Skip to main content

Table 1 Main characteristics and quality of the studies included in the meta-analysis

From: Clinical and prognostic significance of HIF-1α overexpression in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

First author

Year

Country

Gender

(male/female)

Number

Criteria used for high HIF-1α expression

Clinical features

OS analysis

Quality evaluation

Selection

Comparability

Outcome

Total points

Lin

2008

China, Taiwan

54/3

57

>60%

NR

Reported

3

0

2

5

Liang

2011

China

49/40

89

>25%

T/LN/D

Reported

3

1

3

7

Huang

2012

China

46/34

80

>4a

LN

Reported

2

1

3

6

Han

2012

Korea

20/13

33

>10%

NR

Reported

4

1

2

7

Zheng

2013

China

66/54

120

>5%

T/LN/D

Reported

4

1

2

7

Hwa

2015

Korea

17/8

25

>50%

NR

Reported

3

1

2

6

Zhu

2010

China

52/45

97

Positive staining

T/LN/D

Reported

3

1

3

7

Kang

2013

China

28/21

49

>10%

T/LN

Reported

4

1

3

8

Hong

2013

Australia

186/47

233

>10%

T/LN/D

Reported

4

1

2

7

Eckert

2010

Germany

60/20

80

>6a

T/LN/D/TNM

Reported

3

1

2

6

Fillies

2005

Germany

71/14

85

>5%

NR

Reported

2

0

2

4

Santos

2012

Brazil

56/10

66

>6a

T/LN/D/TNM

Reported

4

0

3

7

Mendes

2014

Brazil

48/8

56

>3a

T/LN/D/TNM

Reported

3

0

2

5

Eckert

2011

Germany

60/22

82

>6a

T/LN/D/TNM

Reported

2

1

3

6

Liang

2008

China

40/25

65

>10%

LN/TNM

NR

3

1

2

6

Naruse

2011

Japan

72/48

120

>4a

T/LN

NR

3

0

2

5

Zhang

2014

China

52/28

80

>4a

T/LN/D

NR

3

1

1

5

Vasconcelos

2015

Brazil

40/17

57

>10%

TNM

NR

2

1

1

4

  1. NR not reported, T tumor size, LN lymph node status, TNM TNM stage, D differentiation
  2. aThe final score for samples was calculated based on a combination of percentage of stained cells and staining intensity