Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Minimal access versus open spinal surgery in treating painful spine metastasis: a systematic review

Study

Year

Type of study

Quality

Number of Patients

Mean age

Procedure

Primary

Outcome

Follow-up

Minimal

         

Pizzoli et al. [20]

2009

Retrospective

Very low

39

NA

PVP with PMMA

Mixed

VAS, mobility, analgesic use

NA

Chen et al. [21]

2009

Retrospective

Very low

31

67

PVP with PMMA

Mixed

VAS, Karnofsky scale

12 months

Qian et al. [22]

2011

Retrospective

Very low

48

68.5

Kyphoplasty

Mixed

VAS, ODI, SF-36, vertebral body height variation

24 months

Farrokhi et al. [15]

2012

Prospective

Very low

25

53.5

PVP with PMMA

Mixed

VAS

NA

Tseng et al. [23]

2008

Retrospective

Very low

57

65.18

PVP with PMMA

Mixed

VAS, amounts of nonnarcotic and narcotic analgesic

6 months

Yang et al. [16]

2009

Prospective

Very low

40

57.63

PVP with PMMA

Mixed

VAS, KPS

1 year

Pflugmacher et al. [17]

2008

Prospective

Very low

65

66

Balloon kyphoplasty

Mixed

VAS, ODI

24 months

Anselmetti et al. [18]

2013

Prospective

Very low

40

66.8

PVP with PEEK

Mixed

VAS, ODI

10 months

Open

Holman et al. [24]

2005

Retrospective

Very low

139

55

Posterior/anterior/combined tumor resection, decompression, instrumentation, fusion

Mixed

VAS, Frankel grades

12 months

Chong et al. [25]

2012

Retrospective

Very low

105

58.3

Single-stage posterior decompression and stabilization

Mixed

VAS, Frankel grade, KPS

48 months

Eid et al. [26]

2011

Retrospective

Very low

45

53

Circumferential decompression and fusion by means of PTA

Mixed

VAS, ASIA grades

13 months

Liang et al. [27]

2013

Retrospective

Very low

92

NA

Posterior/anterior/combined tumor resection, decompression, instrumentation, fusion

Mixed

VAS, Frankel grades, Karnofsky score, Tokuhashi scores

22 months

Wonik Cho et al. [28]

2012

Retrospective

Very low

46

56.4

ACF, ACF and PF, DLF, DL

Mixed

VAS, JOAS, Tomita score

39 months

Walter et al. [29]

2012

Retrospective

Very low

57

58.6

Posterolateral approach for decompression combined with posterior instrumentation

Mixed

VAS, Frankel grades, ECOG grades, TPS

46 months

Dae-Chul Cho et al. [30]

2009

Retrospective

Very low

21

56.6

Posterolateral transpedicular approach with posterior instrumentation

Mixed

VAS, Frankel grades, and ECOG grades

13 months

Shehadi et al. [31]

2007

Retrospective

Very low

87

53

Posterior/anterior/combined tumor resection, decompression, instrumentation, fusion

Breast cancer

VAS, Frankel grades

13 months

Street et al. [19]

2007

Prospective

Very low

42

56.04

Single-stage posterolateral vertebrectomy

Mixed

VAS, ECOG grading

NA

  1. PVP percutaneous vertebroplasty, PMMA polymethyl methacrylate, PEEK polyetheretherketone, VAS visual analog scale, ODI Oswestry Disability Index, JOAS Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score, KPS Karnofsky performance scores, ASIA American Spinal Injury Association, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, PTA posterolateral transpedicular approach, TPS Tomita’s prognostic score, ACF anterior corpectomy and fusion, ACF and PF ACF and posterior fixation, DLF decompressive laminectomy posterior fixation, DL decompressive laminectomy, NA not available, SF-36 Short Form 36 Physical Function.