Open Access

Local treatment in unresectable hepatic metastases of carcinoid tumors: Experiences with hepatic artery embolization and radiofrequency ablation

  • Vincent Meij1,
  • Johanna M Zuetenhorst2,
  • Richard van Hillegersberg1,
  • Robert Kröger3,
  • Warner Prevoo3,
  • Frits van Coevorden1 and
  • Babs G Taal2Email author
World Journal of Surgical Oncology20053:75

DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-3-75

Received: 01 July 2005

Accepted: 17 November 2005

Published: 17 November 2005

Abstract

Background

Hepatic metastases of carcinoid tumors cause incapacitating symptoms, but are usually diffuse and therefore unresectable. In this article we evaluate our experiences with local treatment techniques in the management of carcinoid patients with hepatic metastases and failing systemic treatment.

Methods

Fifteen consecutive carcinoid patients (11 men and 4 women; median age 60 years; range 45–71 years) were treated with either hepatic artery embolization (HAE) with Ivalon particles or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (percutaneously or intra-operatively). Follow-up evaluation was performed by CT scan and 24-hours urinary 5-HIAA excretions.

Results

A total of 18 HAE's was performed in 13 patients, while 10 lesions in 3 patients were treated with RFA. Median follow-up was 12.5 months (2 – 25 months). Median duration of symptoms was 22 months (8 – 193 months). Median overall decrease of 5-HIAA excretion 2 months after HAE was 32% with tumor regression on CT-scan in 4 patients (30%) and improvement of symptoms with a median duration of 15 months in 3 of them (23%). Embolization led to fatal hepatic failure in one patient. The 3 patients treated with RFA showed a decrease of urinary 5-HIAA values of 34, 81 and 93% respectively, with tumor regression in all of them. Improvement of symptoms was reported in 2 patients up to 25 months.

Conclusion

Liver embolization performed late in the clinical course had limited effect on symptoms and biochemical and radiological parameters. First experiences with RFA are favorable and might encourage to apply RFA more widely in metastatic carcinoid.

Background

Carcinoid tumors are derived from neuroendocrine cells and are usually slowly growing malignant tumors with distinct morphological characteristics. Most frequently, carcinoids are located in the appendix and ileum, but they are also known to arise from other sites, such as the bronchus and pancreas. The carcinoid syndrome is mostly due to hepatic metastases with the release of hormones, such as serotonin, directly into the systemic circulation and is characterized by symptoms of flushing, diarrhea, and wheezing. Eventually right-sided heart-valve fibrosis may develop.

There are several treatment options in metastatic disease. A multidisciplinary approach is advocated, in which gastroenterologists, medical oncologists and surgeons all have a role [1]. Systemic treatment is aiming at symptomatic improvement and reduction of hormonal secretion. Somatostatin analogues, interferon-alpha and application of meta-iodobenzylguanidin (MIBG), pharmacological or combined with radioactive MIBG, can result in long-lasting palliation [26]. However, tumor reduction is only occasionally described with these treatment modalities and as tumor load increases, symptomatic treatment gradually fails.

Local treatment of hepatic metastases of carcinoid is attractive because of the slow and localized growth pattern. When metastases are restricted to one lobe of the liver a hemihepatectomy or segmental resection is advocated. Unfortunately, the metastases are often multiple and diffuse and therefore resection is usually impossible due to anatomical location or number or due to inadequate viable liver tissue that would remain after surgery. If feasible, hepatic resection can be performed safely and provides effective palliation with considerable duration [7].

Another local treatment option is hepatic artery embolization (HAE), which not only may ameliorate symptoms but also might reduce tumor burden. An objective biochemical response of up to 52% and a median duration of effect of 12 months have been reported in cases of failing systemic therapy [8]. Reports on chemoembolization show a slightly better biochemical response and tumor response [9].

Although radio frequency ablation (RFA) is a fairly new technique, various studies have demonstrated its effectiveness in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinomas and hepatic metastases of colon carcinoma [10, 11]. In patients with diffuse hepatic metastasis RFA could achieve local tumor control while remaining enough functional liver tissue. Previous reports on RFA of hepatic carcinoid metastases are limited to case reports and small series but have indicated good local tumor control and acceptable morbidity [8, 1215].

Besides our experience in HAE, we have recently introduced the use of RFA in carcinoid patients. In this article we describe our experience of local treatment techniques in our institutional series of unresectable hepatic metastases of carcinoids and failing systemic therapy.

