Silencing of mutant p53 by siRNA induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human bladder cancer cells
© Zhu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 7 July 2012
Accepted: 6 January 2013
Published: 28 January 2013
p53 is the most frequently mutated tumor-suppressor gene in human cancers. It has been reported that mutations in p53 result not only in the loss of its ability as a tumor suppressor, but also in the gain of novel cancer-related functions that contribute to oncogenesis. The present study evaluated the potential of silencing of mutant p53 by small interfering RNA in the treatment of bladder cancer cells in vitro.
We used the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay to assess cell viability and flow cytometry to detect cell cycle alterations and apoptosis. The related molecular mechanisms were assessed by western blotting. We also used the MTT assay and flow cytometry to investigate if silencing of mutant p53 by knockdown with small interfering (si)RNA would change the sensitivity to cisplatin treatment.
Using 5637 and T24 human bladder cancer cell lines characterized by mutations in p53, we found that silencing of the mutant p53 by RNA interference induced evident inhibition of cell proliferation and viability, which was related to the induction of G2 phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Moreover, our study also showed that the p53-targeting siRNA cooperated with cisplatin in the inhibition of bladder cancer cells.
These findings suggest that RNA interference targeting mutant p53 may be a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of bladder cancer.
KeywordsMutant p53 RNA interference Bladder cancer Cisplatin Apoptosis
Bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer in men, with an estimated 73,510 new cases of and 14,880 deaths from bladder cancer in the USA In 2012 . Although chemotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of advanced tumors [2, 3], cisplatin-containing combination chemotherapy for metastatic disease achieves only a median survival of up to 14 months , and the associated side-effects induced by its lack of specificity for tumor cells remain a challenging problem. Therefore, novel therapeutic strategies for the treatment of advanced bladder cancer are urgently required.
The well-known tumor suppressor p53 (encoded by the human gene TP53), which functions primarily as a transcription factor, plays a vital role in protecting cells from a variety of cellular stresses, including DNA damage and oncogene activation. These stresses trigger the accumulation of p53 protein and activate its transcriptional activity, which prevents cell transformation by inducing cell cycle arrest, senescence, apoptosis, DNA repair, or autophagy [5, 6]. TP53 mutations occur in approximately half of all human cancers, and the majority abrogates the sequence-specific DNA-binding activity of the p53 protein, which constitutes a corner-stone in tumorigenesis [7–9]. Moreover, these mutations usually exert cancer-promoting effects, not only by dominant-negative inactivation of the remaining wild-type allele [10, 11], but also through authentic oncogenic gain-of-function activities, which include a wide range of newly acquired oncogenic properties that are not found in the wild-type p53, such as increased genomic instability and cell proliferation, augmented invasion and metastasis, and drug resistance and inhibition of apoptosis , underlying the evidence for the association of TP53 mutations with poor clinical outcome in a variety of cancer types. In support of the gain-of-function hypothesis, stable or conditional knockdown of endogenous p53 mutants in various human cancer cell lines were shown to reduce their proliferation rate and chemoresistance in vitro, and their ability to form tumors in nude mice [13, 14].
Alterations in the p53 gene and its pathways are usually implicated in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (T2-T4) and advanced stages, and are associated with augmented angiogenesis, invasiveness, metastasis, recurrence, and consequent poor prognosis [15, 16]. However, there have been conflicting findings on whether p53 mutations confer increased responsiveness or resistance to cisplatin-based systemic chemotherapy in bladder cancer . In this study, we chose as models two bladder cancer cell lines, T24 and 5637, which both have p53 mutations. The T24 cell line was found to contain a p53 mutation with an in-frame deletion of tyrosine 126 , while the 5637 cells carried the p53R280T mutant . Our study showed that knockdown of these p53 mutants by small interfering (si)RNA not only induced cell cycle arrest and cell apoptosis in T24 and 5637 bladder cancer cell lines, but also cooperated with cisplatin in the inhibition of these cancer cells, suggesting that siRNAs may serve as alternative agents for the treatment of bladder cancer by targeting mutant p53.
