Table 5 Published reports of en bloc resection of the spine
Author/year | No. of patients/surgical type | Anterior reconstruction | Median F/ U (months) | Complication rate | Implant failure rate | LC rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Disch 2011 | 20/EBS | Carbon composite cage | 21.5 | - | 0% | 95.0% |
Matsumoto 2011 | 15/TES | TMC, ETC, cement | 41.5* | - | 40.0% | 86.7% |
Amendola 2014 | 103/EBR | Mesh, CF prosthetic system | - | 41.7% | 9.7% | 78.6% |
Boriani 2014 | 134/EBR | - | 47.0 | 35.1% | - | 84.3% |
Wang 2016 | 17/EBR | TMC | 24.0 | 70.6% | 0% | 70.6% |
Shah 2017 | 33/TES | - | 18.0 | 52.0% | 25.0% | 93.9% |
Li 2019 | 30/TES | TMC | 41.8* | - | 26.7% | 93.3% |
Zoccali 2019 | 37/EBS | Cage, allograft shaft | 42.2 | 64.9% | 8.1% | 82.4% |
Park 2019 | 32/TES | TMC, ETC, bone graft | 49.8* | - | 37.5% | 81.3% |
Demura 2021 | 307/TES | - | - | 67.1% | 26.7% | 89.6% |
Hu 2022 | 8/TES | 3D-printed AVB | 11.5 | 12.5% | 0% | 100% |
Present study 2023 | 51/EBR | 3D-printed AVB | 21.0 | 56.9% | 2.0% | 94.1% |