Patients and methods

Patients

Among 46 patients with carcinoid syndrome treated in the Netherlands Cancer Institute/ Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital between January 2000 and June 2002 we evaluated the data of all patients (n = 15) who were treated with either hepatic artery embolization or RFA.

Indications were progressive disease with systemic treatment and multiple hepatic metastases not amenable for resection, because of diffuse localization and bilobar involvement. Somatostatine analogues, interpheron-alpha and meta-iodobenzylguanidin, pharmacological or combined with radioactive MIBG could no longer ameliorate symptoms in these patients. Treatment with RFA was selected in patients where this was technically possible and all metastases could be treated with sufficient remaining functional liver tissue and with safe margins to the portal vein. Before treatment CT scans were performed and urinary 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5-HIAA) excretion was measured.

Embolization

The radiographic procedure was started with a diagnostic arteriography of the celiac axis and the superior mesenteric artery using the Seldinger technique to assess arterial anatomy. The portal vein patency was assessed on pre-embolization CT scan. Thereafter selective catheterisation was performed of the arterial supply of the right (segment 5–8) or left (segment 2–4) lobe pending on localization of the largest metastatic area. Ivalon particles 150–600 μ in polyvinyl alcohol mixed with an iodined contrast medium were injected until stasis was obtained. When tumor was present in both lobes of the liver, both lobes were embolized with an interval of several months starting with the lobe with the largest tumor load. In these cases, evaluation of symptoms and biochemical and radiological signs was assessed after the second embolization. After treatment vital signs, as well as hepatic and renal functions were monitored on the ward regularly. An adequate diuresis was ensured by careful hydration to avoid hepatorenal failure in the post-embolization period

Radiofrequency ablation

RFA was performed either intraoperatively or percutaneously. A 3.5 or 3.0 LeVeen Needle was used in combination with a 90 watts radio wave generator (Radiotherapeutics, USA). After ultrasound-guided insertion of the needle, sequential increase per minute of the radio wave current was performed until a maximum of 90 watts was achieved. An increase in resistance ultimately resulted in a "roll off", after which a second procedure at the same localization was restarted after a one-minute interval without current, to a maximum of 70% of the first achieved level. Each localization was thus treated, or a combination of multiple passes of the LeVeen needle was used to cover a metastasis larger than 4 cm until complete tumor necrosis was achieved.

During follow-up symptoms and measurement of urinary 5-HIAA's were evaluated at least every 3 months in our outpatient clinic. Tumor size and necrosis of tumor were evaluated by a CT scan at 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. In the patients who were treated with RFA an additional CT scan one month after the procedure was performed.
Figure 1

In patient 12 the initial CT-scan (figure 1A) of the liver shows multiple small nodules in both liver lobes. After HAE (figure 1B) the metastases are confluent and the total volume of the liver has decreased remarkably. Symptoms improved and a biochemical response was obvious.

Results

Eighteen hepatic artery embolizations were performed in 13 patients and 10 metastases were treated with RFA in 3 patients (table 1). There were 11 men and 4 women with a median age of 60 years (range 45 to 71) at time of treatment. The primary tumor was located in the ileocoecal area in 7 patients, rectum in 1 patient, lung in 3 patients, while in the remaining 4 patients the primary tumor was unknown.
Table 1

Characteristics of patients

No.

Age at local therapy

Duration of symptoms (months)

Gender

Primary tumour

Local therapy

Location of therapy

1

45

78

F

unknown

emb.

right

2

67

24

M

unknown

emb.

right

3

53

11

M

rectum

emb.

bilat.

4

71

67

M

lung

emb.

right

5

70

63

F

lung

emb.

right

6

60

26

M

ileocoecal

emb.

bilat.

7

62

24

M

appendix

emb.

left

8

60

11

F

ileocoecal

emb.

right

9

61

23

M

lung

emb.

right

10

71

10

M

unknown

emb.

bilat.

11

52

21

M

ileocoecal

emb.

bilat.

12

59

16

M

unknown

emb.

bilat.

13a

55

11

M

ileocoecal

emb.

right

13b

55

17

M

ileocoecal

RFA

left

14

47

8

F

ileocoecal

RFA

bilat.

15

60

193

M

ileum

RFA

bilat.

Indications for RFA were a vascular anomaly because of which HAE could not be performed in 1 patient. The other patients treated with RFA had very large lesions among several smaller ones, which made them more appropriate for RFA. The diagnosis of metastatic disease was known during a considerable time before local treatment (median duration of symptoms: 22 months, range: 8–193 months). As shown in table 2, 14 of the 15 patients had elevated urinary 5-HIAA excretion values with a median of 913 μmol/24 hrs (range 35 – 2618 μmol/24 hrs) (normal <40 μmol/24 hrs) prior to embolization. Median follow-up from completion of therapy was 12,5 months (range 6 – 25 months). Seven patients were dead at the time of analysis.
Table 2

Biochemical and radiological effects and effects on symptoms

No.

5-HIAA before

5-HIAA after 2 months

5-HIAA at follow-up

Effect on tumoursize on CT-scan

Effect on symptoms

Follow-up (months)

Complications

1

1736

unknown

unknown

unknown

=

2(†)

no

2

35

23

23

progression

4(†)

postembolization syndrome

3

120

160

42

progression

=

7(†)

hepatic failure

4

1924

1549

1432

progression

=

10(†)

no

5

111

75

123

progression (after 9 months)

=

11(†)

postembolization syndrome

6

1662

1564

2022

progression

=

12(†)

no

7

1740

1617

1604

progression (after 5 m)

=

14

abscess

8

913

140

566

regression

14

postembolization syndrome

9

1961

1531

2050

no change

=

14(†)

postembolization syndrome

10

72

33

118

regression

15

no

11

875

720

765

progression

=

15

no

12

1529

165

502

regression

↑↑

22

postembolization syndrome

13a

2618

1458

1186

regression

=

6*

no

13b

1186

777

1815

regression

=

7

no

14

91

6

32

regression

13

cholestasis

15

277

52

79

regression

25

no

(↓: worsening of symptoms, =: no change, ↑: improvement of symptoms, ↑↑: free of symptoms).

Embolization resulted in an overall median decrease of 5-HIAA excretion of 32% (range 0–89%) at first follow-up. In 3 patients, (23%; 95%-confidence interval: 5–54%) the decrease after embolization was more than 50% and met the criteria of biochemical response (patient 8, 10 and 12). In these 3 patients, symptoms improved, including patient 12 who were free of symptoms after bilateral embolization. This symptomatic improvement in the patients with biochemical response was still present at follow-up of 14, 15 and 22 months respectively. In the remaining ten patients only a minimal biochemical response was achieved with no effect on symptoms.

Tumor regression on CT scan was present in 4 patients, which corresponded with symptomatic improvement in three of them. In 7 patients CT-scans revealed progression and in one there was no change in tumor size. In one patient radiological evaluation could not be performed as this patient died after two months because of cardiac failure.

Postembolization syndrome, characterized by elevated levels of transaminases, lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase combined with fever, occurred in 5 patients. All recovered within 10 days. More serious complications occurred in 2 cases. In one patient (nr.7) a necrotic tumor metastasis was infected, for which treatment with intravenous antibiotics and abscess drainage was needed. After embolization of the left artery in another patient (nr.3), embolization of the right hepatic artery was performed after 5 months, which led to fatal hepatic failure 2 months later. Six other patients died during follow-up because of non-intervention related problems after 2 to 14 months: right sided cardiac failure (n = 2), progressive disease (n = 2), carcinoid crisis with renal failure (n = 1) and pneumonia (n = 1).
Figure 2

This slide of the CT-scan of patient 14 shows one dominant metastasis in the right liver lobe, but several other small nodules are present (figure 2A). After RFA necrosis with typical cystic appearance developed (figure 2B).

Treatment with RFA induced a biochemical response in 2 out of 3 patients with a 5-HIAA reduction of 81% and 93%. They also experienced a radiological response, and a symptomatic improvement. Patient 14 underwent RFA for one large and several smaller lesions. Patient 15 underwent a resection of segment 6 and 7, because of a large lesion of 7 cm in diameter and RFA of 5 other lesions. In the patient with the longest follow-up the decrease in 5-HIAA excretion after 26 months was still 71% and symptoms were minimal without additional systemic treatment.

In patient 13 with a favorable response to embolization of the right hepatic artery, embolization of the left hepatic artery was technically impossible because of a vascular anomaly. He was subsequently treated with multiple passes of RFA percutaneously for two large lesions (6 and 7 cm in diameter) in the let lobe under spinal anesthesia leading to a further reduction in 5-HIAA excretion. However, although CT scans after RFA showed no recurrence of tumor, duration of decreased 5-HIAA values lasted only 3 months and a relief of symptoms could not be obtained.

No serious adverse effects occurred after RFA. In one patient (nr.14) post-operative cholestasis was present. A magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography revealed a minor stenosis of the common bile duct. Symptoms completely recovered after 2 months and hepatic values returned to normal values after 3 months, without additional treatment.

