Skip to main content

TableĀ 1 Clinical and pathological data for patients associated with ypN status

From: Development and evaluation of the Newstage system: integrating tumor regression grade and lymph node status for improved prognostication in neoadjuvant treatment of gastric cancer

Ā 

ypN0 Nā€‰=ā€‰139

ypN1 Nā€‰=ā€‰50

ypN2 Nā€‰=ā€‰32

ypN3a Nā€‰=ā€‰25

ypN3b Nā€‰=ā€‰12

p.overall

Gender

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

0.886

ā€ƒF

40 (28.8%)

16 (32.0%)

9 (28.1%)

8 (32.0%)

5 (41.7%)

Ā 

ā€ƒM

99 (71.2%)

34 (68.0%)

23 (71.9%)

17 (68.0%)

7 (58.3%)

Ā 

Age

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

0.778

ā€ƒā‰¤ā€‰60

44 (31.7%)

17 (34.0%)

10 (31.2%)

8 (32.0%)

6 (50.0%)

Ā 

ā€ƒ>ā€‰60

95 (68.3%)

33 (66.0%)

22 (68.8%)

17 (68.0%)

6 (50.0%)

Ā 

TRG

ā€ƒ0

32 (23.0%)

4 (8.00%)

1 (3.12%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

Ā 

ā€ƒ1

39 (28.1%)

4 (8.00%)

3 (9.38%)

0 (0.00%)

2 (16.7%)

Ā 

ā€ƒ2

38 (27.3%)

24 (48.0%)

10 (31.2%)

11 (44.0%)

5 (41.7%)

Ā 

ā€ƒ3

30 (21.6%)

18 (36.0%)

18 (56.2%)

14 (56.0%)

5 (41.7%)

Ā 

ypT

ā€ƒT0

32 (23.0%)

4 (8.00%)

1 (3.12%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

Ā 

ā€ƒT1

28 (20.1%)

9 (18.0%)

1 (3.12%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

Ā 

ā€ƒT2

31 (22.3%)

6 (12.0%)

4 (12.5%)

1 (4.00%)

0 (0.00%)

Ā 

ā€ƒT3

32 (23.0%)

20 (40.0%)

19 (59.4%)

13 (52.0%)

2 (16.7%)

Ā 

ā€ƒT4a

15 (10.8%)

11 (22.0%)

6 (18.8%)

11 (44.0%)

9 (75.0%)

Ā 

ā€ƒT4b

1 (0.72%)

0 (0.00%)

1 (3.12%)

0 (0.00%)

1 (8.33%)

Ā 

ypStage

ā€ƒpCR

28 (20.1%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

Ā 

ā€ƒypT0Nā€‰+ā€‰

0 (0.00%)

4 (8.00%)

1 (3.12%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

Ā 

ā€ƒypStage I

62 (44.6%)

9 (18.0%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

Ā 

ā€ƒypStage II

47 (33.8%)

24 (48.0%)

5 (15.6%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

Ā 

ā€ƒypStage III

2 (1.44%)

13 (26.0%)

26 (81.2%)

25 (100%)

12 (100%)

Ā 

Size(cm)

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€‰<ā€‰0.001

ā€ƒā‰¤ā€‰5

128 (92.1%)

43 (86.0%)

23 (71.9%)

14 (56.0%)

3 (25.0%)

Ā 

ā€ƒ>ā€‰5

11 (7.91%)

7 (14.0%)

9 (28.1%)

11 (44.0%)

9 (75.0%)

Ā 

Location

ā€ƒDiffuse

3 (2.16%)

1 (2.00%)

1 (3.12%)

0 (0.00%)

1 (8.33%)

Ā 

ā€ƒLower

71 (51.1%)

26 (52.0%)

16 (50.0%)

11 (44.0%)

6 (50.0%)

Ā 

ā€ƒMiddle

35 (25.2%)

11 (22.0%)

11 (34.4%)

12 (48.0%)

5 (41.7%)

Ā 

ā€ƒUpper

30 (21.6%)

12 (24.0%)

4 (12.5%)

2 (8.00%)

0 (0.00%)

Ā 

Differentiation

ā€ƒHigh

5 (3.60%)

2 (4.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

Ā 

ā€ƒMiddle

49 (35.3%)

21 (42.0%)

16 (50.0%)

8 (32.0%)

1 (8.33%)

Ā 

ā€ƒPoor

61 (43.9%)

24 (48.0%)

15 (46.9%)

15 (60.0%)

11 (91.7%)

Ā 

ā€ƒUnknown

24 (17.3%)

3 (6.00%)

1 (3.12%)

2 (8.00%)

0 (0.00%)

Ā 

Neoadjuvant

ā€ƒSOX

99 (71.2%)

34 (68.0%)

25 (78.1%)

13 (52.0%)

5 (41.7%)

Ā 

ā€ƒXELOX

25 (18.0%)

8 (16.0%)

3 (9.38%)

5 (20.0%)

5 (41.7%)

Ā 

ā€ƒFOLFOX

7 (5.04%)

6 (12.0%)

3 (9.38%)

3 (12.0%)

2 (16.7%)

Ā 

ā€ƒELSE

8 (5.76%)

2 (4.00%)

1 (3.12%)

4 (16.0%)

0 (0.00%)

Ā 

Post-operative adjuvant therapy

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

0.740

ā€ƒYes

118 (84.9%)

43 (86.0%)

30 (93.8%)

21 (84.0%)

10 (83.3%)

Ā 

ā€ƒNo

21 (15.1%)

7 (14.0%)

2 (6.25%)

4 (16.0%)

2 (16.7%)

Ā 

Combined immunotherapy

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

0.175

ā€ƒYes

24 (17.3%)

6 (12.0%)

5 (15.6%)

6 (24.0%)

5 (41.7%)

Ā 

ā€ƒNo

115 (82.7%)

44 (88.0%)

27 (84.4%)

19 (76.0%)

7 (58.3%)

Ā 
  1. Data are median (IQR) or n (%), SOX S-1 and oxaliplation; XELOX capecitabine and oxaliplatin; FOLFOX fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin; ELSE including infrequent chemotherapy regimens such as SPA, DCF, and FOLT