First author and publishing year | Case nationality | Dominant ethnicity | Study design | Case number | Follow-up median (m) | RT (%) | AST (%) | Types of recurrence | Source of HR | Characteristics of enrolled cases | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | HT | CT |  |  |  |
Hattangadi[30] | USA | Caucasian | R | 1,223 | 70 | 100 | 77.0 | 46.0 | TR | Reported | IBC, pT1-2 N0-3 |
Zauls[31] | USA | Caucasian | P | 459 | 45 | 100 | Total 62.1 | LF | DE | DCIS or IBC, tumor size ≤3 cm, positive LNs ≤3 | |
Han[32] | Canada | Caucasian | R | 180 | 104.4 | 30.6 | NM | NM | LR | Reported | DCIS with or without microinvasion |
Millar[33] | Australia | Caucasian | P | 498 | 64 | 100 | 49.0 | 38.0 | LRR/IBTR/DM | DE | IBC |
Moran[34] | USA | Caucasian | R | 368 | 78 | 100 | 49.0 | 36.0 | LR | DE | IBC, stage I-II, LN (+), margin (-) |
Wong[35] | Singapore | Asian | R | 541 | 72 | 100 | 68.0 | 36.0 | LR/DM | Reported | IBC, LN (-) |
Kim[36] | Korea | Asian | P | 1,589 | 61 | 100 | 71.8 | 66.4 | IBTR | Reported | IBC, tumor size ≤5 cm, age >40 years |
Bantema[37] | Netherlands | Caucasian | R | 752 | 41 | 100 | 38.7 | 35.4 | LR/DM | Reported | IBC, stages I-III |
Arvold[38] | USA | Caucasian | R | 1,434 | 85 | 100 | Total 91.0 | LR | Reported | IBC, stage I-II | |
Truong[39] | Canada | Caucasian | R | 5,688 | 71.7 | 100 | 36.6 | 26.7 | LR/RR/LRR | Reported | IBC, pT1-2, positive LNs ≤3, M0 |
Sharon[40] | Canada | Caucasian | R | 133 | 107 | 0.0 | NM | NM | LR | Reported | DCIS, margin (-) |
Roos[41] | Netherlands | Caucasian | R | 39 | 39 | 51.3 | 0.0 | NM | LR | DE | DCIS |
Yau[42] | China | Asian | R | 605 | 64.8 | 100 | 74.0 | 45.0 | IBTR/DF | Reported | IBC, T1-2 |
Smith[43] | USA | Caucasian | R | 8,724 | 60 | 73.0 | NM | 3.0 | SIBC | Reported | IBC, age ≥70 years, tumor size ≤2 cm, LN (-) |
Silvestrini[44] | Spain | Caucasian | R | 635 | 72 | 78.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | LR | Reported | Resectable breast cancer, N0, M0 |