Sequences of RNA and primers used in this study
Cell culture and transfection
The human bladder cancer cell lines 5637 and T24 (Shanghai Institute of Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Science, Shanghai, China) were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 mg/l streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 maintained at 37°C. The day before transfection, cells were plated in growth medium without antibiotics at a density of 30–40%. Transfections of double-stranded (ds)RNA were carried out using transfection reagent (Lipofectamine 2000; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. Mock groups were treated with the transfection reagent only. All cell groups were incubated for 24 or 48 hours. Cell images were taken using a phase-contrast microscope at ×100 magnification (Olympus, Japan).
Real-time quantitative PCR
Total RNA was extracted (TRIzol reagent; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) from the three groups of cells transfected for 48 hours (mock group, 50 nmol/l siCon, and 50 nmol/l siP53) and reverse transcribed using oligo(dT) primers and Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MLV) reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The resulting cDNA was amplified in a real-time PCR system (ABI Prism 7500; Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) using a commercial reagent (SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ Takara, Dalian, China). Values are expressed as fold difference compared with the mock group. Primer sequences for p53 and GADPH are shown in Table 1.
Western blotting analysis
Briefly, cells were harvested at 48 hours after dsRNA treatment as described above, washed, and lysed with lysis buffer. Protein concentration in the resulting lysate was determined using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Pierce Biotechnology Inc., Rockford, IL, USA). Appropriate amounts of protein (30–50 μg) were resolved by electrophoresis in 8 to 12% Tris-glycine polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked and then incubated overnight with the appropriate primary antibody at dilutions specified by the manufacturer. They were next washed three times in 15 ml Tris-buffered saline with Triton (TBS-T) and incubated with the corresponding horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody at 1:1000 dilution in TBS-T for 1 hour. The membranes were washed three times for 5 minutes each with 15 ml TBS-T, then the bound secondary antibody was detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) system (Pierce Biotechnology Inc.).
Cell growth/viability assay
Proliferation of cells was determined by the (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Approximately 3000 to 8000 (depending on how long they would be cultured) cells were plated in each well of a 96-well plate. After overnight incubation, the cells were treated with the appropriate dsRNA (mock, 50 nmol/l siCon, or 5–100 nmol/l siP53) for 24, 48, or 72 hours, or with the dsRNA (50 nmol/l siCon or siP53) for 24 hours, followed by incubation for 48 hours with or without 1 μg/ml cisplatin. At the various times after treatment, the medium was removed and MTT (20 μl of a 5 mg/ml solution) was added to each well, and plates were incubated at 37°C for 4 hours. After that, the plates were spun in a centrifuge, and the purple-colored formazan precipitate in each well was dissolved in 150 μl of dimethyl sulfoxide. Absorbance was measured at 490 nm in an absorbance reader (MRX II ; DYNEX Technologies, Chantilly, VA, USA). The reduction in viability of each group was expressed as a percentage of the mock or siCon cells, which were considered to be 100% viable.
Cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry
Cell cycle analysis was performed using a commercial kit (Coulter DNA Prep™ Reagents Kit; Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA). Cells were plated in six-well plates and incubated overnight before treatment (mock, 50 nmol/l siCon and 50 nmol/l siP53 for 48 hours or 50 nmol/l siCon/siP53 for 24 hours with cisplatin or not for 48 hours-). Following treatment, cells were harvested, then washed twice with pre-chilled PBS and resuspended in 100 μl PBS at a concentration of 1×106 cells/ml. Each cell sample was mixed with 100 μl DNA Prep LPR (contained in Coulter DNA Prep™ Reagents Kit), gently mixed by vortex and incubated in the dark at room temperature (25°C) for 20 minutes. Then each was mixed with 1 ml of stain (DNA Prep Stain; contained in Coulter DNA Prep™ Reagents Kit), gently mixed by vortex and again incubated in the dark at room temperature (25°C) for 20 minutes. Finally, cell cycle analysis was performed within 1 hour using flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter FC500 Flow Cytometry System with CXP Software; Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA), and the raw data was analyzed by Multicycle for Windows (Beckman Coulter).
Detection of apoptotic cells by flow cytometry
A quantitative assessment of apoptosis was made by determining the percentage of cells with highly condensed or fragmented nuclei. Cells were harvested at 48 hours after dsRNA treatment (mock, 50 nmol/l siCon, or 50 nmol/l siP53) as described above, washed twice with pre-chilled PBS, and resuspended in 100 μl 1 × binding buffer at a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/ml. Double staining with fluorescein isothiscyanate (FITC)-conjugated annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) was performed (Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. Cell apoptosis analysis was performed within 1 hour by flow cytometry as described above.
All values are expressed as means ± SD. Statistical significance was compared between treatment groups and controls using Student’s t test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Silencing of p53 mutants in bladder cancer cells
Knockdown of mutant p53 inhibits the growth and viability of 5637 and T24 cells
Silencing of mutant p53 induces G2-phase cell cycle arrest in bladder cancer cells
Silencing of mutant p53 induces cell apoptosis in bladder cancer cells
Accordingly, activation of caspase 9 and caspase 3 and cleavage of PARP, which represent one of the final steps of the proteolytic caspase cascade and reliably indicate ongoing apoptosis, were present in siP53-treated 5637 cells (Figure 6B).
Silencing of mutant p53 cooperates with cisplatin in producing inhibition of bladder cancer cells
Cisplatin is the main chemotherapy drug for advanced bladder cancer. As explained in the Introduction, there have been conflicting findings as to whether p53 mutations confer increased responsiveness or increased resistance to cisplatin-based systemic chemotherapy in bladder cancer . Thus, we used MTT assay to determine the combined effects of siP53 and cisplatin on 5637 bladder cancer cells.
Mutations in the TP53 gene, encoding the p53 tumor suppressor, are arguably the most common type of gene-specific alterations in human cancer. This emphasizes the pivotal role of p53 as a major mainstay of the body’s built-in anticancer defense mechanisms. As the field of p53 research evolves, it is increasingly evident that many p53 mutants not only lose their own tumor-suppressive functions and acquire dominant-negative activities over the remaining wild-type allele, but also gain new oncogenic properties that are not present in wild-type p53; this phenomenon is termed the ‘gain-of-function hypothesis’. For instance, overexpression of p53 mutants in cultured cells was shown to interfere with apoptosis, enhance proliferation, and increase resistance of the cells to chemotherapy [22–24]. Moreover, transfection of mutant p53 into TP53-null cells was shown to enhance their ability to form tumors in mice . Therefore, whereas wild-type p53 is a potent tumor suppressor, cancer-associated p53 mutants possess the attributes of oncogenes, suggesting that knockdown of mutant p53 may restrain or reverse the process of oncogenesis.
Recently, therapeutics based on RNA interference (RNAi) have become powerful and useful methods for the treatment of many diseases, including cancer, because of the high specificity, high efficacy and low toxicity of the RNAi trigger, small dsRNA [26, 27]. Stable or conditional knockdown of endogenous mutant p53 by siRNAs in various human cancer cell lines, such as lung, breast, and colon cancer cells, has been reported to reduce their growth rate and chemoresistance in vitro, and their ability to form tumors in nude mice [13, 14, 28]. A recent study also obtained consistent results showing that siRNA targeting mutant p53 could induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human prostate cancer cells . In the current study, we used siRNAs that targeted p53 mutants to transfect human bladder cancer cell lines expressing only p53 mutants endogenously, and found that the transfection resulted in suppressed cell growth and viability via induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death.
In numerous cancer types, mutations in TP53 are strongly associated with high expression levels of the proliferation-associated gene cluster, comprised mainly of the genes that participate in the core processes of the cell cycle . Moreover, several p53 mutants were recently shown to repress wild-type p53 target genes, which encode pivotal cell cycle inhibitors (such as p21 and GADD45α (growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible 45α)), leading to alteration of cyclins/CDKs and an increased proliferation rate . Whereas overcoming the G2/M checkpoint to initiate mitosis requires cyclin B/CDK1 to be activated, cyclin A seems to be required for both S-phase and M-phase . Cyclin A/CDK2 drives G2-phase cells into mitosis, and is a rate-limiting component required for entry into mitosis . Our analysis of cell cycle-related proteins showed that in the siP53-treated cells, there was significantly decreased expression of both cyclin B1 and cyclin A and reduced phosphorylation of CDK1, supporting the induction of G2 phase arrest detected by flow cytometry. Meanwhile, our study also showed activation of caspase-9 and caspase-3 and proteolytic cleavage of PARP in these cells, which play central roles during cell apoptosis [34, 35].
