Skip to main content

Table 3 Recurrence rates after different surgical treatment of giant cell tumors of bone

From: Pulmonary metastasis of giant cell tumor of bones

Study (Author/year)

Number of patients

Wide resection

Intralesional curettage

Intralesional curettage + regional burring

Intralesional curettage + PMMA

Klenke et al. 2011 [35]

118

5

N/A

32

+ phenol + burrin:15

Errani et al. 2010 [32]

349

12

N/A

18

 

Balke et al. 2008 [37]

214

0

140

47

+phenol: 38

Kivioja et al. 2008 [11]

294

12

51

N/A

22

Knochentumoren 2008 [52]

256

2

49

N/A

+phenol:69

Malek et al. 2006 [56]

40

N/A

N/A

33

N/A

McGough et al. 2005 [57]

183

N/A

46

N/A

N/A

Prosser et al. 2005 [40]

137

0

N/A

N/A

+burring: 21

Su et al. 2004 [41]

87

3

N/A

N/A

+phenol: 18

Turcotte et al. 2002 [55]

186

34

N/A

N/A

+phenol + burring:55

Blackley et al. 1999 [43]

59

N/A

N/A

12

N/A

Campanacci et al. 1987 [1]

280

0

27

N/A

8

McDonald 1986 [45]

146

7

N/A

34

N/A

  1. Results from the current literature implies that the recurrence ratio of GCT is: Intralesional curettage > Intralesional curettage + regional burring > Intralesional curettage + local adjuvants + PMMA > Wide resection.