Discussion

In carcinoid tumors with liver metastases patients suffer from the production of vasoactive hormones. Various systemic treatments are available to diminish the incapacitating symptoms of the carcinoid syndrome. Somatostatin analogues are widely applied and reduce these symptoms in approximately 70%, while a biochemical response is achieved in 42% up to 72% and a duration of up to a year [2, 6]. Interferon-alpha has demonstrated similar effects [3]. Application of meta-iodobenzylguanidin (MIBG), in a pharmacological dosage or combined with radioactive MIBG, can give long-lasting palliation [4, 5]. Local treatment of the liver, however, remains favorable due to reduction of the tumor load. The metastases are usually not amenable for resection, but HAE and the newer technique of RFA might be effective in the treatment of these patients.

Results of local treatment of this tumor are specifically interesting because of its histological characteristics. Arterial hypervasculation of liver metastases from carcinoid tumors argues in favor of hepatic arterial embolization. In addition, it is thought that RFA might have a specific effect on carcinoid tumors, because of the increased conduction of frictional heating in the hypervascular tissue, resulting in more extensive coagulative necrosis.
Figure 3

CT-scan of patient 13 reveals several small and larger metastases in both liver lobes (figure 3A). HAE of the right liver lobe resulted in fair tumor reduction (figure 3B). Two large metastases in the left liver lober were treated by RFA and show characteristic cystic appearance (figure 3C). The end result six months after the RFA treatment shows a significant decrease of tumor mass in both liver lobes (figure 3D).

Results of HAE and chemoembolization in earlier reports are variable [8, 1619]. Symptomatic improvement after HAE is reported to occur in 64% to 90% [1719]. Reports on chemoembolization show a slightly better biochemical and tumor response [9, 16]. In our series, however, a symptomatic improvement and a corresponding objective biochemical response are only seen in 3 of 13 (23%) patients treated with HAE. The median decrease of urinary 5-HIAA excretion was 32%. It can be hypothesized that HAE was applied to late in the clinical course. The optimal moment of embolization in the clinical course has been discussed in a Swedish study of 29 patients with carcinoid syndrome, but early embolization appeared to be as effective as late embolization [8]. In addition, side effects in our series were impressive leading to a protracted recovery in several cases. It must be noted that all patients had a considerable duration of symptoms before treatment (median 22; range 8 – 193) and systemic therapy was failing. Remarkably, the 3 patients that did benefit from this treatment had a relatively short duration of symptoms (10, 11 and 16 months). This suggests that embolization in an earlier stage might be more effective.

The question is if the same holds true for RFA. RFA might offer a more simple local treatment compared to HAE. The good local tumor control with a satisfactory duration of effect on symptoms has been suggested in several reports of carcinoid patients [1215]. Although the experience is limited to small series, this may indicate that an early intervention with RFA is favorable.

In our report the three patients treated with RFA showed an impressive biochemical response. RFA could ameliorate symptoms in 2 of three patients with duration of over 13 and 25 respectively. Although the measured 5-HIAA values before treatment in these 2 patients were relatively low, they suffered from incapacitating symptoms at this point and a considerable decrease in 5-HIAA values as well as improvement of symptoms could be reached after RFA. Complications are reported to be minimal and include hepatic failure, hepatic abscess and hepatic infarction [10, 12]. In our report one case of transient cholestasis occurred after RFA. In our series RFA is a safe and, when performed percutaneously, a minimally invasive procedure which may provide good local tumor control. Although these results are only first experiences, the excellent biochemical response and duration of symptomatic improvement encourage considering this technique as a treatment in cases of metastatic carcinoid syndrome.

Difficulty in evaluating local ablation methods lies in the fact that patients with advanced stage carcinoid syndrome all have specific characteristics, e.g. duration and degree of symptoms, localization of hepatic metastases and site of the primary tumor. To further explore the possibilities and indications of local treatment options all these factors should be taken account for in future studies.

