Skip to main content

Table 4 Risk factors for poor outcome by the breast surgeon’s JBCS Cosmetic Evaluation Scale

From: Outcomes of reconstructive techniques in breast cancer using BCCT. core software

 

Univariate analyses

Multivariate analyses

 

HR

95% CI

p-value

HR

95% CI

p-value

Age

1.01

0.97–1.05

0.62

   

Follow-up time

1.012

1.004–1.021

0.003

1.02

1.01–1.03

< 0.001

Tumor size

1.036

1.004–1.068

0.027

1.02

0.98–1.06

0.24

Retrieved lymph node number

1.044

1.002–1.087

0.041

1.04

0.99–1.08

0.94

Tumor localization

(UOQ vs others)

2.88

1.0–8.3

0.05

4.2

1.3–13.5

0.016

Radiation therapy

0.57

0.18–1.81

0.34

   

Surgical Procedure

 BCS. vs mini LDF

 BCS vs M + I

2.01

2.61

0.52–7.68

0.91–7.49

0.30

0.074

   
  1. BCS Breast Conserving Surgery, M + I Mastectomy and Implant, UOQ Upper outer quadrant, JBSC Japanese Breast Conserving Surgery Cosmetic Evaluation Scale