Outcomes of reconstructive techniques in breast cancer using BCCT. core software

Table 3 Risk factors for poor outcome by plastic surgeon’s JBCS Cosmetic Evaluation Scale

	Univariate analyses			Multivariate analyses
	HR	95% CI	p-value	HR	95% CI	p-value
Age	1.001	0.96–1.04	0.96
Follow-up time	1.01	1.003–1.02	0.006	1.013	1.005–1.022	0.002
Tumor size	1.03	1.005–1.067	0.021	1.04	1.009–1.073	0.011
Retrieved lymph Node number	1.04	0.99–1.08	0.061
Tumor localization (UOQ vs others)	2.56	0.96–6.88	0.061
Radiation therapy	0.97	0.27–3.41	0.95
Surgical Procedure
BCS. vs mini LDF BCS vs M + I	1.53 1.6	0.41–5.66 0.54–4.67	0.52 0.39

BCS Breast Conserving Surgery, M + I Mastectomy and Implant, UOQ Upper outer quadrant, JBSC Japanese Breast Conserving Surgery Cosmetic Evaluation Scale

ISSN: 1477-7819