Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of our meta-analysis with another published meta-analysis

From: Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation in patients with early and small hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis and meta-regression of observational studies

 

Mou‐Bo Si 2019 [16]

Xiaocheng Li 2019 [20]

Shan Jin 2020 [17]

Zhijun Li 2021 [19]

Our study

Total studies included in MA

6

10

7

19

19

Total sample size

597

1570

615

2038

3756

Language of included studies

English

English

English

3 in English,16 in Chinese

English

Number of outcomes analyzed

6

4

5

9

16

Subgroup analysis based on

Tumor size and RFA approaches

Tumor sizes

NR

Tumor sizes, RFA approaches and study areas in China

RFA

approaches

Meta regression covariates

NR

NR

NR

NR

age, tumor size, total bilirubin, and alpha-fetoprotein

OS, DFS, RFS measured at

At 1 year, and 3 years

At 1year,3 years, and 5 years

NR

At 1 year, and 3 years

At 1year,3 years, and 5 years

Overall survival

At 1year no statistical differences

At 3 years favors MIS group

Favors LH at 1year,3 years, and 5 years

NR

At 1year no statistical differences

At 3 years favors LLR group

Favors LLR group at 1year,3 years, and 5 years

Overall survival PSM

NR

NR

NR

NR

At 3 years Favors LLR group, At 1and 5 years no statistical differences

Disease‐free survival

At 1 year and 3 years favors MIS group

At 1 year and 3 years favors LH

At 5 years

no statistical differences

NR

At 1 year and 3 years favors LLR group

At 1 year and 3 years favors LLR group, at 5 years no statistical differences

Disease‐free survival PSM

NR

NR

NR

NR

At 1 year and 3 years favors LLR group, at 5 years no statistical differences

Recurrence-free survival

NR

NR

NR

NR

Favors LLR group

Recurrence-free survival PSM

NR

NR

NR

NR

Favors LLR group

Overall response rate

NR

NR

NR

Favors RFA group

NR

Local recurrence

Higher with RFA group

Higher with RFA group

Higher with RFA group

Higher with RFA group

Higher with RFA group

Intrahepatic recurrence

NR

NR

NR

NR

Higher with RFA group

Extrahepatic recurrence

NR

NR

NR

NR

no statistical differences

Postoperative liver function index

NR

NR

NR

RFA group had lower AST and higher ALB levels, with no significant differences in ALT, TBIL, and AFP levels

NR

Duration of surgery

Lower with RFA group

NR

Lower with RFA group

Lower with RFA group

Lower with RFA group

Duration of hospital stay

Lower with RFA group

NR

Lower with RFA group

NR

Lower with RFA group

Incidence of blood transfusion during surgery

NR

NR

Lower with RFA group

Lower with RFA group

Lower with RFA group

Estimated bleeding volume during surgery

NR

NR

Lower with RFA group

Lower with RFA group

NR

All complications

Higher with MIS

Higher with LH group

NR

Higher with LLR group

Higher with LLR group

30-days mortality

NR

NR

NR

NR

lower with LLR group

90-days mortality

NR

NR

NR

NR

Higher with LLR group

Major complications

NR

NR

NR

NR

Higher with LLR group

  1. Abbreviations: MA Meta-analysis, RFA Radiofrequency ablation, OS Overall survival, DFS Disease free survival, RFS Recurrence free survival, MIS Minimally invasive liver surgery, LH Laparoscopic hepatectomy, LLR Laparoscopic liver resection, PSM Propensity-score matching, AST Aspartate Aminotransferase, ALB Albumin, ALT Alanine Aminotransferase, TBIL Total Bilirubin, AFP Alpha-Fetoprotein, NR Not reported