Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of studies included in the meta-analysis a

From: Percutaneous transhepatic and endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant biliary tract obstruction: a meta-analysis

First author

Year

Study type

Comparison

Number of cases

Malignancy causing biliary obstruction

Age, yr

Males,%

Type of stent placed

Prophylactic antibiotics

Follow-up period

Saluja

2008

RCT

PTBD vs. EBD

27 vs. 27

Carcinoma of the gallbladder

51 vs. 50

37% vs. 30%

Plastic stent

Cefoperazone + sulbactam

3 months

Piñol

2002

RCT

PTBD vs. EBD

28 vs. 26

Primary carcinoma of the pancreas, gallbladder, or bile ducts, or to regional lymph node metastases

75 vs. 70

43% vs. 42%

Metal stent

Ciprofloxacin

Median: 2.5 months

Speer

1987

RCT

PTBD vs. EBD

36 vs. 39

Primary carcinoma of the pancreas, gallbladder, or bile ducts

73 vs. 72.5

NA

Plastic stent

NA

NA

  1. aEBD, Endoscopic biliary drainage; NA, not available; PTBD, Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage; RCT, Randomized controlled trial.