Skip to main content

Table 3 Frequency of curve types

From: Evaluation of chemosensitivity prediction using quantitative dose–response curve classification for highly advanced/relapsed gastric cancer

Curve Typesa
Drug Logistic (%) Hyperbolic (%) Straight (%) Exponential (%) Linear (%) Noise-dominant (%)
CIS 9(9.7) 11(33.3) 0 1(50.0) 3(23.1) 5(11.6)
5FU 5(5.4) 7(21.2) 3(33.3) 0 3(23.1) 11(25.6)
CPT 10(10.8) 3(9.1) 1(11.1) 0 1(7.7) 5(11.6)
SN38 11(11.8) 0(0.0) 0 0 2(15.4) 8(18.6)
DTX 18(19.4) 3(9.1) 1(11.1) 1(50.0) 0 5(11.6)
PXL 22(23.7) 1(3.0) 1(11.1) 0 1(7.7) 4(9.3)
OXP 3(3.2) 0(0.0) 0 0 0 0
EPS 3(3.2) 1(3.0) 0 0 0 0
GEM 1(1.1) 1(3.0) 0 0 1(7.7) 0
5FU + LEU 0(0) 2(6.1) 0 0 1(7.7) 0
CIS + 5FU 4(4.3) 3(9.1) 1(11.1) 0 0 1(2.3)
MTX 3(3.2) 0 0 0 1(7.7) 3(7.0)
5FU + MTX 1(1.1) 0 1(11.1) 0 0 0
EPI 0 0 1(11.1) 0 0 0
CBP 0 1(3.0) 0 0 0 0
5FU + DTX 1(1.1) 0 0 0 0 0
5FU + SN38 1(1.1) 0 0 0 0 0
DXR 1(1.1) 0 0 0 0 0
VIN 0 0 0 0 0 1(2.3)
Curve Fractionb 93(48.2) 33(17.1) 9(4.7) 2(1.0) 13(6.7) 43(22.2)
  1. a% indicates fraction per curve type; b% indicates fraction of all 193 curve types.
Back to article page

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

ISSN: 1477-7819

Contact us