Skip to main content

Table 3 The pooled results of the multivariate analysis of OS and DFS

From: Prognostic factors for invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung: systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical endpoints

Prognostic factors

No. of study

Sample

HR (95% CI)

p-value

I2 (%)

OS

Gender (female vs. male)

3

176

0.80 (0.32, 1.96)

0.618

0.0

Age (older vs. younger)

6

497

1.06 (0.99, 1.14)

0.090

66.6

TNM stage (III-IV vs. I-II)

/

/

/

/

/

Smoking status (yes vs. no)

4

385

4.71 (1.52, 14.58)

0.007

56.8

Tumor size (bigger vs. smaller)

5

667

1.27 (1.07, 1.50)

0.006

67.9

Metastasis (no vs. yes)

     

Lymph node metastasis

3

338

0.14 (0.07, 0.28)

 < 0.001

0.0

Pleural invasion

/

/

/

/

/

Pathological features

     

STAS (+ vs. −)

2

240

6.10 (2.17, 17.12)

0.001

0.0

Pathological grade (higher vs. lower)

2

191

3.44 (0.80, 14.75)

0.096

62.1

Gene mutation (positive vs. negative)

     

EGFR mutation

/

/

/

/

/

ALK mutation

2

129

0.44 (0.04, 4.49)

0.492

76.4

CT manifestations

     

CT morphology (consolidative vs. nodular type)

3

321

3.44 (0.78, 15.17)

0.102

62.9

Pneumonia type (pneumonia vs. solitary)

2

119

3.39 (1.19, 9.62)

0.022

3.4

Well defined heterogeneous GGO (+ vs. −)

2

240

1.20 (0.44, 3.25)

0.722

0.0

Spiculated margin (+ vs. −)

/

/

/

/

/

Lobulated margin (+ vs. −)

/

/

/

/

/

Air bronchogram (+ vs. −)

/

/

/

/

/

DFS

Gender (female vs. male)

/

/

/

/

/

Age (older vs. younger)

3

300

1.02 (0.99, 1.06)

0.232

37.3

TNM stage (III-IV vs. I-II)

/

/

/

/

/

Smoking status (yes vs. no)

2

179

1.83 (0.84, 4.01)

0.130

0.0

Tumor size (bigger vs. smaller)

3

251

2.22 (1.01, 4.90)

0.047

72.1

Metastasis (no vs. yes)

     

Lymph node metastasis

2

219

0.18 (0.09, 0.35)

 < 0.001

0.0

Pleural invasion

/

/

/

/

/

Pathological features

     

STAS (+ vs. −)

/

/

/

/

/

Pathological grade (higher vs. lower)

2

123

8.94 (3.10, 25.80)

 < 0.001

0.0

Gene mutation (positive vs. negative)

     

EGFR mutation

/

/

/

/

/

ALK mutation

/

/

/

/

/

CT manifestations

     

CT morphology (consolidative vs. nodular type)

2

202

1.32 (0.15, 11.74)

0.804

79.3

Pneumonia type (pneumonia vs. solitary)

2

389

2.90 (1.55, 5.42)

0.001

19.3

Well defined heterogeneous GGO (+ vs. −)

/

/

/

/

/

Spiculated margin (+ vs. −)

/

/

/

/

/

Lobulated margin (+ vs. −)

/

/

/

/

/

Air bronchogram (+ vs. −)

/

/

/

/

/