Open Access

Renal cell cancer without a renal primary

World Journal of Surgical Oncology20108:18

DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-8-18

Received: 1 July 2009

Accepted: 22 March 2010

Published: 22 March 2010

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma has been increasing in incidence over the past two decades. Men are affected more than women and metastatic disease at presentation occurs in up to one third of patients. Metastasis can occur to virtually any organ, and involvement of multiple organs is not uncommon. To date, no reports have been found of metastatic disease without a renal primary. We present a case of renal cell cancer initially presenting as a subcutaneous mass with subsequent pancreatic and parotid gland metastases in absence of a primary renal source.

Background

In the United States, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has incidence in excess of 30,000 cases, with 12,000 deaths every year from the disease [1]. It occurs predominantly in males in their sixth to eight decade of life, and African Americans have a 10-20% higher incidence [2]. RCC is well known for its ability to metastasize to nearly every organ system of the body. Metastasis usually occurs several years after identification of the renal primary, but up to 30% of patients have metastatic disease on initial presentation [3]. The most common targets for metastases are lung, bone, lymph nodes, adrenal glands, brain, liver, and contralateral kidney [4]. In contrast, pancreatic and cutaneous involvement is exceedingly rare, occurring approximately 0.25-3% and 3.3% of the time, respectively [5]. Metastatic RCC is typically classified as either synchronous (detected at the same time as primary tumors) or metachronous (detected after a time interval from primary tumor, normally >6 months). In fact, it is not uncommon for metastatic pancreatic lesions to develop several years after nephrectomy [6]. RCC with pancreatic involvement can be a diagnostic challenge in differentiating between primary pancreatic cancer and metastatic disease. Our case exemplifies this diagnostic difficulty as the patient developed subcutaneous, pancreatic and parotid gland metastatic foci of RCC without ever having developed evidence of a renal primary.

Case presentation

In October, 2007 a 61-year-old woman presented to Saint Vincent's Medical Center with a 5 cm subcutaneous growth on her left upper extremity. Histological examination after surgical excision of the mass revealed a clear cell neoplasm consisting of polygonal cells with abundant clear cytoplasm, containing faint granular material. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated positive CD10 and AE1/AE3 staining. Pathologic interpretation of the mass was highly suggestive of metastatic RCC of the clear cell type. There were no lesions present anywhere else by physical examination or CT scan.

The patient was closely followed in an attempt to locate a primary renal source of disease with multiple imaging studies negative for a renal primary or other sites of metastasis. However, repeat CT scan 9 months later revealed an asymptomatic pancreatic mass. Endoscopic evaluation was performed with endoscopic ultrasound and fine needle aspiration (EUS/FNA). The study demonstrated a 2-cm hyperechoic, well-defined lesion in the body of the pancreas. The remaining pancreatic parenchyma was otherwise normal without ductal dilation or evidence of pancreatitis. Histomorphological analysis of the core biopsy samples yielded similar findings to those of the upper extremity mass. Additionally, an immuno-profile was focally strong for both CD10 and PNRA, which was again highly suggestive of renal cell carcinoma. A central pancreatectomy was performed in August 2008 and tissue samples were positive for PRNA, Vimentin, and CD10, correlating strongly with RCC. The patient continued periodic surveillance to identify a renal primary and further metastasis at three month intervals. Six months later, physical exam revealed left parotid gland enlargement and an MRI revealed a 1.6 cm enhancing mass in the left parotid gland. No other lesions were found on surveillance PET/CT scan at that time. The patient had a superficial parotidectomy and again, pathological analysis demonstrated a clear cell carcinoma that was identical to the previous subcutaneous and pancreatic specimens. The sample was sent for expert verification at an outside institution, which corroborated our findings. Currently, the patient is doing well and is undergoing surveillance at 6 month intervals. To date, a renal primary has not been found.

Conclusions

RCC has an annual incidence in excess of 30,000 cases in the United States and its greatest incidence occurs in males during the sixth decade of life [7]. The nature of this tumor distinguishes itself from other cancers in several respects. Namely, it's peculiar ability to metastasize to nearly every region of the body several years after initial presentation. It also differs from other neoplasms in its predilection for both hematogenous and lymphatic spread. We present the first recorded case of three metastatic foci without the identification of a renal primary, one of which mimicked a primary pancreatic neoplasm. As far as pancreatic cancers are concerned, metastatic tumors comprise about 3% of pancreatic tumors overall [7]. Initial clinical symptoms include abdominal pain, weight loss, fatigue, anemia, diarrhea, and jaundice. However, mass lesions often do not produce any recognizable symptoms and are only diagnosed when found incidentally on radiographic imaging, as was the case in our report. Furthermore, solitary pancreatic metastasis from RCC can mimic primary pancreatic neoplasms, including pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (islet cell tumor), solid pseudopapillary tumors, mixed ductal-endocrine carcinomas, ductal adenocarcinomas with clear cell features, perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (sugar tumor), or solid serous cystadenomas [8, 9]. Most notably RCC and clear cell primary tumors of the pancreas may show considerable overlap in both clinical setting and pathological appearance, making complete distinction between the two tumors very difficult without additional studies. Morphologically, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with clear cell features are composed of pleomorphic cells with abundant clear cytoplasm and well-defined cell borders. Nuclei are moderately pleomorphic with irregular borders and often eccentrically positioned. Chromatin varies from vesicular to coarsely granular and nucleoli are not prominent. Alternatively, nuclei of RCC tend to be round and uniform, with finely granular, evenly distributed chromatin. Depending upon the degree of differentiation, nucleoli may be absent, sparse, large, or prominent. Occasionally, there are very large nuclei lacking nucleoli or bizarre nuclei [10]. The architectural growth patterns of clear cell RCC can vary, ranging from sinusoidal and sheet-like solid patterns to alveolar, tubular, or acinar appearances. No luminal differentiation is apparent in the alveolar pattern but a central, rounded luminal space filled with lightly acidophilic serous fluid or erythrocytes occurs in the acinar pattern. Infrequently, clear cell RCC has a distinct tubular or tubulopapillary architecture.

Immunohistochemical studies are helpful to distinguish metastatic from primary pancreatic tumors. According to the literature, 90-100% of pancreatic adenocarcinomas express CK7 as well as CK8,13,18, and 19 [1113]. Even though CK20 is found in less than 20% of pancreatic cancers, most studies report the CD7+/CK20+ as the most common and the CK7+/CK20- as the second most common staining patterns [14], although the reverse has also been reported [11]. The coordinate staining pattern CK7-/CK20+ was found in up to ten percent of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. Glycoprotein tumor antigens CEA and CA19-9 are reported to be positive in a variety of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. As for clear cell RCC, lack of both CK7 and CK20 expression has been found [1517], although papillary and chromophobe RCC were reported to have some CK7 expression [1820]. CEA has been reported to be negative in all metastatic clear cell RCC to the pancreas [7]. Finally, vimentin staining is normally positive in RCC, occurring in >90% of cases, while it is non-reactive in more than 90% of pancreatic adenocarcinomas [21].

For patients with solitary pancreatic metastases, surgical treatment should be recommended because it is more effective than other treatments such as radiation and chemotherapy. The mean survival reported in the literature is only 1.3 years following metastatic focus resection [7], but 5 year survival rates as high as 68% have been documented [22].

In summary, this case describes the first documented report of metastatic RCC without the determination of a primary renal tumor. In the vast majority of cases, the primary renal lesion is found through subsequent radiographic surveillance, sometimes up to several years after the discovery of the initial metastatic lesion, which did not occur in our patient. The fact that this case presented with evidence of metastasis to three different sites (the subcutaneous tissue of the arm, the pancreas and the parotid gland) demonstrates the interesting ability of RCC to invade almost any organ and also reinforces the need for a thorough work-up to distinguish primary pancreatic neoplasm from another metastatic process. Although many cases are found incidentally from radiographic imaging obtained for other reasons, tissue sampling for pathological and immunohistochemical analysis is essential to help determine the tumor origin. When metastatic RCC is found, complete surgical resection should be the treatment of choice when medically feasible.

Consent

Informed Consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Pancreatic and Biliary Center N.Y

References

  1. Chow WH, Devesa SS: Contemporary epidemiology of renal cell cancer. Cancer J. 2008, 14 (5): 288-301. 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181867628.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Pascual D, Borque A: Epidemiology of kidney cancer. Adv Urol. 2008, 782381-Google Scholar
  3. Motzer RJ, Bander NH, Nanus DM: Renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1996, 335 (12): 865-75. 10.1056/NEJM199609193351207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Saitoh H, Hida M, Nakamura K, Shimbo T, Shiramizu T, Satoh T: Metastatic processes and a potential indication of treatment for metastatic lesions of renal adenocarcinoma. J Urol. 1982, 128 (5): 916-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ninan S, Jain PK, Paul A, Menon KV: Synchronous pancreatic metastases from asymptomatic renal cell carcinoma. JOP. 2005, 6 (1): 26-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kassabian A, Stein J, Jabbour N, Parsa K, Skinner D, Parekh D, Cosenza C, Selby R: Renal cell carcinoma metastatic to the pancreas: a single-institution series and review of the literature. Urology. 2000, 56 (2): 211-5. 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00639-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Thompson LD, Heffess CS: Renal cell carcinoma to the pancreas in surgical pathology material. Cancer. 2000, 89 (5): 1076-88. 10.1002/1097-0142(20000901)89:5<1076::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO;2-M.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Augustin H, Bacher H, Uggowitzer M, Ott A, Hubmer G, Mischinger HJ: Pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma mimicking insulinomas. BJU Int. 1999, 83 (1): 140-1. 10.1046/j.1464-410X.1999.00855.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ray S, Lu Z, Rajendiran S: Clear cell ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas: a case report and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004, 128 (6): 693-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Murphy WM, Grignon DG, Perlman EJ: Tumor of the Kidney, Bladder, and Related Urinary Structures. AFIP Atlas of Tumor Pathology. 2004, ; Series 4Google Scholar
  11. Duval JV, Savas L, Banner BF: Expression of cytokeratins 7 and 20 in carcinomas of the extrahepatic biliary tract, pancreas, and gallbladder. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000, 124 (8): 1196-200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldstein NS, Bassi D: Cytokeratins 7, 17, and 20 reactivity in pancreatic and ampulla of vater adenocarcinomas. Percentage of positivity and distribution is affected by the cut-point threshold. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001, 115 (5): 695-702. 10.1309/1NCM-46QX-3B5T-7XHR.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee MJ, Lee HS, Kim WH, Choi Y, Yang M: Expression of mucins and cytokeratins in primary carcinomas of the digestive system. Mod Pathol. 2003, 16 (5): 403-10. 10.1097/01.MP.0000067683.84284.66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chu P, Wu E, Weiss LM: Cytokeratin 7 and cytokeratin 20 expression in epithelial neoplasms: a survey of 435 cases. Mod Pathol. 2000, 13 (9): 962-72. 10.1038/modpathol.3880175.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kiremitçi S, Tulunay O, Baltaci S, Göğüş O: Diagnostic utility of cytokeratins 7, 10 and 20 in renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma. Turkish Journal of Pathology. 2008, 24 (3): 140-146.Google Scholar
  16. Mazal PR, Stichenwirth M, Koller A, Blach S, Haitel A, Susani M: Expression of aquaporins and PAX-2 compared to CD10 and cytokeratin 7 in renal neoplasms: a tissue microarray study. Mod Pathol. 2005, 18 (4): 535-40. 10.1038/modpathol.3800320.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Langner C, Wegscheider BJ, Ratschek M, Schips L, Zigeuner R: Keratin immunohistochemistry in renal cell carcinoma subtypes and renal oncocytomas: a systematic analysis of 233 tumors. Virchows Arch. 2004, 444 (2): 127-34. 10.1007/s00428-003-0948-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Leroy X, Moukassa D, Copin MC, Saint F, Mazeman E, Gosselin B: Utility of cytokeratin 7 for distinguishing chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from renal oncocytoma. Eur Urol. 2000, 37 (4): 484-7. 10.1159/000020172.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Abrahams NA, MacLennan GT, Khoury JD, Ormsby AH, Tamboli P, Doglioni C, Schumacher B, Tickoo SK: Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a comparative study of histological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features using high throughput tissue microarray. Histopathology. 2004, 45 (6): 593-602. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2004.02003.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Taki A, Nakatani Y, Misugi K, Yao M, Nagashima Y: Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study of 21 Japanese cases. Mod Pathol. 1999, 12 (3): 310-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaufmann O, Dietel M, Scherberich JE, Gaedicke G, Fischer P: Immunohistochemical differentiation of metastases of renal carcinomas versus other carcinomas with anti-gamma GT monoclonal antibody 138H11. Histopathology. 1997, 31 (1): 31-7. 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1997.5800813.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Tuech JJ, Pessaux P, Chautard D, Rouge C, Binelli C, Bergamaschi R, Arnaud JP: Results of duodenopancreatectomy for solitary pancreatic metastasis from renal cell carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1999, 6 (4): 396-8. 10.1007/s005340050138.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Wayne et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement