Perianal eccrine adenocarcinoma
© Leung et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 20 January 2007
Accepted: 07 September 2007
Published: 07 September 2007
Eccrine carcinoma is a quite rare malignant tumor that typically arises from a normal sweat gland and that features a rather high recurrence rate subsequent to simple excision. Given its rather poor response to adjuvant therapy, wide excision of the lesion with tumor-free margins may offer a reasonable chance for long-term control of this neoplasm.
Herein, we report on an unusual case of perianal eccrine carcinoma, initially presenting as a perianal abscess.
Even though eccrine carcinomas would appear to be rare, when dealing with recurrent skin tumors or recurrent perianal fistulas, the possibility of eccrine carcinoma should be considered by consulting clinicians.
There are three types of sweat glands that occur over the skin surface: eccrine, apocrine and apoeccrine. Eccrine sweat glands are one of the major sweat glands found in humans. Such sweat glands are distributed over the entire body skin surface, with the greatest density being found on the palms of the hands and soles of the feet . Eccrine sweat glands are innervated by postganglionic sympathetic fibers, and their major function is thermoregulation via evaporative heat loss and electrolyte balance . The majority of perianal sweat glands are of the apocrine type .
Eccrine carcinoma is a rare, malignant sweat gland tumor, generally featuring a slow growth rate and a rather high local recurrence rate . Sweat gland carcinomas were first reported by Stout and Cooley in 1951 with the observation that, "sweat gland carcinoma often developed at the site of pre-existing nodules of longstanding and they have a propensity to metastasize" . The first large study pertaining to the classification of sweat gland carcinomas was published in 1968 by Berg and McDivitt . More recent attempts at classification of such carcinomas would appear to provide somewhat different results, with the relative appropriateness of such classification schemes remaining quite controversial at the time of writing . Appropriate sweat gland carcinoma classification is clearly important since each of the specific sweat gland carcinomas features its own characteristic biological behavior . Thus, appropriate classification of such sweat glands, and associated tumors, enables us to devise a specific and appropriate sweat gland tumor therapeutical plan, and also an associated precise prognosis, i.e. apocrine carcinomas are able to metastasize to regional lymph nodes and do so frequently, whereas eccrine carcinomas are typically not able to metastasize . The incidence of sweat gland carcinoma appears to be female predominant and usually involves individuals of middle to old age . Such a tumor is able to develop anywhere on the trunk of the body or on the extremities, even the eyelid  and nipple-areolar complex . Unfortunately, as far as we are aware, sweat gland carcinomas are often under diagnosed or misdiagnosed due to their clinical rarity . The clinical manifestation of eccrine carcinoma is destructive with a propensity for local recurrence [4, 8]. Lymph node involvement is typically rare for eccrine carcinoma but distal metastasis is not uncommon .
A-57-year-old female patient presented at our institution with an apparently slow growing and painful perianal mass, which had produced some serous discharge for the preceding several years. The woman denied any history of constipation or anal bleeding, and she also denied any history of major disease including malignancy. Digital examination revealed a huge (5 × 5 × 5 cm), well-defined solid tumor associated with a skin ulcer, which was located over the left posterior region of the buttock adjacent to the anus. Tracing back her surgical history, this patient had undergone perianal skin tumor excision twice previously, once in 1981 and again in 1992. On both occasions, this was due to the presence of a painful perianal mass.
Laboratory data, including complete blood count and relevant blood biochemistry, were unremarkable. Under the initial impression of a perianal fistula or perianal skin tumor, incision biopsy was performed. The biopsy specimen was sent for frozen section examination, which revealed malignant neoplasm with myoepithelial-like proliferation. Following this histopathology report, en-bloc excision was undertaken in order to excise the tumor with a gross margin of 2 cm (Figure 1B). The post-surgery wound was left to heal openly without resorting to flap closure (Figure 1C).
The tumor cells were characterized by the presence of mild to moderate nuclear pleomorphisms, occasional distinct nucleoli, not uncommon mitotic activity, and a variable amount of eosinophilic, basophilic or clear cytoplasm featuring focal tumor necrosis. Perineural invasion and lymphovascular space permeation were also noted (Figure 2C). Immunohistochemically, the proliferated stromal cells and peripheral cells of the tumor nest or glandular structures were focally positive for SMA. The luminal tumor cells and central cells of the tumor nests were variably positive for polyclonal CEA and CK7. All of the neoplastic cells were negative for EMA, CDX2 and TTF-1, and no evident tumor cell mucin production was seen on mucicarmine and DPAS staining. The cancer invaded the dermis and subcutis. The epidermis was spared and free of pagetoid involvement.