Over the past two decades, cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy regimens, such as CMV (cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastin) or M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) have been mainly used for patients with advanced bladder cancer [36–39]. However, because of their severe systemic toxicity and the poor overall prognosis of patients, novel therapeutic schemes containing different drug cocktails have been developed, with cisplatin occupying a central position in theseregimen (for example the GC (gemcitabine + cisplatin) regimen) . It is generally accepted that DNA is the preferential and cytotoxic target for cisplatin [41–43]. Cisplatin-mediated damage of genomic DNA causes severe cell cycle perturbation and arrest at certain checkpoints, and in the absence of adequate repair, the affected cells undergo cell apoptosis. There has been controversy about the influence of mutant p53 on the responsiveness to the cisplatin-based systemic chemotherapy in bladder cancer . Several studies have reported that patients with p53-altered bladder cancer benefited from adjuvant chemotherapy , whereas wild-type p53 was related to a poor response to systemic cisplatin-based chemotherapy , which might be related to the protection of cells from DNA damage by wild-type p53. However, other studies showed that mutations in TP53 were associated with drug resistance in several malignancies and cell lines [22, 46], which might be partially attributable to transcriptional activation of the multi-drug resistance 1 (MDR1) gene [47, 48] and interference with apoptosis  by mutant p53. Therefore, targeting mutant p53 may sensitize the cancer cells to chemotherapy in at least some bladder cancers. In the current study, we found that knockdown of mutant p53 by siRNA in 5637 and T24 bladder cancer cells could co-operate with cisplatin and enhance its anticancer effects additively via increased cell apoptosis.
Our study indicated that knockdown of mutant p53 by siRNA was able to induce G2-phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in 5637 and T24 human bladder cancer cells. Moreover, this strategy cooperated with cisplatin in the inhibition of bladder cancer cells. Our results provide evidence that targeting mutant p53 by RNAi may serve as a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of partial advanced bladder cancer bearing p53 mutations. Despite the promise, the principal challenges that remain in achieving the broadest application of RNAi therapeutics are the hurdles of delivery and target validation in vivo. Further studies are needed to delineate the exact mechanism and verify in vivo effectiveness for clinical use in the future.
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81101718) and the National Key Clinical Specialty Construction Project of China.
- Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012, 62: 10-29. 10.3322/caac.20138.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grossman HB, Natale RB, Tangen CM, Speights VO, Vogelzang NJ, Trump DL, deVere White RW, Sarosdy MF, Wood DP, Raghavan D, Crawford ED: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003, 349: 859-866. 10.1056/NEJMoa022148.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Splinter TA, Scher HI, Denis L, Bukowski R, Simon S, Klimberg I, Soloway M, Vogelzang NJ, van Tinteren H, Herr H, European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer-Genitourinary Group: The prognostic value of the pathological response to combination chemotherapy before cystectomy in patients with invasive bladder cancer. J Urol. 1992, 147: 606-608.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stenzl A, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, Ribal MJ, Sherif A, Witjes JA, European Association of Urology (EAU): Treatment of muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: update of the EAU guidelines. Eur Urol. 2011, 59: 1009-1018. 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Green DR, Kroemer G: Cytoplasmic functions of the tumour suppressor p53. Nature. 2009, 458: 1127-1130. 10.1038/nature07986.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vousden KH, Prives C: Blinded by the light: the growing complexity of p53. Cell. 2009, 137: 413-431. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.037.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hollstein M, Sidransky D, Vogelstein B, Harris CC: p53 mutations in human cancers. Science. 1991, 253: 49-53. 10.1126/science.1905840.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vogelstein B, Lane D, Levine AJ: Surfing the p53 network. Nature. 2000, 408: 307-310. 10.1038/35042675.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kato S, Han SY, Liu W, Otsuka K, Shibata H, Kanamaru R, Ishioka C: Understanding the function-structure and function-mutation relationships of p53 tumor suppressor protein by high-resolution missense mutation analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 8424-8429. 