-100 were measured only in patients with distant metastasis (stage IV). In all patients, the tumor origin was on or slightly above the dentate line. In patient 2, the tumor invades the anal canal. And, in patient 3, the ARMM was found at several localizations around the dentate line. During the first surgery, clear resection margins (R0) were achieved in all six patients. In patients 2 and 5, the resection margins were just barely R0. In patient 5, primarily, a local excision was performed. While in this patient multiple local recurrences were removed by local procedures over a time period of several months, also an LNM in the mesorectum was detected in the course. Consequently, laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection was carried out for local control. However, at this time, the tumor mass was not removable in total (R1). Patient 3 shows an atypical course of ARMM with a slowly progressive disease for more than 5 years
  2. APR abdominoperineal resection, ELAPR extralevator abdominoperineal resection, lap. ELAPR laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal resection, DTIC dacarbacin, DL dentate line, ns not specified