Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic data from identified studies in the literature and our cases a

From: Breast cancer arising within fibroadenoma: collective analysis of case reports in the literature and hints on treatment policy

Patient

Study

Age (yr)

Tumor size (cm)

Noted tumor duration (months)

Histology

TNM stage

Surgery

LN dissection

LN metastasis

Receptor status

C/T

H/T

R/T

Outcome

1

Kurosumi et al., 1994[14]

42

2 × 3

21

IDC

 

Ex

A

      

2

Sarela et al., 1995[15]

56

2 × 3

2

LCIS + IDC

 

MT

A

P

     

3

Shah et al., 1999[16]

45

2.5 × 2

3

LCIS

TisN0M0

Ex

 

N

     

4

Yano et al., 2001[17]

54

2

 

ILC

TisN0M0

Ex

A

N

     

5

Kuijper et al., 2002[18]

46

Multiple

 

DCIS + LCIS

TisN0M0

MT

       

6

Abe et al., 2004[19]

42

5.1 × 4.4

60

IDC

 

MT

A

P

ER-PR+

Yes

Yes

No

 

7

Stafyla et al., 2004[20]

27

3.4

 

LCIS

TisN0M0

Ex

 

N

     

8

Shin et al., 2006[21]

51

1.5 × 1

12

IDC

 

MT

S

N

ER+PR+

    

9

Yuen et al., 2007[22]

39

1.1

 

ILC

 

BCS

       

10

Yuen et al., 2007[22]

45

0.8

 

ILC

 

BCS

       

11

Borecky and Rickard, 2008[23]

64

1.2

 

IDC

T1bN0M0

BCS

S

N

ER+PR+

    

12

Borecky and Rickard, 2008[23]

80

4.5

600

IDC

 

BCS

S

N

     

13

Borecky and Rickard, 2008[23]

53

1.7

12

DCIS

TisN0M0

Ex

S

N

     

14

Gashi-Luci et al., 2009[24]

39

2.6 × 1.6

 

IDC

 

MT

A

N

ER-PR-

   

R

          

HER2-

    

15

Khandelwal et al., 2009[25]

35

2 × 3

2

IDC

 

BCS

A

P

ER+PR+

Yes

Yes

Yes

 
          

HER2-

    

16

Iyengar et al., 2009[26]

43

1.8

24

IDC

 

MT

  

ER-PR-

    
          

HER2+

    

17

Rao et al., 2010[27]

30

4 × 2

1

IDC

 

MT

A

P

ER-PR-

Yes

No

Yes

 
          

HER2-

    

18

Petersson et al., 2010[28]

49

3

48

IDC

 

Ex

S

N

ER+PR+

    
          

HER2-

    

19

Kato et al., 2011[29]

42

1.5

 

DCIS

TisN0M0

BCS

S

N

     

20

Ooe et al., 2011[30]

46

2.4 × 1.7

60

DCIS

TisN0M0

BCS

S

N

ER+PR+

No

Yes

Yes

 

21

Tajima et al., 2011[31]

60

1.9 × 1.6

3

ILC

 

BCS

  

ER+PR+

    
          

HER2-

    

22

Abu-Rahmeh et al., 2012[32]

69

5

180

IDC

        

Lung metastasisb

23

Jahan et al., 2012[33]

55

5 × 4 × 3

240

IDC

 

MT

       

24

Butler et al., 2012[34]

46

0.8 × 0.8

 

ILC

T1bN0M0

Ex

       

25

Present study

39

2.7 × 2.7

24

IDC

T1aN0M0

BCS

S

N

ER+PR+

No

Nr

Nr

 
          

HER2-

    

26

Present study

31

3.5 × 3.4

84

IDC

T1aN1M0

MT

A

P

ER+PR+

Yes

Yes

No

 
          

HER2-

    

27

Present study

30

1.5 × 1.4

 

DCIS

TisN0M0

BCS

  

ER+PR+

No

Yes

No

 
          

HER2-

    

28

Present study

63

1.2

0.5

DCIS

TisN0M0

BCS

S

N

ER+PR+

No

Yes

Yes

 
          

HER2-

    

29

Present study

48

0.9

3

DCIS

TisN0M0

Ex

S

N

 

No

No

No

 

30

Present study

40

0.6

0

IDC

T1bN0M0

MT

S

N

ER +PR-

No

Yes

No

 
  1. aA, Axillary lymph node dissection level I/II/III; B, Benign; C/T, Chemotherapy; ER, Estrogen receptor; Ex, Excision; HER2, Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ; H/T, Hormone therapy; LN, Lymph node; M, Malignancy; MT, Mastectomy; N, Negative; Nr, Patient refuse; P, Positive; PR, Progesterone receptor; R, Recurrence; R/T, Radiotherapy; S, Sentinel lymph node dissection; TNM, Tumor, node, metastasis. bLung metastasis at diagnosis.