Conclusion

We find these results encouraging to broaden the indication of treatment with RFA and to reconsider the time of treatment with embolization. The treatment of carcinoid syndrome remains a challenge for the physician and all therapeutic options must be considered carefully.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute/ Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
(2)
Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
(3)
Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/ Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital

References

  1. Caplin ME, Buscombe JR, Hilson AJ, Jones AL, Watkinson AF, Burroughs AK: Carcinoid tumor. Lancet. 1998, 352: 799-805. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)02286-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kvols LK, Moertel CG, O'Connell MJ, Schutt AJ, Rubin J, Hahn RG: Treatment of the malignant carcinoid syndrome. Evaluation of a long-acting somatostatin analogue. N Engl J Med. 1986, 315: 663-666.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Veenhof CH, de Wit R, Taal BG, Dirix LY, Wagstaff J, Hensen A, Huldij AC, Bakker PJ: A dose-escalation study of recombinant interferon-alpha in patients with a metastatic carcinoid tumor. Eur J Cancer. 1992, 28: 75-78. 10.1016/0959-8049(92)90389-J.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Taal BG, Hoefnagel CA, Valdes Olmos RA, Boot H, Beijnen JH: Palliative effect of metaiodobenzylguanidine in metastatic carcinoid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 1996, 14: 1829-1838.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Zuetenhorst H, Taal BG, Boot H, Valdes Olmos R, Hoefnagel C: Long-term palliation in metastatic carcinoid tumors with various applications of meta-iodobenzylguanidin (MIBG): pharmacological MIBG, 131I-labelled MIBG and the combination. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999, 11: 1157-1164.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ricci S, Antonuzzo A, Galli L, Orlandini C, Ferdeghini M, Boni G, Roncella M, Mosca F, Conte PF: Long-acting depot lanreotide in the treatment of patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors. Am J Clin Oncol. 2000, 23: 412-415. 10.1097/00000421-200008000-00020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Que FG, Nagorney DM, Batts KP, Linz LJ, Kvols LK: Hepatic resection for metastatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. Am J Surg. 1995, 169: 36-42. 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80107-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Eriksson BK, Larsson EG, Skogseid BM, Lofberg AM, Lorelius LE, Oberg KE: Liver embolizations of patients with malignant neuroendocrine gastrointestinal tumors. Cancer. 1998, 83: 2293-2301. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981201)83:11<2293::AID-CNCR8>3.0.CO;2-E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Diamandidou E, Ajani JA, Yang DJ, Chuang VP, Brown CA, Carrasco HC, Lawrence DD, Wallace S: Two-phase study of hepatic artery vascular occlusion with microencapsulated cisplatin in patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors. Am J Roentgenol. 1998, 170: 339-344.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Iannitti DA, Dupuy DE, Mayo-Smith WW, Murphy B: Hepatic radiofrequency ablation. Arch Surg. 2002, 137: 422-426. 10.1001/archsurg.137.4.422.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wong SL, Edwards MJ, Chao C, Simpson D, McMasters KM: Radiofrequency ablation for unresectable hepatic tumors. Am J Surg. 2001, 182: 552-557. 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00813-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Berber E, Flesher N, Siperstein AE: Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of neuroendocrine liver metastases. World J Surg. 2002, 26: 985-990. 10.1007/s00268-002-6629-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Wessels FJ, Schell SR: Radiofrequency ablation treatment of refractory carcinoid hepatic metastases. J Surg Res. 2001, 95: 8-12. 10.1006/jsre.2000.5988.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hellman P, Ladjevardi S, Skogseid B, Akerstrom G, Elvin A: Radiofrequency Tissue Ablation Using Cooled Tip for Liver Metastases of Endocrine Tumors. World J Surg. 2002, 26: 1052-1056. 10.1007/s00268-002-6663-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Siperstein AE, Rogers SJ, Hansen PD, Gitomirsky A: Laparoscopic thermal ablation of hepatic neuroendocrine tumor metastases. Surgery. 1997, 122: 1147-1154. 10.1016/S0039-6060(97)90221-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ruszniewski P, Rougier P, Roche A, Legmann P, Sibert A, Hochlaf S, Ychou M, Mignon M: Hepatic arterial chemoembolization in patients with liver metastases of endocrine tumors. A prospective phase II study in 24 patients. Cancer. 1993, 71: 2624-2630.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Schell SR, Camp ER, Caridi JG, Hawkins IF: Hepatic artery embolization for control of symptoms, octreotide requirements, and tumor progression in metastatic carcinoid tumors. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002, 6: 664-670. 10.1016/S1091-255X(02)00044-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Carrasco CH, Charnsangavej C, Ajani J, Samaan NA, Richli W, Wallace S: The carcinoid syndrome: palliation by hepatic artery embolization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986, 147: 149-154.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mitty HA, Warner RR, Newman LH, Train JS, Parnes IH: Control of carcinoid syndrome with hepatic artery embolization. Radiology. 1985, 155: 623-626.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Meij et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement