Recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap reconstruction for invasive breast cancer
© Liang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 11 January 2013
Accepted: 5 August 2013
Published: 14 August 2013
The aim of this study was to evaluate the recurrence pattern after skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) using transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap in patients with invasive breast cancer.
From 1995 to 2010, patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent SSM followed by IBR using TRAM flap were retrospectively reviewed. The pattern of the first recurrence event was recorded.
We identified 249 consecutive patients with invasive breast cancer, two-thirds of whom (67.1%) were diagnosed with stage II or stage III disease. During a median follow-up period of 53 months, three (1.2%) local, 13 (5.2%) regional, 34 (13.7%) distant, and five (2.0%) concurrent locoregional and distant recurrences were observed. The median time to recurrences was 26 months (range, 2 to 70 months) for all recurrences, 23 months (range, 2 to 64 months) for locoregional recurrences, and 26 months (range, 8 to 70 months) for distant recurrences. All local recurrent lesions were detectable by careful physical examination, and detection of local recurrence suggested the presence of distant metastasis (60.0%). In contrast to distant metastasis, the risk of locoregional recurrence did not increase significantly with an increase in disease stage. The 5-year overall, locoregional relapse-free, and distant relapse-free survival rates were 89.7%, 90.8%, and 81.6%, respectively.
SSM followed by immediate reconstruction using TRAM flap is an oncologically safe procedure even in patients with advanced-stage disease. Detection of local recurrence is crucial and can be aided by a thorough physical examination.
KeywordsInvasive breast cancer Skin-sparing mastectomy Immediate breast reconstruction Transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap Recurrence
Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) followed by immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) has become a common and widely used procedure for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and early-stage breast cancer . The oncological safety and superior cosmetic outcomes of this approach have been demonstrated in several studies [2, 3]. The use of this approach is still debated, however, and the implementation of SSM for advanced-stage disease has not been thoroughly investigated [4–6].
One of the major concerns regarding SSM and IBR is local recurrence [7, 8]. Inadequate skin excision after SSM may increase the theoretical risk of recurrence. Another concern is that IBR may obscure a recurrent lesion, thereby delaying its diagnosis and subsequent management [9, 10]. Furthermore, no clear consensus has been established regarding the ideal screening tool for reconstructed breast tissue . Unsurprisingly, therefore, some authors have speculated that the combination of SSM and IBR may result in inferior oncological outcomes, especially in patients with more advanced disease stages .
Among the various types of breast reconstruction, use of the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap is a popular choice for either immediate or delayed reconstruction . The flap transfers sufficient tissue to create a breast with excellent bulk and simultaneously provides an abdominoplasty. Use of the TRAM flap is thus the most common reconstruction method applied in our institution. Most published studies that investigated SSM and IBR enrolled patients using some degree of selection (either early-stage patients or advanced-stage patients were included), evaluated a small number of cases, and employed more than one type of reconstruction method [1, 11, 12]. The patients in the present study were relatively unselected and received only one type of reconstruction.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and pattern of recurrence in a broad spectrum of breast cancer patients regardless of the tumor stage after treatment with SSM and IBR with TRAM flap.
Between August 1995 and December 2010, data on all breast cancer patients who underwent SSM and IBR using TRAM flap at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. In total, 335 patients were treated during this period. Patients with local recurrence following previous lumpectomy or mastectomy for prophylaxis and those with a follow-up period < 2 years were excluded (n = 38). Patients with purely in situ disease were also excluded (n = 48). A total of 249 patients with invasive breast cancer were enrolled in this study. Diagnoses of all patients were pathologically confirmed, and the disease was staged according to the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system . Inform consent was obtained from all patients before operation. This study was approved by the institutional review board in Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
SSM was defined as removal of the whole breast tissue, the nipple–areola complex, the biopsy scar, and the skin overlying superficial tumors. The remaining native skin envelope and inframammary fold were preserved. Axillary lymph node dissection was subsequently performed via an axillary incision. All IBR procedures were performed using a pedicled TRAM flap. Patients were all counseled preoperatively regarding the types of mastectomy and reconstruction options. Risks and benefits of different methods were thoroughly explained.
Neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with an anthracycline-based regimen was considered for patients presenting with locally advanced disease. The number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy cycles depended upon individual clinical response and the surgeon’s discretion. Adjuvant chemotherapy was indicated for patients with positive lymph node status. Among patients without lymph node involvement, chemotherapy was considered for those with unfavorable prognostic features such as negative estrogen receptor status, HER-2 overexpression, high histologic grade, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and large tumor size. Treatment was commenced once patients recovered from surgery. Anthracycline-based regimens alone or anthracycline-based regimens followed by taxane-based regimens were the two most common protocols.