10.1073/pnas.1431692100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Milner J, Medcalf EA, Cook AC: Tumor suppressor p53: analysis of wild-type and mutant p53 complexes. Mol Cell Biol. 1991, 11: 12-19.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Milner J, Medcalf EA: Cotranslation of activated mutant p53 with wild type drives the wild-type p53 protein into the mutant conformation. Cell. 1991, 65: 65-74. 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90408-Q.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oren M, Rotter V: Mutant p53 gain-of-function in cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010, 2: a001107-10.1101/cshperspect.a001107.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bossi G, Lapi E, Strano S, Rinaldo C, Blandino G, Sacchi A: Mutant p53 gain of function: reduction of tumor malignancy of human cancer cell lines through abrogation of mutant p53 expression. Oncogene. 2006, 25: 304-309.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bossi G, Marampon F, Maor-Aloni R, Zani B, Rotter V, Oren M, Strano S, Blandino G, Sacchi A: Conditional RNA interference in vivo to study mutant p53 oncogenic gain of function on tumor malignancy. Cell Cycle. 2008, 7: 1870-1879. 10.4161/cc.7.12.6161.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mitra AP, Datar RH, Cote RJ: Molecular pathways in invasive bladder cancer: New insights into mechanisms, progression, and target identification. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24: 5552-5564. 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.2073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bakkar AA, Wallerand H, Radvanyi F, Lahaye JB, Pissard S, Lecerf L, Kouyoumdjian JC, Abbou CC, Pairon JC, Jaurand MC, Thiery JP, Chopin DK, de Medina SG: FGFR3 and TP53 gene mutations define two distinct pathways in urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 8108-8112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nishiyama H, Watanabe J, Ogawa O: p53 and chemosensitivity in bladder cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008, 13: 282-286. 10.1007/s10147-008-0815-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cooper MJ, Haluschak JJ, Johnson D, Schwartz S, Morrison LJ, Lippa M, Hatzivassiliou G, Tan J: p53 mutations in bladder carcinoma cell lines. Oncol Res. 1994, 6: 569-579.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Riegerl KM, Little AF, Swart JM, Kastrinakis WV, Fitzgerald JM, Hess DT, Libertino JA, Summerhayes IC: Human bladder carcinoma cell lines as indicators of oncogenic change relevant to urothelial neoplastic progression. Br J Cancer. 1995, 72: 683-690. 10.1038/bjc.1995.394.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weisz L, Oren M, Rotter V: Transcription regulation by mutant p53. Oncogene. 2007, 26: 2202-2211. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210294.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Donzelli S, Biagioni F, Fausti F, Strano S, Fontemaggi G, Blandino G: Oncogenomic approaches in exploring gain of function of mutant p53. Curr Genomics. 2008, 9: 200-207. 10.2174/138920208784340713.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blandino G, Levine AJ, Oren M: Mutant p53 gain of function: differential effects of different p53 mutants on resistance of cultured cells to chemotherapy. Oncogene. 1999, 18: 477-485. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li R, Sutphin PD, Schwartz D, Matas D, Almog N, Wolkowicz R, Goldfinger N, Pei H, Prokocimer M, Rotter V: Mutant p53 protein expression interferes with p53-independent apoptotic pathways. Oncogene. 1998, 16: 3269-3277. 10.1038/sj.onc.1201867.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bergamaschi D, Gasco M, Hiller L, Sullivan A, Syed N, Trigiante G, Yulug I, Merlano M, Numico G, Comino A, Attard M, Reelfs O, Gusterson B, Bell AK, Heath V, Tavassoli M, Farrell PJ, Smith P, Lu X, Crook T: p53 polymorphism influences response in cancer chemotherapy via modulation of p73-dependent apoptosis. Cancer Cell. 2003, 3: 387-402. 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00079-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wolf D, Harris N, Rotter V: Reconstitution of p53 expression in a nonproducer Ab-MuLV-transformed cell line by transfection of a functional p53 gene. Cell. 1984, 38: 119-126. 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90532-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bumcrot D, Manoharan M, Koteliansky V, Sah DW: RNAi therapeutics: a potential new class of pharmaceutical drugs. Nat Chem Biol. 2006, 2: 711-719. 10.1038/nchembio839.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Castanotto D, Rossi JJ: The promises and pitfalls of RNA-interference-based therapeutics. Nature. 2009, 457: 426-433. 10.1038/nature07758.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ma LL, Sun WJ, Wang Z, Zh GY, Li P, Fu SB: Effects of silencing of mutant p53 gene in human lung adenocarcinoma cell line Anip973. