Painful swollen leg – think beyond deep vein thrombosis or Baker's cyst
© Arumilli et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 19 July 2007
Accepted: 18 January 2008
Published: 18 January 2008
The diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis of leg is very common in clinical practice. Not infrequently a range of pathologies are diagnosed after excluding a thrombosis, often after a period of anticoagulation.
This is a report of three patients who presented with a painful swollen leg and were initially treated as a deep vein thrombosis or a baker's cyst, but later diagnosed as a pleomorphic sarcoma, a malignant giant cell tumor of the muscle and a myxoid liposarcoma. A brief review of such similar reports and the relevant literature is presented.
A painful swollen leg is a common clinical scenario and though rare, tumors must be thought of without any delay, in a duplex negative, low risk deep vein thrombosis situation.
Painful swollen leg is a common clinical scenario. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) often presents as a painful swollen leg and prompt management is vital to prevent fatal pulmonary embolism. The common differential diagnoses include cellulitis and a ruptured baker's cyst . Rare pathologies with a similar clinical picture to venous thrombosis of calf  and dual pathologies have been reported [1, 3] including tumors . Careful evaluation is needed to avoid inappropriate management and vitally a catastrophic delay in initiating appropriate treatment. We report three case histories of patients managed initially as a DVT of calf or a baker's cyst and later referred to our centre with a provisional diagnosis of a soft tissue tumor.
A 59 year female was investigated for a possible venous thrombosis of calf at the emergency department after she presented with a painful swollen left proximal calf. She was categorized as a low risk for DVT on clinical examination. D-dimers were 260 ng/ml and Duplex imaging was equivocal. She was started on treatment dose of heparin.
After 3 weeks of anticoagulation there was evidence of a lump in the left popliteal fossa and ultrasound scan of the area revealed a solid soft-tissue mass. She had distal paraesthesia in the foot without any motor weakness. CT scan revealed a soft tissue lump behind knee & proximal calf and she was referred to our centre.
A 69 year male was seen for a swollen and painful right calf following a minor trauma. This was treated initially with physiotherapy and the pain settled. Two years later he was further investigated for a similar episode, this time to rule out a DVT. The D-dimers were normal and a Doppler scan ruled out a DVT, but a baker's cyst was diagnosed. Following this episode the symptoms never settled and he was later reviewed for a sudden increase in size of the calf 4 years later. There was an 8 × 8 cm diffuse but discrete swelling over the lateral aspect of his calf.
Painful swollen leg is a common clinical scenario for a wide range of pathology. The initial management in the majority is to start anticoagulation and arrange a venous duplex scan, as the priority is to rule out a DVT. But only one third of the first episodes of a venous thrombosis are spontaneous . Patients should be stratified into low, intermediate or high-risk categories before treating for a venous clot . A new evidence based protocol combining clinical probability and D-dimer evaluation has proven effective in deciding when to initiate anticoagulation . D-dimer levels as a stand-alone test for the diagnosis of DVT is not recommended as it can be elevated in many other conditions . When used along with the clinical risk assessment score, the combination had negative predictive values of 97–100% for a DVT [9, 10]. Contrast venography is the gold standard for venous disease  but is not performed routinely as it is invasive. Duplex scanning of limbs is the common alternative but has disadvantages of being highly operator dependent  and poor sensitivity for calf DVTs ranging between 54–93% .
In case of the first patient, a moderate risk for DVT clinically along with moderately elevated D-dimers prompted anticoagulation. But after an initial equivocal Duplex, a repeat scan or venography should have been performed to establish or exclude a DVT. There was some relief of pain which made both the patient and physician less concerned. Only after 6 months when the swelling was much worse, an alarm was raised. In the second patient a DVT was unlikely given the low clinical risk and the D-dimer level of 260 ng/ml. Further evaluation should have been done, as an alternate diagnosis was more likely. In her case the lump was much more proximal to be appreciated within 3 weeks of initial presentation. The combination of low pre test probability of a DVT along with an inconclusive Duplex scan in these patients must have prompted further investigations. In the final patient of this series, a Duplex was sensitive enough to diagnose a Baker's cyst but was unable to detect a co-existing solid soft-tissue swelling which was probably small by the time. A general ultrasound in this patient must have a given a better information regarding the underlying pathology.
