Table 2 Clinical and histopathological criteria stratified by sialyl Le X expression
From: A novel sialyl LeX expression score as a potential prognostic tool in colorectal cancer
| Â | Weak sialyl LeX expression n (%) | Strong sialyl LeX expression n (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Patients | 113 | (52.6) | 102 | (47.4) |
Mean age (years) | 67.2 | 67.6 | ||
Gender ratio (f/m) | 1:1.57 | (44:69) | 1:1 | (51:51) |
Infiltration (pT) | Â | Â | Â | Â |
T1 | 2 | (1.8) | 0 | (0.0) |
T2 | 13 | (11.5) | 6 | (5.9) |
T3 | 54 | (47.8) | 42 | (41.2) |
T4 | 44 | (38.9) | 54 | (52.9) |
Lymph node metastasis (pN) | Â | Â | Â | Â |
N0 | 10 | (8.8) | 9 | (8.8) |
N1 | 61 | (54.0) | 39 | (38.2) |
N2 | 42 | (37.2) | 54 | (52.9) |
Metastasis | Â | Â | Â | Â |
M0 | 64 | (56.6) | 49 | (48.0) |
M1 | 49 | (43.4) | 53 | (52.0) |
Grading | Â | Â | Â | Â |
G1 | 18 | (15.9) | 26 | (25.5) |
G2 | 79 | (69.9) | 70 | (68.6) |
G3 | 16 | (14.2) | 6 | (5.9) |
Localization | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Colon | 70 | (61.9) | 72 | (70.6) |
Rectum | 43 | (38.1) | 30 | (29.4) |