Surgery is the first choice for management of such eccrine carcinomas since this type of carcinoma typically features a poor response to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy . However, it has been reported that one patient with distal metastasis secondary to an eccrine tumor responded well to tamoxifen . Wide, deep surgical excision of the tumor, with verification of tumor-free margins, should offer a reasonable chance of long-term control of eccrine carcinoma . The use of Mohs micrographic surgery was proposed by Wildemore et al. recently in order to attempt to decrease the recurrence rate of this type of tumor when compared to conventional surgical excision practices . However, longer follow-up intervals are reportedly necessary.
For our patient, when dealing with the current tumor, we intended to review the histopathology slides prepared in 1992 from the patient's previous episode in order to compare presentations and determine whether any mistake may have been made previously regards microscopic interpretation of the prepared tissue slides.
Unfortunately, the relevant slides had been lost during transportation several years previously and we were denied such an opportunity. Following our review of the literature, as far as we were able to determine, there is one case report about a patient whose eccrine porocarcinoma could possibly have arisen from a long-standing benign eccrine poroma . Otherwise, no evidence suggesting the transformation of a benign eccrine tumor to a malignant lesion has ever been found.
As for the suspicious nodules present on this patient's chest X-ray, we suggested thoracoscopic biopsy as being appropriate and, subsequent to metastasis having been confirmed, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. However, this was refused by the patient.
Even though eccrine carcinoma is a clinical rarity, when dealing with recurrent skin tumors or recurrent perianal fistulas, the possibility of eccrine carcinoma should be considered by consulting clinicians. Such a tumor can be slow growing but does feature the potential for recurrence, as well as distal metastasis . A high index of suspicion and the taking of perisurgical frozen sections will likely elicit a greater diagnostic rate for this malady, and initial wide excision of the tumor with adequate margins should thus significantly reduce the likelihood of a secondary perianal procedure being necessary. Distal metastasis work-up should be performed routinely for patients afflicted with eccrine carcinoma. Although prognosis for eccrine carcinoma is somewhat guarded, repeated wide excision of the primary lesion may be necessary
Written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report.
- Jean L, Joseph L, Ronald P: Dermatology. Mosby. 2003, 1Google Scholar
- Stout A, Cooley S: Carcinoma of sweat gland. Cancer. 1951, 4: 521-536. 10.1002/1097-0142(195105)4:3<521::AID-CNCR2820040306>3.0.CO;2-E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berg JW, McDivitt RW: Pathology of sweat gland carcinoma. Pathology Annual. 1968, 3: 123-144.Google Scholar
- Cooper PH: Carcinomas of sweat glands. Pathology Annual. 1987, 22: 83-124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robson A, Greene J, Ansari N, Kim B, Seed PT, McKee PH, Calonje E: Eccrine porocarcinoma (malignant eccrine poroma): a clinicopathologic study of 69 cases. Am J Surg Path. 2001, 25: 710-720. 10.1097/00000478-200106000-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin C, Nunery WR, Martin RT, Collins BT, Heinz GW: Eccrine adenocarcinoma of the eyelid in a young patient. Ophthal Plast Reconstructive Surg. 1993, 9: 280-283.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Park BW, Kim SI, Lee KS, Yang WI: Ductal eccrine carcinoma presenting as a Paget's disease-like lesion of the breast. Breast J. 2001, 7: 358-362. 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2001.20029.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mehregan AH, Hashimoto K, Rahbari H: Eccrine adenocarcinoma. A clinicopathologic study of 35 cases. Arch Dermatol. 1983, 119: 104-114. 10.1001/archderm.119.2.104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chintamani , Sharma R, Badran R, Singhal V, Saxena S, Bansal A: Metastatic sweat gland adenocarcinoma: A clinico-pathological dilemma. World J Surg Oncol. 2003, 1: 13-10.1186/1477-7819-1-13.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sridhar KS, Benedetto P, Otrakji CL, Charyulu KK: Response of eccrine adenocarcinoma to tamoxifen. Cancer. 1989, 64: 366-370. 10.1002/1097-0142(19890715)64:2<366::AID-CNCR2820640204>3.0.CO;2-R.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wildemore JK, Lee JB, Humphreys TR: Mohs surgery for malignant eccrine neoplasms. Dermatol Surg. 2004, 30 (12 Pt 2): 1574-1579. 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30569.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morris DM, Sanusi ID, Lanehart WH: Carcinoma of eccrine sweat gland: experience with chemotherapy, autopsy findings in a patient with metastatic eccrine carcinoma, and a review of the literature. J Surg Oncol. 1986, 31: 26-30. 10.1002/jso.2930310105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim Y, Scolyer RA, Chia EM, Steven D, Ghabrial R: Eccrine porocarcinoma of the upper eyelid. Australasian J Dermatol. 2005, 46: 278-281. 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2005.00201.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.