Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of publication year, study type, cases in each group and GTR, length of operation and hospital stay for included studies

From: Endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery: a meta-analysis

Study

Publication year

Study type

Cases in each group

Cases of GTR

Length of operation (mean, min)

Length of hospital stay (day)

E

M

E

M

E

M

E

M

Chen et al. [7]

2011

RC

68

59

48

29

128

170

4.3(3 to 12)

7.3(5 to 22)

D'Haens et al. [8]

2009

RC

60

60

38

30

NA

NA

NA

NA

Higgins et al. [9]

2008

RC

16

25

14

20

117

152

3

5.3

O'Maley et al. [10]

2008

RC

25

25

14(21)a

17(22)a

176.4

264.6

3.92 (3 to 9)

4.84 (3 to 9)

Choe et al. [11]

2008

RC

12

11

10

8

NA

NA

NA

NA

Casler et al. [12]

2005

RC

15

15

10

12

255.33

245.73

4.4(2 to 7)

5.73(3 to 8)

Atkinson et al. [13]

2008

RC

21

21

21

21

NA

NA

3.0(1 to 10)

4.5(2 to 9)

Sheehan et al. [14]

1999

RC

26

44

7(16)a

15(36)a

162

204

NA

NA

White et al.[15]

2004

RC

50

50

NA

NA

NA

NA

3.7

5.4

Razak et al. [16]

2013

RC

40

40

15(16)a

8(14)a

202

169

6 ± 7.5

8 ± 6.7

Messerer et al. [17]

2011

RC

82

82

61

41

NA

NA

NA

NA

Cappabianca et al. [18]

1999

RC

10

20

9

14

NA

NA

3.1 ± 0.4

6.2 ± 0.3

Koren et al. [19]

1999

RC

20

20

NA

NA

NA

NA

3.7(3 to 4)

7(6 to 10)

Duz et al. [20]

2008

RC

28

40

15

20

NA

NA

NA

NA

Neal et al. [21]

2007

RC

14

15

NA

NA

NA

NA

3.4

8.3

  1. aOnly the cases in brackets were followed to evaluate resection rate. E, endoscopic group; GTR, gross tumor removal; M, microscopic group; NA, not available; RC, retrospective cohort study.