Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics for 10 patients who received EPVS

From: Feasibility of externalized peritoneovenous shunt (EPVS) for malignant ascites

No.

age

sex

primary disease

nature of ascites

PS

indication for EPVS

EPVS duration, days

survival duration, days

outcome

AEs

1

22

F

synovial sarcoma

serous

3

poor PS

6

6

not effective

renal failure**

2

64

M

mesothelioma

serous

1

potential PVS dysfunction

3

133

effective*

none

3

46

M

lymphoma

serous

4

anasarca, poor PS

14

23

effective*

pulmonary edema**, diarrhea

4

62

F

ovary cancer

bloody

1

history of PVS occlusion

4

200

effective*

none

5

49

F

colon cancer

bloody

1

anasarca, potential PVS dysfunction

4

77

effective*

none

6

57

F

mesothelioma

serous

1

potential PVS dysfunction

16

133

effective*

none

7

56

F

breast cancer

chylous

1

potential PVS dysfunction

3

114

effective*

none

8

48

F

lung cancer

chylous

1

anasarca, history of PVS occlusion

28

28

effective

diarrhea, anemia

9

50

F

cholangiocarcinoma

chylous

4

anasarca, poor PS

24

24

effective

diarrhea

10

69

M

chondrosarcoma

serous

4

poor PS

2

2

not effective

renal failure**

median

52.3

     

10.4

74.0

  
  1. The EPVS system was removed and exchanged to conventional PVS on the same day.
  2. PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status
  3. EPVS: externalized peritoneovenous shunt
  4. PVS: peritoneovenous shunt, AEs: adverse events
  5. *: EPVS was exchanged to conventional PVS
  6. **: major adverse event