Open Access

Middle bile duct cancer with portal vein tumor thrombus

  • Mitsugi Shimoda1Email author,
  • Yukihiro Iso1,
  • Shigeki Tomita2,
  • Takahiro Fujimori2,
  • Koji Murakami3,
  • Tokihiko Sawada1 and
  • Keiichi Kubota1
World Journal of Surgical Oncology20086:48

DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-6-48

Received: 14 November 2007

Accepted: 10 May 2008

Published: 10 May 2008

Abstract

Background

Tumor thrombus in the portal vein is a common complication of hepatocellular carcinoma, but an extremely rare complication of common bile duct cancer.

Case presentation

A 78-year-old woman was referred to our department because of jaundice. Laboratory data showed severe liver dysfunction with high serum levels of total bilirubin and CA19-9. Computed tomography showed lesions in the middle bile duct and main portal vein. FDG PET scan and 3D imaging showed hot spots in the same location as those revealed by CT. Under a diagnosis of middle bile duct cancer with portal vein tumor thrombus, the patient underwent surgery. At laparotomy, the main tumor was found to be located in the middle bile duct with a tumor thrombus, 2 cm in diameter, in the main portal vein. The patient underwent pancreatoduodenectomy with thrombectomy. Histological examination showed that this thrombus had the same histological features as those of the main bile duct cancer (poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma). The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient is doing well without any signs of recurrence 18 months after surgery.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first report of successful resection of middle bile duct cancer with portal vein tumor thrombus.

Background

Bile duct cancer (BDC), classified as cancer of the middle or distal bile duct, was the 6th leading cause of cancer-related death in Japan in 2004 [1]. Surgical resection offers the only chance for cure, and the outcome is highly dependent on surgical skill. In many patients, however, BDC is unresectable because of associated distant metastasis or involvement of the portal structures or main artery.

Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is sometime detected in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) by preoperative imaging [2, 3]. Although the bile duct is adjacent to the portal vein anatomically, BDC is rarely complicated by tumor thrombus in the main portal vein (PV). Here we present the first reported case of successfully resected middle BDC complicated by PVTT.

Case presentation

A 78-year-old woman was admitted to our department with jaundice in July 2005. Laboratory data showed severe liver dysfunction with high serum levels of total bilirubin (7.2 mg/dl: normal less than 1.0 mg/dl) and CA19-9 (7600 U/ml: normal less than 30 U/ml). Computed tomography (CT) showed a mass in the middle bile duct and main PV (Figure 1a and 1b). Positron emission tomography with fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG PET) scan and 3D imaging showed hot spots in the main bile duct and main PV (Figure 2) and significant development of collateral vessels in the hepato-duodenal ligament. After reduction of serum total bilirubin, under a diagnosis of middle BDC with PVTT, the patient underwent surgery. At laparotomy, the main tumor was located in the middle bile duct, and a tumor thrombus 2 cm in diameter was present in the main PV. We performed pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with extraction of the PVTT by PV incision, because it was unclear whether the cancer had invaded the PV. Intraoperative ultrasound clearly demonstrated the PVTT (Figure 3). Macroscopically, there was a circular lesion obstructing the bile duct, with a fragile tumor thrombus 2 cm in diameter (Figure 4a,b). Histological examination showed that bile duct cancer was a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, T4, N2, M0 and stage IV, according to the AJCC classification [4], and the thrombus showed the same histological features as those of the main tumor (Figure 5a,b).
Figure 1

a and b. Computed tomography shows the PVTT (white arrow) and bile duct cancer (white dotted arrow).

Figure 2

a and b. A schematic figure, main tumor shows red arrow in the main bile duct and portal vein shows yellow arrow. FDG pet scan with 3-D imaging shows hot spots in the main bile duct (red arrow) and main portal vein (yellow arrow).

Figure 3

Intraoperative ultrasound clearly demonstrates the portal vein tumor thrombus.

Figure 4

a and b. The main tumor, 3 cm in diameter, was located in the middle bile duct (a: white arrow) (Figure 3a) and the tumor thrombus (b), 2 cm in diameter, was present in the main portal vein (Figure 3b).

Figure 5

a and b. Histologically, both the bile duct cancer (Fig. a) and tumor thrombus (Fig. b) show the features of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma.

The patient's postoperative course was uneventful. Adjuvant chemotherapy using Gemcitabine (1200 mg/day for 3 consecutive weeks with a rest in the 4th week) was instituted 3 months after surgery. Currently, she is doing well without any signs of recurrence 18 months after surgery.

Discussion

PVTT, which is occasionally observed in HCC, hilar CCA, pancreatic endocrine tumor and liver metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract cancer including colorectal cancer, is caused by direct cancerous invasion into the PV and is associated with poor prognosis [2, 3, 58].

HCC shows a high incidence of PV invasion, and is reportedly found in 64.7% of patients at autopsy [2]. The incidence of PVTT is reported to be 5.3–15.4% in patients who undergo liver resection [5, 6]. The median survival of patients with HCC and PVTT is only 2.4 months without treatment, whereas that in patients without PVTT is 24.4 months [9]. The hilar CCA also shows a high incidence of PVTT, and patients with this type show a slightly lower survival rate than patients with other types of CCA (intrahepatic CCA without portal vein thrombus) [3].

Between 1988 and 1997, 651 cases of BDC were resected in Japan with a 5-year survival rate of 23% for middle BDC and 32% for lower BDC [1]. However, there were no BDC cases complicated by PVTT. Generally, CT and abdominal ultrasound are helpful for preoperative diagnosis of PVTT [10, 11]. In the present case, FDG-PET scan combined with CT clearly demonstrated the main lesion with PVTT. Development of collateral veins due to portal occlusion was also clearly visualized. Although PVTT is extremely rare in BDC, on the basis of these findings we diagnosed this portal occlusion not as cancer invasion but as PVTT.

Recently, FDG-PET scan has been widely adopted for diagnosis of pancreato-biliary malignancy and metastatic liver tumors, and is reported to be useful for detection of extrahepatic metastasis [1217]. FDG-PET scan combined with CT will become a key examination for hepato-biliary pancreatic malignancies. Although PVTT due to other malignancies is caused by direct invasion of the PV and is usually connected to the main tumor, in the present case the connection between the BDC and PVTT was unclear and there was no clear direct invasion to the PV. Therefore, combined resection of the PV including the PVTT was not performed, and the PVTT was extracted by dividing the PV. Although histological examination was also unable to demonstrate invasion, it is likely that direct microscopic invasion to the PV would have been present, resulting in PVTT.

As mentioned above, the prognosis of malignancies associated with PVTT is usually poor. Our patient received standard adjuvant chemotherapy using gemcitabine, [18] and is currently doing well without any signs of recurrence 18 months after surgery.

Conclusion

We have described the first reported case of BDC with PVTT, with special reference to the diagnostic utility of FDG-PET scan. Even if the condition is advanced, surgical treatment combined with adjuvant chemotherapy may be feasible in selected patients.

Abbreviations

BDC: 

Bile duct cancer

PVTT: 

portal vein tumor thrombous

FDG-PET: 

Positron emission tomography with fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose

PV: 

Portal vein

HCC: 

hepatocellular carcinoma

CCA: 

cholangiocarcinoma, PD: pancreatoduodenectomy.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The written consent of the patient was obtained for publication of this case report

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Dokkyo University School of Medicine
(2)
Department of Surgical Pathology, Dokkyo University School of Medicine
(3)
P.E.T Center, Dokkyo University School of Medicine

