Solitary fibrous tumor arising in the mesentery: a case report
© Bouhabel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 15 January 2011
Accepted: 31 October 2011
Published: 31 October 2011
Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare mesenchymal neoplasm usually found in the pleura, soft tissues and visceral organs. We describe one case arising in the mesentery, which is an exceptional localization.
A 71-year-old man was referred to our establishment for a painless hypogastric mass. Further investigation revealed a vascular tumor, which was resected en bloc. Pathological findings confirmed solitary fibrous tumor of the mesentery.
This is the second case of solitary fibrous tumor of the small intestine mesentery ever reported. It was managed by en bloc resection and close follow up considering the high risk of recurrence. Investigation should be made regarding the use of adjuvant systemic therapy to improve long-term survival for these patients.
Solitary fibrous tumor is a rare mesenchymal neoplasm first described in the pleura, in 1870, by Wagner . Postulated cells of origin comprise fibroblasts, myofibroblasts endothelial cells, as well as pericytes . It usually arises in the pleura, pericardium, soft tissues and visceral organs . We report a case with an unusual localization in the mesentery. To our knowledge, this case would be the second reported case arising in the small intestine mesentery [3–7].
At twelve months of follow-up, there was no recurrence of the tumor.
Solitary fibrous tumor arising in the mesentery is an extremely unusual location for this type of tumor.
These tumors arise mostly in serosal surfaces of the pleura and pericardium . Many extrapleural localizations have been previously reported including: retroperitoneum, deep soft tissues of proximal extremities (thigh, axilla), abdominal cavity, kidneys, trunk, and head and neck (including the orbit and meninges)  and only one previous case in the same localization ; mesentery of the small intestine.
Solitary fibrous tumors arise in patients with a median age of 40 to 60, and show no sex or race predominance. Our patient presented with a painless abdominal mass, which seems to be the case for most intra-abdominal SFT tumors .
From a strictly pathologic standpoint, great confusion exists in the literature regarding the origin, evolution and classification of solitary fibrous tumors. Indeed, solitary fibrous tumors and hemangiopericytomas (HPC) share many pathological findings. Overlapping nonspecific histologic features such as branching staghorn vessels, immunohistochemical CD34/CD99 reactivity, as well as ultrastructural pericytic, fibroblastic and/or myofibroblastic differentiation, renders difficult the differentiation of these tumors. The tendency is now one of considering HPC and SFT as being part of the same entity, with a broad morphological spectrum of differentiation.
Many tumors may contain areas mimicking SFT/HPC, therefore the differential diagnosis must be thoroughly reviewed and investigated. It comprises GIST, synovial sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, undifferentiated liposarcoma, myofibroblastoma, metastasis from a spindle-cell carcinoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), as well as low grade fibromyxoid sarcoma [2, 11].
Given that the specimen revealed cells strongly positive to CD34 antibody and focal CD99 membranous expression, the diagnosis was in favour of a solitary fibrous tumor [2, 11]. Moreover, immunohistochemical study with CD117 marker was performed and did not show any reactivity, excluding the possibility of GIST. Bcl-2 antigen study (positive in 30% of SFTs ) was not done, since it was not required for the differential diagnosis. Extensive sampling did not reveal any lipoblastic differentiation, thus excluding dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Immunhistochemistry did not show any S-100 or SMA positivity eliminating the possibility of MPNST and leiomyosarcoma. Monophasic synovial sarcoma is at times difficult to distinguish from SFT. Diffuse expression of CD34 and absence of EMA favours SFT. Low grade myofibroblastic sarcomas usually show focal myxoid stroma and are normally CD34 negative.
The histopathologic study is important to establish prognosis of the tumor, since there is no grading scale per se for SFT . Malignant nature is generally conveyed by a large tumor size (> 50 mm) [5, 10, 12] high cellularity, nuclear pleomorphism , mitotic activity (> 4 per 10 HPF), anaplasia, necrosis and hemorrhage [9, 10]. In our case, the presence of nuclear polymorphism with hypercellularity, increased mitotic activity, tumor size, as well as a focally infiltrative interface are consistant with a malignant nature for this tumor.