The discovery of nonvascular disease is not an infrequent finding of duplex scan. Baker's cyst is the commonest non-vascular abnormality found in patients undergoing duplex scan for a suspected DVT (3%) . The other differential diagnoses include cellulitis, hematoma, tumors , venous or arterial aneurysms  and connective tissue disorders . Tumors are a rare but an important differential diagnosis in such patients. Sixty percent of soft-tissue sarcomas arise in the extremities, 70 % occur in the lower limb and mostly in the thigh. As a rule of thumb any mass over 5 cm in size arising beneath the level of deep fascia should be considered a sarcoma unless proven otherwise . On clinical examination of the calf a major difficulty is when a swelling is deep to the deep fascia making it difficult to appreciate as a lump. In a series of 200 patients investigated for venous disease, eight patients were found to have previously undiagnosed lower extremity masses of which three were malignant . Special investigations (angiography, CT or MR scanning) were necessary to establish diagnosis (sarcomas, lymphoma, aneurysm, hematoma, abscess and cyst) in 31% of patients referred as DVT to one unit over a 2 year period . Another issue complicating diagnosis is a coexisting venous thrombosis secondary to obstruction or stasis from an underlying local cause. Lewis et al reported a patient who had a popliteal vein thrombosis and 4 weeks later was found to have a leiomyosarcoma arising from the popliteal vein . In low risk patients when a duplex scan fails to reveal a thrombus especially in the calf, a general ultrasound would provide useful additional information. It is non-invasive and has an important role in differentiating a cystic and a solid swelling and its size thereby providing relevant information for further management .
The purpose of this case series is to highlight the need to be vigilant before diagnosing a DVT in low risk patients presenting with a painful swollen calf and make clinicians realize that d-dimer levels alone could be misleading as levels could be moderately elevated in other pathologies. A delay in diagnosing tumors could affect the overall prognosis hence further investigations or imaging should be considered without any delay.
The Authors would like to mention their special thanks to Ms. Kirsty Harper, Secretary to Mr.A.S.Paul (Senior Author), who has gathered the necessary confidential documents and worked hard for the completion of this report.
We thank all the patients for providing Consent for publication of details and illustrations in this case series.
- Langsfield M, Matteson B, Johnson W, Wascher D, Goodnough J, Weinstein E: Baker's cyst mimicking the symptoms of deep vein thrombosis: Diagnosis with venous duplex scanning. J of Vascular Surgery. 1977, 25: 658-662. 10.1016/S0741-5214(97)70292-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maksimovic Z, Cvetkovic S, Markovic M, Perisic M, Colic M, Putnik S: Differential diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2001, 129: 13-17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lewis D, Appleberg M: Unusual presentation of a rare venous tumour. ANZ J Surg. 2004, 74: 820-822. 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03157.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buchbinder D, Mc Cullough GM, Melick CF: Patients evaluated for venous disease may have other pathological conditions contributing to symptomatology. Am J Surg. 1993, 166: 211-215. 10.1016/S0002-9610(05)81058-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kyrle PA, Eichinger S: Deep vein thrombosis. The Lancet. 2005, 365: 1163-1174. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71880-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scarvelis D, Wells PS: Diagnosis and treatment of deep vein thrombosis. CMAJ. 2006, 175: 1087-1092.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anderson DR, Kovacs MJ, Kovacs G, Stiell I, Mitchell M, Khoury V, Dryer J, Ward J, Wells PS: Combined use of clinical assessment and D-dimer to improve the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected deep vein thrombosis (the EDITED study). J Thromb Haemost. 2003, 1: 645-651. 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00131.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heim SW, Schetman JM, Siadaty MS, Phibrick JT: D-dimer testing for deep venous thrombosis: A metaanalysis. Clin Chem. 2004, 50: 1136-1147. 10.1373/clinchem.2004.031765.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anderson DR, Wells PS, Stiell I, Macleod B, Simms M, Gray L, Robinson KS, Bormanis J, Mitchell M, Lewandowski B, Flowerdew G: Management of patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis in the emergency department: combining use of a clinical diagnosis model with D-dimer testing. J Emerg Med. 2000, 19: 225-230. 10.1016/S0736-4679(00)00225-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walsh K, Kelaher N, Long K, Cervi P: An algorithm for the investigation and management of patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis at a district general hospital. Postgrad Med J. 2002, 78: 742-745. 10.1136/pmj.78.926.742.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Killewich LA, Bedford GR, Beach KW, Strandness DE: Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. A prospective study comparing duplex scanning to contrast venography. Circulation. 1989, 79: 810-814.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller N, Satin R, Tousignant L, Sheiner NM: A prospective study comparing duplex scan and venography for diagnosis of lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis. Cardiovasc Surg. 1996, 4: 505-508. 10.1016/0967-2109(95)00148-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim-Gavino CS, Vade A, Lim-Dunham J: Unusual appearance of a popliteal venous aneurysm in a 16 year old patient. J Ultrasound Med. 2006, 25: 1615-1618.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakamura T, Tomoda K, Yamamura Y, Tsukano M, Honda I, Iyama K: Polyarteritis nodosa limited to calf muscles: a case report and review of the literature. Clin Rheumatol. 2003, 22: 149-153. 10.1007/s10067-002-0688-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Paul AS, Charalambous C, Maltby B, Whitehouse R: The management of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Current Orthopedics. 2003, 17: 124-133. 10.1054/cuor.2002.0314.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Braunstein EM, Silver TM, Martel W, Jaffe M: Ultrasonographic diagnosis of extremity masses. Skeletal Radiol. 1981, 6: 157-163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.