Skip to main content

Table 2 The statistic analyses of 29 pelvic GCT patients basing on the location group

From: Surgical treatment for pelvic giant cell tumor: a multi-center study

Categories

Type Ia

Type IIa

Type IIIa

Total

p

Number, n (%)

10 (34.5)

11 (37.9)

8 (27.6)

29 (100)

Age, year, means (SD)

37.2 (9.3)

36.8 (7.9)

45.1 (9.5)

39.2 (9.3)

0.106

Age group, n (%)

    

0.175

 <20

0 (0)

1 (9.1)

0 (0)

1 (3.4)

 

 20~29

1 (10.0)

0 (0)

1 (12.5)

2 (6.9)

 

 30~39

6 (60.0)

5 (45.5)

1 (12.5)

12 (41.4)

 

 40~49

1 (10.0)

5 (45.5)

3 (37.5)

9 (31.0)

 

 ≥50

2 (20.0)

0 (0)

3 (37.5)

5 (17.2)

 

Sex, n (%)

    

0.160

 Male

3 (30.0)

5 (45.5)

6 (75.0)

14 (48.3)

 

 Female

7 (70.0)

6 (54.5)

2 (25.0)

15 (51.7)

 

Treatment, n (%)

    

0.691

 S (IL)

2 (20.0)

4 (36.4)

2 (25.0)

8 (34.5)

 

 S (W)

8 (80.0)

7 (63.6)

6 (75.0)

21 (31.0)

 

Follow-up, months, means (SD)

62.2 (38.0)

75.5 (59.9)

38.3 (15.3)

59.0 (42.7)

0.215

Recurrence, n (%)

    

0.065

 Exist

0 (0)

3 (27.3)

0 (0)

3 (10.3)

 

 None

10 (100)

8 (72.7)

8 (100)

26 (89.7)

 

Complication, n (%)

    

0.010

 Exist

1 (10.0)

6 (54.5)

0 (0)

7 (24.1)

 

 None

9 (90.0)

5 (45.5)

8 (100)

22 (75.9)

 

MSTS, means (SD)

23.6 (2.4)

20.2 (4.3)

25.5 (2.3)

22.8 (3.8)

0.005

  1. S (IL) intralesional curettage, S (W) wide resection
  2. aAccording to the classification system of Enneking and Dunham