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 25: 585-592.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhu H, Mao Q, Lin Y, Yang K, Xie L: RNA interference targeting mutant p53 inhibits growth and induces apoptosis in DU145 human prostate cancer cells. Med Oncol. 2011, 28 (Suppl 1): S381-S387.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whitfield ML, George LK, Grant GD, Perou CM: Common markers of proliferation. Nature Rev Cancer. 2006, 6: 99-106. 10.1038/nrc1802.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vikhanskaya F, Lee MK, Mazzoletti M, Broggini M, Sabapathy K: Cancer-derived p53 mutants suppress p53-target gene expression–potential mechanism for gain of function of mutant p53. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: 2093-2104. 10.1093/nar/gkm099.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pagano M, Pepperkok R, Verde F, Ansorge W, Draetta G: Cyclin A is required at two points in the human cell cycle. EMBO J. 1992, 11: 961-971.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Furuno N, den Elzen N, Pines J: Human cyclin A is required for mitosis until mid prophase. J Cell Biol. 1999, 147: 295-306. 10.1083/jcb.147.2.295.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Salvesen GS, Dixit VM: Caspase activation: the induced proximity model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 10964-10967. 10.1073/pnas.96.20.10964.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Germain M, Affar EB, D’Amours D, Dixit VM, Salvesen GS, Poirier GG: Cleavage of automodified poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase during apoptosis: evidence for involvement of caspase-7. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 28379-28384. 10.1074/jbc.274.40.28379.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lehmann J, Retz M, Stockle M: Chemotherapy in the post-MVAC era: the case for adjuvant chemotherapy. World J Urol. 2002, 20: 144-150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ardavanis A, Tryfonopoulos D, Alexopoulos A, Kandylis C, Lainakis G, Rigatos G: Gemcitabine and docetaxel as first-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma: a phase II study. Br J Cancer. 2005, 92: 645-650. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602378.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenberg JE, Carroll PR, Small EJ: Update on chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer. J Urology. 2005, 174: 14-20. 10.1097/01.ju.0000162039.38023.5f.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Theodore C, Geoffrois L, Vermorken JB, Caponigro F, Fiedler W, Chollet P, Ravaud A, Peters GJ, de Balincourt C, Lacombe D, Fumoleau P: Multicentre EORTC study 16997: feasibility and phase II trial of farnesyl transferase inhibitor & gemcitabine combination in salvage treatment of advanced urothelial tract cancers. Eur J Cancer. 2005, 41: 1150-1157. 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.02.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perabo FG, Muller SC: New agents for treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2007, 18: 835-843. 10.1093/annonc/mdl331.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rabik CA, Dolan ME: Molecular mechanisms of resistance and toxicity associated with platinating agents. Cancer Treat Rev. 2007, 33: 9-23. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2006.09.006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kelland L: The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007, 7: 573-584. 10.1038/nrc2167.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho YP, Au-Yeung SC, To KK: Platinum-based anticancer agents: innovative design strategies and biological perspectives. Med Res Rev. 2003, 23: 633-655. 10.1002/med.10038.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cote RJ, Esrig D, Groshen S, Jones PA, Skinner DG: P53 and treatment of bladder cancer. Nature. 1997, 385: 123-124.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Watanabe J, Nishiyama H, Okubo K, Takahashi T, Toda Y, Habuchi T, Kakehi Y, Tada M, Ogawa O: Clinical evaluation of p53 mutations in urothelial carcinoma by IHC and FASAY. Urology. 2004, 63: 989-993. 10.1016/j.urology.2003.11.031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu C, El-Deiry WS: Targeting p53 for enhanced radio- and chemo-sensitivity. Apoptosis. 2009, 14: 597-606. 10.1007/s10495-009-0330-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chin KV, Ueda K, Pastan I, Gottesman MM: Modulation of activity of the promoter of the human MDR1 gene by Ras and p53. Science. 1992, 255: 459-462. 10.1126/science.1346476.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bush JA, Li G: Cancer chemoresistance: the relationship between p53 and multidrug transporters. Int J Cancer. 2002, 98: 323-330. 10.1002/ijc.10226.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.