Skip to main content

Table 2 Oncological outcomes of included studies

From: Laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for elderly patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Country

Group

Tumor stage

Extent of LND

Number of retrieved lymph nodes

Length of follow-up

Prognostic outcomes

EGC/AGC

D1/D1+/D2

Yasuda

Japan

LG

44/1

45/0/0

NR

NR

NR

  

OG

24/4

28/0/0

NR

NR

NR

Mochiki

Japan

LG

29/1

0/30/0

NR

Median 40 m

5-year OS rate 95.7 %, 5-year DFS rate 96 %

  

OG

14/2

0/16/0

NR

NR

NR

Meng

China

LG

38/78

0/0/116

29 ± 11

2~48 m

Median survival time 23 m

  

OG

41/98

0/0/139

27 ± 10

Median survival time 22.5 m

Hu

China

LG

24/85

0/0/109

31.4 ± 14.2

2~56 m

1-year OS rate 91.0 %, 3-year OS rate 73.7 %, 5-year OS rate 54.5 %

  

OG

25/99

0/0/124

32.6 ± 11.7

1-year OS rate 92.9 %, 3-year OS rate 77 %, 5-year OS rate 59.2 %

Li

China

LG

3/51

0/0/54

27.8 ± 3.9

36 m

1-year OS rate 85.2 %, 3-year OS rate 55.6 %

  

OG

5/49

0/0/54

26.7 ± 4.6

1-year OS rate 81.5 %, 3-year OS rate 57.4 %

Qiu

China

LG

0/30

0/0/30

30.2 ± 12.0

NR

NR

  

OG

0/34

0/0/34

28.1 ± 11.8

NR

NR

Suzuki

Japan

LG

37/1

6/30/2

NR

Median 42 m

Three died from pneumonia, one was lung cancer-related,and one was while bathing

  

OG

26/2

12/12/4

NR

One patient died from gastric cancer and three died from cerebrovascular disease

  1. EGC early gastric cancer, AGC advanced gastric cancer, LND lymph node dissection, LG laparoscopic gastrectomy, OG open gastrectomy, NR not reported, OS overall survival, DFS disease-free survival