Skip to main content

Table 4 Evolution of quality indicators as formulated by EUSOMA prospectively evaluated between 2003 and 2010 (data for first semester)

From: A dynamic clinical pathway for the treatment of patients with early breast cancer is a tool for better cancer care: implementation and prospective analysis between 2002–2010

Outcome measure

  

2003

 

2010

 

P value

 

EUSOMA

      
 

Minimum standard

Target

N

%

N

%

 

Positive preoperative cyto/histological diagnosis

  

77/130

59.7%

161/183

88.4%

0.0001

 

80%

90%

     

Operated invasive carcinoma for which hist. type, grading ER/PR, stage and size were recorded

  

106/112

94.6%

178/181

98.3%

0.1467

 

90%

95%

     

Operated non invasive carcinoma for which size, histological type and grading are recorded

  

5/7

71%

28/29

96.5%

0.4966

 

95%

98%

     

More than 9 lymph nodes removed when ALD performed (excluding sampling)

  

97/112

85.6%

67/70

95.7%

0.0434

 

95%

98%

     

Postoperative radiotherapy in M0 invasive CA with BCT

  

50/51

98%

105/108

97.2%

0.7588

 

90%

95%

     

BCT in invasive carcinoma with total size up to 30 mm (including DCIS component)

  

49/79

62%

86/104

82.6%

0.0016

 

70%

80%

     

BCT in carcinoma in situ up to 20 mm

  

3/7

43.8%

11/14

78.6

0.0016

 

70%

80%

     

Ductal carcinoma in situ without axillary dissection

  

6/7

85.7%

22/23

95.6%

0.3560

 

80%

90%

     

Hormonotherapy in endocrine sensitive invasive carcinoma

  

89/105

84.8%

151/155

97.4%

0.0002

 

80%

90%

     

Adjuvant chemotherapy in ER- (PT1c+ or N+) invasive Carcinoma

  

18/25

72%

22/23

95.6%

0.0280

 

80%

90%

     
  1. N: number of patients; %: percentage of successful outcome measure/total number of cases; ER: estrogen receptor; PR: progesterone receptor; ALD: axillary lymph node dissection; BCT: breast conserving therapy; DCIS: ductal carcinoma in situ; significance level calculated with two-tailed χ2 test without Yates correction.