Skip to main content

Table 3 Pathological characteristics after curative resection

From: Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with open resection for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched study with long-term follow-up

 

Open

HALS

P value

(n = 116)

(n = 116)

 

Pathological TNM stage

  

0.711b

  CR

1 (0.9)

1 (0.9)

 

  0

2 (1.7)

1 (0.9)

 

  I

30 (25.9)

27 (23.3)

 

  II

46 (39.6)

52 (44.8)

 

  III

37 (31.9)

35 (30.2)

 

T stage

  

0.641c

  T0

1 (0.9)

1 (0.9)

 

  Tis

2 (1.7)

1 (0.9)

 

  T1

11 (9.5)

17 (14.6)

 

  T2

31 (26.7)

29 (25)

 

  T3

71 (61.2)

68 (58.6)

 

N stage

  

0.578

  N0

79 (68.1)

81 (69.8)

 

  N1

17 (14.7)

12 (10.4)

 

  N2

20 (13.8)

23 (12.9)

 

Grade of differentiation

  

0.687

  Well

12 (10.3)

18 (15.5)

 

  Moderate

80 (69.0)

75 (64.7)

 

  Poor

17 (1.7)

16 (13.8)

 

  Mucinous

5 (4.3)

6 (5.2)

 

  Unknown

2

1

 

Isolated lymph nodes

12.2 ± 3.5

13.5 ± 4.6

0.342

CRM

  

0.374a

  Involved (≤1 mm)

8 (5.4)

4 (3.4)

 

  Noninvolved (>1 mm)

99 (85.3)

101 (87.1)

 

  Missing

9

11

 

Distal margin involvedc

0 (0)

1 (1.0)

1.000a

  1. CR Complete response, CRM Circumferential resection margin
  2. aFisher exact test
  3. bCR, TNM stage 0, and stage I were combined for statistical analysis
  4. cT0, Tis, and T1 were combined for statistical analysis