Skip to main content

Table 1 The median TOGS obtained in population studies

From: Textbook outcome in oncological gastric surgery: a systematic review and call for an international consensus

Author/year

Journal

Type of study/type of cancer

Number GC

Patients

Data:

- Treatment/gastrectomy

- Neoadjuvant

- Approach

- Other

TO

Factors associated with TO

Worst contributing factor TO

Variation between hospitals

Survival TO vs no TO/other

Busweiler

Br J Surg [1]

National Multicentre Database (Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit)

Esophageal and gastric cancer

1772

Type of treatment: total gastrectomy, partial gastrectomy, other gastrectomy, no resection, unknown

Neoadjuvant therapy: none, chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, unknown/other

Surgical approach: open, laparoscopy, unknown

Timing of surgery:: elective, emergency

Additional resection owing to tumor invasiveness: no, yes, unknown

32.1%

ASA grade < 3

Charlson < 2

Clinical tumor stage < 3

Tumor location: corpus, antrum/pylorus

Neoadjuvant therapy

No additional organ resection

 < 15 lymph nodes examined

11.4 to 52.4%

 

Priego

J Laparoend Adv Surg Tech [8]

Spanish Unicentric Database

Gastric cancer

96

Type of gastrectomy: total, distal

Neoadjuvant therapy: yes/no

Type of surgery: open, laparoscopy

51.04%

 

Severe complications (CD ≥ II)

ND

No statistical differences in TO between laparoscopy and open group

van der Kaaij

Br J Surg [4]

Unicentric Institutional Database

Esophageal and gastric cancer

105

Type of treatment: total gastrectomy, subtotal gastrectomy, no resection

Neoadjuvant therapy: none, chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy

45.7%

 

Severe complications (CD ≥ II)

ND

Better overall survival in TO group 54 months vs 33 p = 0.018 3 years

Van der Werf

Ann Surg [9]

Dutch Multicentric Database

Esophageal or gastric cancer

2943

 

35%

Relationship between number of gastrectomies per year

 

More TO in high volume

TO is associated with survival 64% vs 45% (p < 0.002) 3 years

Carbonell-Morote

Cir Esp [3]

Spanish unicentric database

Gastric cancer

91

Type of gastrectomy: subtotal, total

Neoadjuvant treatment: yes/no

34.1%

Relationship between TO and survival

 ≤ 15 lymph nodes examined

ND

Achievement of TO related to greater survival (TO/noTO) 50.5 months vs. 31.5 (p < 0.008) 5 years

Dal Cero

Eur J Surg Oncol [10]

Spanish Multi-institutional Database

(EURECCA)

Gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer

1293

Type of gastrectomy: subtotal, total

Neoadjuvant therapy: chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy

Surgical approach: open, laparoscopy

Timing of surgery: elective, emergency

Multivisceral resection: no, yes

41.1%

 < 65 years

BMI 24–29.9

Weight loss < 5%

ASA score I–II

CCI = 0

Preoperative Hb ≥ 10 gr/dL

Antrum-pylorus location

Laurén´s mixed type

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Surgery performed in 2017

Laparoscopic surgery

Elective surgery

Surgery without multivisceral resection

Severe complications (CD ≥ II)

TO in community hospitals (19.9%) lower than in reference and high technology centers (44.0 and 36.1%) (p = 0.01)

Archievement of TO related to greater survival 72.79 (95%CI: 68.90–76.90) vs 53.48% (95%CI:49.93–57.28) 36 months p < 0.001

Sedłak

Eur J Surg Oncol [11]

Polish Unicentric Database

Gastric cancer

194

Type of gastrectomy: total gastrectomy, proximal gastrectomy, subtotal gastrectomy, esophagectomy with proximal gastrectomy

Perioperative chemotherapy: yes, no

40.2%

  

ND

TO group 51% lower risk of death compared to patients without TO

Bolger

Eur J Surg Oncol [12]

Two center Ireland

Esophageal and gastric cancer

258

Type of gastrectomy: subtotal gastrectomy, total gastrectomy

37%

Age

Neoadjuvant therapy

Laparoscopy

 

ND

Minimally invasive surgery is associated with improved TO

Roh

Sci Rep Nature [13]

Korean unicentric database

395

Type: of gastrectomy: robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) vs. laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG)

RTG: 70.3%

LTG 75.7%

 

Severe complications

ND

 

Spolverato

J Surg Oncol [7]

International multi-institutional database

Gastric adenocarcinoma

910

 

35.3%

Age

H. pylori infection

Family history of GC

Diffuse subtype gastric adenocarcinoma

Other than T1 Stage

 ≤ 15 lymph nodes

ND

Included chemotherapy inside TO

Cibulas

Ann Surg Oncol [6]

National Cancer database

Curative Gastrectomy

34,688

Type of gastrectomy: partial, subtotal, and total gastrectomy

Neoadjuvant therapy: Chemotherapy receipt of neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant Chemotherapy for pT3-T4 and/or pN1-N2 disease

Surgical approach: ND

Timing of surgery: ND

Mortality 30 days and mortality 90 days registered but not included on TO

23.8%

Race white better

Insurance status private insurance

Mean “Crow fly” distance

Facility cancer program type better academic research

Case-volume better very high

Extent gastrectomy better partial

Low T/N-stage

No lymphovascular invasion

No 30 and 90 days mortality

 ≤ 15 lymph nodes

Yes case-volume per year quartiles TO

Low: 9.5%

Intermediate: 18%

High: 27.6%

Very high: 44.9%

Achievement of TO related to greater survival (TO/noTO) 57% vs 38%

TO attainment was significantly associated with reduced risk of death HR 0.82 p < 0.001

Levy

Ann Surg [14]

Population-based clinical-pathological database

1836

Gastric

22%

Age

Neoadjuvant surgery

Low T-stage

No GE junction tumor

 < 15 lymph nodes examined

Severe complications

ND

TO associated with survival 75% Vs 45% p < 0.001

  1. GC gastric cancer, TO textbook outcome, GE gastroesophageal, RTG robotic total gastrectomy, LTG laparoscopic total gastrectomy