Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison between the studied groups (IDC and control normal breast tissue groups) regarding KIF18A immunostaining

From: Impact of immunohistochemical expression of kinesin family member 18A (Kif18A) and β-catenin in infiltrating breast carcinoma of no special type

KIF18A

 

Cases (n = 135)

Control normal breast (n = 40)

Test of sig.

P

No.

%

No.

%

Positivity

Negative

1

0.7

0

0.0

χ2=0.298

MCp=1.000

Positive

134

99.3

40

100.0

Localization

Cytoplasmic

59

44.0

0

0.0

χ2=119.814*

<0.001*

Nucleocytoplasmic

75

56.0

39

100

Percent

Min.–Max.

0.0–95.0

40.0–80.0

U=1260.50*

<0.001*

Mean ± SD.

74.78 ± 14.99

63.0 ± 11.70

Median (IQR)

80.0 (70.0–85.0)

62.50(52.50–75.0)

Intensity

Mild

9

6.7

9

22.5

χ2=17.851*

<0.001*

Moderate

34

25.4

18

45.0

Strong

91

67.9

13

32.5

Mild + moderate

43

32.1

27

67.5

χ2=16.064*

<0.001*

Strong

91

67.9

13

32.5

H score

Low (<210)

59

43.7

40

100.0

χ2=39.085*

<0.001*

High (>210)

76

56.3

0

0.0

Min.–Max.

0.0–285.0

65.0–180.0

U=953.50*

<0.001*

Mean ± SD.

197.93 ± 64.80

129.0 ± 35.41

Median (IQR)

210 (160.0–255.0)

140 (100.0–150.0)

  1. IQR interquartile range, SD standard deviation, U Mann-Whitney test, χ2 chi-square test, MC Monte Carlo, p p value for comparing between the studied groups
  2. *Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05