Treatment of intra-abdominal SFT/HPC usually implies complete en bloc surgical resection with negative margins [9, 10, 13, 14]. Radiotherapy is an adjunctive therapy that has been used in several patients. In our case, since the tumor was located centrally in the abdomen, surgical treatment without radiotherapy was favoured, in order to avoid the high risk of toxicity to the small bowel. The literature also reports the use of doxorubicin to achieve a partial response in patients with non resectable or advanced SFT's . Use of interferon-alpha has also been reported, with resulting stabilization of the tumor . However, no such reports exist for adjuvant systemic treatment.
Due to the rarity of solitary fibrous tumors in this particular location as well as the confusion regarding the pathological diagnosis, guidelines for treatment remain currently unclear. The outcome does not seem to be strongly related to the morphology of the tumor: even though tumors showing malignant features may behave aggressively, some tumors considered benign may recur and metastasize . The prognosis of SFT is not well known, but the rate of recurrence and metastases is quite high (up to 50%) , occuring even years later (ad 24 years, as reported by Rew and Allen in 1986 ). These tumors mainly spread haematogenously, and the lungs, liver and bone are the most common sites for metastases.
Solitary fibrous tumors are rare. Treatment consists in complete surgical resection. Considering that recurrence and metastases are common following surgery, long term follow up is necessary [13, 5]. There is currently an unmet medical need regarding adjuvant treatment to try to improve long-term survival.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and the accompanying images.
- Wagner E: Das tuberkelahnliche Lymphadenom (Der cytogene oder reticulirte Tuberkel). Arch Heilk (Leipzig). 1870, 11: 497-Google Scholar
- Gengler C, Guillou L: Solitary fibrous tumour and haemangiopericytoma: evolution of a concept. Histopathology. 2006, 48 (1): 63-74. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02290.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prathima KM, Harendrakumar ML, Srikantia SH, Maiya GL, Narayan V: Hemangiopericytoma of mesentery: a case report. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2003, 46 (1): 69-70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perez Cabanas I, De Miguel Velasco M, Reparaz Romero B, Ortiz Hurtado H: Hemangiopericytoma of the rectal mesentery. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1990, 77 (6): 449-454.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- West NJ, Daniels IR, Allum WH: Haemangiopericytoma of the sigmoid mesentery. Tech Coloproctol. 2004, 8: 179-181. 10.1007/s10151-004-0084-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakagawa T, Shinoda Y, Masuko Y, Ohshima T, Shirota K, Yoshida Y, Ogawa K, Uchino J: Hemangiopericytoma of the Sigmoid Mesentery: Report of a case with Immunohistochemical Findings. Surg Today. 1997, 27: 64-67. 10.1007/BF01366942.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lau MI, Foo FJ, Sissons MC, Kiruparan P: Solitary fibrous tumor of small bowel mesentery: a case report and review of the literature. Tumori. 2010, 96 (6): 1035-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shiba H, Misawa T, Kobayashi S, Yokota T, Son K, Yanaga K: Hemangiopericytoma of the Greater Omentum. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007, 11: 549-551. 10.1007/s11605-007-0099-x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pandey M, Kothari KC, Patel DD: Hemangiopericytoma: current status, diagnosis and management. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1997, 23: 282-285. 10.1016/S0748-7983(97)90534-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park M, Araujo D: New insights into the hemangiopericytoma/solitary fibrous tumor spectrum of tumors. Current Opinion in Oncology. 2009, 21: 327-331. 10.1097/CCO.0b013e32832c9532.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chan JKC: Solitary fibrous tumor - everywhere, and a diagnosis in vogue. Histopathology. 1997, 31: 568-576. 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1997.2400897.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaneko K, Shirai Y, Wakai T, Hasegawa G, Kaneko I, Hatakeyama K: Hemangiopericytoma Arising in the Greater Omentum: Report of a Case. Surg Today. 2003, 33: 722-724. 10.1007/s00595-003-2559-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Binder SC, Wolfe HJ, Deterling RA: Intra-abdomnal hemangiopericytoma: report of four cases and review of the literature. Arch Surg. 1973, 107: 536-543.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marino AW: Hemangiopericytoma: A Review of the Literature and Amplification. Dis Colon Rectum. 1959, 2: 438-445. 10.1007/BF02616934.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rew DA, Allen JP: Late recurrence of an abdominal haemangiopericytoma. J R Soc Med. 1987, 80 (8): 523-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.