In all cases, radiation was delivered postoperatively and after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. The general indications for postmastectomy radiotherapy included skin involvement, positive lymph node status, and tumor size >5 cm. The radiation field included the ipsilateral chest wall, the internal mammary chain, and the supraclavicular fossa. Patients with positive hormone receptor status received appropriate hormone therapy, usually tamoxifen after surgery or completion of adjuvant chemotherapy.
Follow-up and outcome
The follow-up period was calculated from the date of SSM to the date of last patient contact. Local recurrence was defined as a biopsy-proven recurrent tumor within the ipsilateral anterior chest wall, including the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and muscle. Regional recurrence was defined as tumor involvement of ipsilateral axillary, internal mammary, supraclavicular, or infraclavicular lymph nodes. Recurrence at all other locations was classified as distant metastases.
Patients were regularly followed-up every 3 to 6 months for the first 5 years and every 12 months thereafter. Reconstructed breasts were routinely checked by physical examination and sonography. Annual mammography was performed on the contralateral healthy breast. Abnormal clinical findings might be evaluated by further studies, including chest radiographs, sonography for liver, bone scan, and tumor markers (CA-153 and carcinoembryonic antigen).
Disease-free survival and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences were compared using the log-rank test. Factors that possibly related to locoregional recurrence, including age, histologic grade, tumor size, lymph node status, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, and hormone receptor status, were analyzed by univariate comparison. Subsequent multivariate analysis was not performed because of the small sample size. All analyses were performed using Statistical Program for Social Sciences (SPSS 18.0 for Windows; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P < 0.05 was considered significant.
41 (22 to 62)
Tumor size (cm)
2.2 (0.1 to 11)
Lymph node status
Sixteen patients (6.4%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with two to five cycles of 5-fluorouracil, anthracycline, and cyclophosphamide (median, four cycles). One hundred and ninety-six patients (78.7%) were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy using anthracycline-based and/or taxane-based regimens after surgery. The median time from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy was 31 days (range, 14 to 100 days). In only eight patients did this time interval exceed 60 days. Additional adjuvant radiotherapy was administered to 32 patients (12.9%) after the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy. The indication for radiation was lymph node metastasis and/or large tumor size. One-half of the patients (50.6%) received hormone therapy. Tamoxifen was administered to all these patients, except for seven premenopausal patients who received gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues.
Pattern of first breast cancer recurrence stratified by stage
LR + D
Total, n (%)
Of the three patients with isolated local recurrence, all recurrent lesions were detectable by palpation, despite the small tumor size (0.8 to 2.2 cm in diameter). Diagnosis was established by either needle cytology or excision biopsy. Wide excision was subsequently performed followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Primary skin closure could be accomplished in all cases without the use of an additional flap or graft. TRAM flap removal was not required during the resection of these recurrent lesions. No further recurrence was detected in two patients. However, the other patient experienced multiple liver and bone metastases 26 months after the first relapse. The 13 patients with regional lymph node recurrence alone underwent lymph node dissection followed by additional chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. No further recurrence occurred in 10 patients. In contrast, three patients subsequently developed another recurrence 8, 10, and 56 months after the first relapse. In total, all but one patient (15/16, 93.8%) with locoregional recurrence as the first recurrence event were alive at the end of the follow-up period.
Twenty-six patients (10.4%) died during the follow-up period, and all deaths were due to progression of metastatic disease. Distant recurrence was the first recurrent event in all of these patients except for one, in whom ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node involvement alone was the first recurrence event. The average time to death after first recurrence was 25 months (range, 1 to 75 months), and 16 patients (61.5%) died within 2 years. The 5-year overall, locoregional relapse-free, and distant relapse-free survival rates were 89.7%, 90.8%, and 81.6%, respectively.
This study included 249 consecutive patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent SSM and IBR using pedicled TRAM flap. The avoidance of patient selection and the use of only one type of reconstruction method and a standardized management protocol may provide a more thorough perspective on this treatment approach.
One concern regarding immediate reconstruction is whether it hinders or delays the detection of local recurrence . All five local recurrences (three local alone and two concurrent local and systemic) that developed in our series were detectable by physical examination even in cases of recurrent tumor size <1 cm in diameter. This result is consistent with two other series in which all three and five of six local recurrences, respectively, were detectable by physical examination [9, 15]. Of 16 local recurrences after immediate TRAM flap reconstruction reported by Howard and colleagues , all were identified by physical examination or subjective symptoms that were subsequently confirmed by physical examination or imaging studies. Our experience also highlights the importance of physical examination, because the presence of local recurrence may herald systemic metastasis either synchronously or metachronously. Three patients with local recurrences (3/5, 60.0%) developed distant metastasis in our series.
In addition to physical examination, we routinely use sonography for screening the reconstructed breast. The ideal modalities for recurrence surveillance in this population have not yet been determined. Some authors recommended routine mammography and have used it as an aid in the differentiation between fat necrosis and cancer. However, these two different lesions cannot always be distinguished solely on the basis of mammographic findings [9, 16]. Pathological diagnosis remains the gold standard, and biopsy is warranted for any new or persistent lesion in the reconstructed breast.
The reported local recurrence rates after SSM and IBR in studies with more than 100 patients range from 0.2 to 7.0% [17, 18]. When limiting the study population to patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing the same procedure, the reported rates of local recurrence are between 1 and 10% [6, 11, 19]. The local recurrence rate for stage III patients (2/37, 5.5%) in our study is comparable with that reported previously [6, 11, 19]. Despite the relatively small number of patients with stage III disease in this series, our findings might strengthen the rational use of SSM and immediate TRAM flap reconstruction in patients with advanced-stage disease. A larger study with more patients is warranted to further address this issue. Several studies have reported no significant difference in recurrence pattern or incidence between patients undergoing SSM and conventional mastectomy [17, 20]. Comparable results have also been observed for patients with stage III disease .
The median time to locoregional recurrence was 23 months, 3 months shorter than that to distant relapse, in our study. This finding is comparable with previously reported results [10, 21]. In a series of 1,392 breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy, Crowe and colleagues found that locoregional recurrence occurred within the first 3 years in most cases, with a peak in the second year . The recurrence rate then dropped sharply and remained relatively constant over a long period of time. However, recurrence occurring 10 years after mastectomy has been reported, and a longer follow-up time is warranted .
The rate of distant recurrence was significantly higher in patients with advanced-stage disease, and distant metastasis was the cause of all deaths that occurred in our series. Despite multimodal treatment, > 60% of patients died within 2 years after first distant relapse. In contrast to the distant metastasis rate, the locoregional recurrence rate did not increase significantly from stage I disease to stage III disease. This difference may be ascribed to the aggressive use of systemic therapy in this study.
In recent years, a trend of decreased local recurrence rate has been observed . Some authors considered this decline attributable, at least in part, to the increasing use of adjuvant therapy . Our result may further support the effectiveness of systemic treatment in reducing the risk of locoregional recurrence and narrowing the gap in outcome between different stages. Nevertheless, such intensive adjuvant therapy can pose a heavy financial burden to patients. In Taiwan, most of the cancer treatment cost is covered by national health insurance. Thus, this type of treatment was affordable for the majority of patients in this series.
Based on our results, solitary local or regional recurrence as the first recurrence event was associated with a better prognosis than the development of locoregional recurrence as part of systemic metastasis. Differentiation between different recurrence patterns may thus be of great help in predicting prognosis, and a thorough metastatic survey at the time of the first recurrence is warranted. Recently, the use of nipple-sparing mastectomy has been on the rise, although its clinical application is usually limited to prophylactic risk reduction and ductal carcinoma in situ. The oncologic safety of this procedure remains the major concern that hampers its application. Our results may further support the possible implementation of nipple-sparing mastectomy for cases of advanced disease.
Our study showed that SSM followed by IBR using TRAM flap was an oncologically safe procedure. The locoregional recurrence rate was acceptable even in cases of advanced-stage disease. The TRAM flap did not hinder the detection of recurrence. The first course of postoperative chemotherapy could be delivered without delay. In conjunction with adjuvant treatment, this procedure can be applicable to advanced-stage disease.
Immediate breast reconstruction
Transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous.
- Omranipour R, Bobin JY, Esouyeh M: Skin sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction (SSMIR) for early breast cancer: eight years single institution experience. World J Surg Oncol. 2008, 6: 43-10.1186/1477-7819-6-43.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spiegel AJ, Butler CE: Recurrence following treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003, 111: 706-711. 10.1097/01.PRS.0000041440.12442.05.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kinoshita S, Nojima K, Takeishi M, Imawari Y, Kyoda S, Hirano A, Akiba T, Kobayashi S, Takeyama H, Uchida K, Morikawa T: Retrospective comparison of non-skin-sparing mastectomy and skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Int J Surg Oncol. 2011, 2011: 876520-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prabhu R, Godette K, Carlson G, Losken A, Gabram S, Fasola C, O'Regan R, Zelnak A, Torres M: The impact of skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction in patients with stage III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and postmastectomy radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012, 82: e587-e593. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Foster RD, Esserman LJ, Anthony JP, Hwang ES, Do H: Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective cohort study for the treatment of advanced stages of breast carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002, 9: 462-466. 10.1007/BF02557269.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho AL, Tyldesley S, Macadam SA, Lennox PA: Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction in locally advanced breast cancer patients: a UBC perspective. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012, 19: 892-900. 10.1245/s10434-011-1989-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lim W, Ko BS, Kim HJ, Lee JW, Eom JS, Son BH, Lee TJ, Ahn SH: Oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy followed by immediate reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2010, 102: 39-42. 10.1002/jso.21573.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Medina-Franco H, Vasconez LO, Fix RJ, Heslin MJ, Beenken SW, Bland KI, Urist MM: Factors associated with local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2002, 235: 814-819. 10.1097/00000658-200206000-00008.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shaikh N, LaTrenta G, Swistel A, Osborne FM: Detection of recurrent breast cancer after TRAM flap reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2001, 47: 602-607. 10.1097/00000637-200112000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Howard MA, Polo K, Pusic AL, Cordeiro PG, Hidalgo DA, Mehrara B, Disa JJ: Breast cancer local recurrence after mastectomy and TRAM flap reconstruction: incidence and treatment options. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006, 117: 1381-1386. 10.1097/01.prs.0000208116.86765.4a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Downes KJ, Glatt BS, Kanchwala SK, Mick R, Fraker DL, Fox KR, Solin LJ, Bucky LP, Czerniecki BJ: Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction is an acceptable treatment option for patients with high-risk breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2005, 103: 906-913. 10.1002/cncr.20851.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Styblo TM, Lewis MM, Carlson GW, Murray DR, Wood WC, Lawson D, Landry J, Hughes L, Nahai F, Bostwick J: Immediate breast reconstruction for stage III breast cancer using transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap. Ann Surg Oncol. 1996, 3: 375-380. 10.1007/BF02305667.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 2010, New York: Springer, 7Google Scholar
- Patel RT, Webster DJ, Mansel RE, Hughes LE: Is immediate postmastectomy reconstruction safe in the long-term?. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1993, 19: 372-375.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Helvie MA, Wilson TE, Roubidoux MA, Wilkins EG, Chang AE: Mammographic appearance of recurrent breast carcinoma in six patients with TRAM flap breast reconstructions. Radiology. 1998, 209: 711-715.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mund DF, Wolfson P, Gorczyca DP, Fu YS, Love SM, Bassett LW: Mammographically detected recurrent nonpalpable carcinoma developing in a transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous flap. A case report. Cancer. 1994, 74: 2804-2807. 10.1002/1097-0142(19941115)74:10<2804::AID-CNCR2820741010>3.0.CO;2-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yi M, Kronowitz SJ, Meric-Bernstam F, Feig BW, Symmans WF, Lucci A, Ross MI, Babiera GV, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK: Local, regional, and systemic recurrence rates in patients undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy compared with conventional mastectomy. Cancer. 2011, 117: 916-924. 10.1002/cncr.25505.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kroll SS, Khoo A, Singletary SE, Ames FC, Wang BG, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Evans GR, Robb GL: Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing and conventional mastectomy: a 6-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999, 104: 421-425. 10.1097/00006534-199908000-00015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Foster RD, Hansen SL, Esserman LJ, Hwang ES, Ewing C, Lane K, Anthony JP: Safety of immediate transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous breast reconstruction for patients with locally advanced disease. Arch Surg. 2005, 140: 196-198. 10.1001/archsurg.140.2.196. discussion 199–200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lanitis S, Tekkis PP, Sgourakis G, Dimopoulos N, Al Mufti R, Hadjiminas DJ: Comparison of skin-sparing mastectomy versus non-skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Surg. 2010, 251: 632-639. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d35bf8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Romics L, Chew BK, Weiler-Mithoff E, Doughty JC, Brown IM, Stallard S, Wilson CR, Mallon EA, George WD: Ten-year follow-up of skin-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg. 2012, 99: 799-806. 10.1002/bjs.8704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crowe JP, Gordon NH, Antunez AR, Shenk RR, Hubay CA, Shuck JM: Local–regional breast cancer recurrence following mastectomy. Arch Surg. 1991, 126: 429-432. 10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410280027002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Alcantara FP, Capko D, Barry JM, Morrow M, Pusic A, Sacchini VS: Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011, 18: 3117-3122. 10.1245/s10434-011-1974-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.