References

  1. Nagakawa T, Kayahara M: Tandogan chiryoseiseki ga oshieru tandogsn no sindan to chiryo noarikata (in Japanese). Kanahara shuppan. 2005Google Scholar
  2. Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL, Wong J: Intrahepatic recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results of treatment and prognostic factors. Ann Surg. 1999, 229: 216-222. 10.1097/00000658-199902000-00009.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Isaji S, Kawarada Y, Taoka H, Tabata M, Suzuki H, Yokoi H: Clinicopathological features and outcome of hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 1999, 6: 108-116. 10.1007/s005340050092.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. AJCC Cancer staging manual. 2002, Springer-Verlag, 6
  5. Carnero Fernandez M, Morano Amado LE, Bodenlle Bello P, Calvo Iglesias F: Massive venous thrombosis with cardiac invasion as primary manifestation of hepatocarcinoma. An Med Interna. 2003, 20: 537-539.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yamada K, Soejima T, Sugimoto K, Mayahara H, Izaki K, Sasaki R, Maruta T, Matsumoto S, Hirota S, Sugimura K: Pilot study of local radiotherapy for portal vein tumor thrombus in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2001, 31: 147-152. 10.1093/jjco/hye029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Smith TM, Semelka RC, Noone TC, Balci NC, Woosley JT: Islet cell tumor of the pancreas associated with tumor thrombus in the portal vein. Mag Reson Imaging. 1999, 17 (7): 1093-1096. 10.1016/S0730-725X(99)00039-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee KF, Chu W, Lai PB: Portal vein tumor thrombus in colorectal liver metastasis. Am J Surg. 2005, 190: 364-365. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.04.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Llovet JM, Bustamante J, Castells A, Vilana R, Ayuso Mdel C, Sala M, Brú C, Rodés J, Bruix J: Natural history of untreated nonsurgical hepatocellular carcinoma: rationale for the design and evaluation of therapeutic trials. Hepatology. 1999, 29: 62-67. 10.1002/hep.510290145.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Alam H, Kim D, Provido H, Kirkpatrick J: Portal vein thrombosis in the adult: surgical implications in an era of dynamic imaging. Am Surg. 1997, 63: 681-684.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dodd GD, Memel DS, Baron RL, Eichner L, Santiguida LA: Portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis: does sonographic detection of intrathrombus flow allow differentiation of benign and malignant thrombus?. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995, 165: 573-577.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanajiri K, H Mitsui, T Maruyama, Y Kondo, S Shiina, M Omata: 18F-FDG PET for hepatocellular carcinoma presenting with portal vein tumor thrombus. J Gastroenterol. 2005, 40: 1005-1006. 10.1007/s00535-005-1667-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sugiyama M, Sakahara H, Torizuka T, Kanno T, Nakamura F, Futatsubashi M, Nakamura S: 18F-FDG PET in the detection of extrahepatic metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol. 2004, 39: 961-968. 10.1007/s00535-004-1427-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mansour JC, Schwartz L, Pandit-Taskar N, D'Angelica M, Fong Y, Larson SM, Brennan MF, Allen PJ: The utility of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose whole body PET imaging for determining malignancy in cystic lesions of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006, 10: 1354-1360. 10.1016/j.gassur.2006.08.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Heinrich S, Goerres GW, Schafer M, Sagmeister M, Bauerfeind P, Pestalozzi BC, Hany TF, von Schulthess GK, Clavien PA: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography influences on the management of resectable pancreatic cancer and its cost-effectiveness. Ann Surg. 2005, 242: 235-243. 10.1097/01.sla.0000172095.97787.84.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wakabayashi H, Akamoto S, Yachida S, Okano K, Izuishi K, Nishiyama Y, Maeta H: Significance of fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging in the diagnosis of malignancies in patients with biliary stricture. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005, 31: 1175-1179. 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.05.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Anderson CD, Rice MH, Pinson CW, Chapman WC, Chari RS, Delbeke D: Fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging in the evaluation of gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004, 8: 90-97. 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.10.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Thongprasert S: The role of chemotherapy in cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2005, 16: 93-96.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Shimoda et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement