Open Access

Visceral fat changes after distal gastrectomy according to type of reconstruction procedure for gastric cancer

  • Koji Tanaka1Email author,
  • Isao Miyashiro1,
  • Masahiko Yano1,
  • Kentaro Kishi1,
  • Masaaki Motoori1,
  • Tatsushi Shingai1,
  • Shingo Noura1,
  • Masayuki Ohue1,
  • Hiroaki Ohigashi1 and
  • Osamu Ishikawa1
World Journal of Surgical Oncology201311:146

DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-146

Received: 11 January 2013

Accepted: 12 May 2013

Published: 21 June 2013

Abstract

Background

Noncancerous causes of death, such as cerebrovascular or cardiac disease, are not rare in patients with gastric cancer who had undergone curative gastrectomy. Metabolic syndrome, characterized by visceral fat accumulation, is a risk factor for cerebrovascular and cardiac diseases. However, there is limited information on the effects of reconstruction procedures on changes in visceral fat after distal gastrectomy. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of the reconstruction procedure (Roux-en-Y reconstruction (RY) and Billroth I reconstruction (BI)) on changes in visceral fat, as determined using computed tomography.

Methods

The study subjects were 152 patients with gastric cancer who underwent distal gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy between 2002 and 2007. The visceral fat area was measured for one cross-sectional computed tomogram obtained at the level of the umbilicus.

Results

Adjuvant chemotherapy (yes vs. no, P = 0.0006), type of reconstruction (BI vs. RY, P = 0.0146), field of lymph node dissection (<D2 vs. ≥D2, P = 0.0020), omentectomy (yes vs. no, P = 0.0003), and pathological stage (1/2 vs. 3/4; P = 0.0023) correlated significantly with postoperative visceral fat loss. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified reconstruction (BI vs. RY; P = 0.0232) and adjuvant chemotherapy (yes vs. no, P = 0.0330) as the significant determinants of visceral fat loss after surgery.

Conclusions

Visceral fat loss after RY was larger than that after BI. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the effects of reconstruction after distal gastrectomy on visceral fat.

Keywords

Gastrectomy Reconstruction Visceral fat

Background

Noncancerous death is a common cause of death in patients with gastric cancer who had undergone curative gastrectomy. This is probably because the 5-year survival rate has improved to about 95%, especially in patients with early gastric cancer treated by radical resection [1]. The causes of noncancerous deaths include cerebrovascular, cardiac, and respiratory diseases [2]. The metabolic syndrome, characterized by visceral fat accumulation, is a risk factor for cerebrovascular and cardiac diseases [35]. The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is a popular procedure used to reduce body weight, and visceral fat, in morbidly obese subjects. Although Roux-en-Y (RY) gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y reconstruction after gastrectomy for gastric cancer are not entirely similar, the selection of reconstruction method could control visceral fat after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Several studies have reported poor prognosis of patients with excess post-gastrectomy body weight loss [6, 7]. Body weight loss is a serious problem, especially for lean patients. Such weight loss is caused by impaired food intake and malabsorption [810] Body weight loss after gastrectomy is thought to be mainly due to loss of body fat (which includes subcutaneous and visceral fat) [1113]. In this regard, visceral fat change is worthy of remark. However, to our knowledge, there is no information on changes in visceral fat and subcutaneous fat distribution after gastrectomy for different surgical procedures, such as distal gastrectomy with Billroth I (DGBI) reconstruction or distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y (DGRY) reconstruction.

In this retrospective study, we first quantified the visceral fat area (VFA) and then determined the impact of different surgical procedures (DGBI and DGRY) on the visceral fat of patients who underwent distal gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy. Clinically, this study serves to provide a basis for appropriate selection of reconstruction method following distal gastrectomy, to provide adequate control of visceral fat volume postoperatively in the long-term.

Methods

Patients and surgical procedures

Between January 2002 and April 2007, a total of 152 patients with gastric cancer underwent distal gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy at the Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan. They included 106 men and 46 women with a mean age of 62.8 ± 9.8 years (±SD, range: 37 to 85 years; median: 63 years). All patients underwent preoperative assessment, including gastric endoscopy, computed tomography (CT) and laboratory tests. In this study, we compared the CT images taken at least 6 months after surgery with those before surgery.

Roux-en-Y reconstruction was performed when the remnant stomach after resection was too small to allow performance of BI or when the main tumor invaded the pylorus. Lymph node dissection was performed according to the second edition of the Japanese Classification of Gastric Cancer[14]. Specifically, patients with T1 and N0 tumors underwent dissection of the perigastric lymph nodes and nodes at the base of the left gastric artery, and along the common hepatic artery, which for simplicity is termed ‘D1+ lymph node dissection’ in this study. Patients with T2 or more advanced tumors and those with N1 or more advanced cancer underwent D2 lymph node dissection, which involves dissection of hepatoduodenal nodes and retropancreatic nodes.

Hospital records were reviewed for age, sex, height, body weight, clinicopathological background data regarding UICC-TNM stage, and surgical procedure. This study was approved by the Human Ethics Review Committee of the Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases.

Quantification of visceral fat area

The VFA was measured using ‘FatScan’, as described previously [15], on one cross-sectional CT image obtained at the level of the umbilicus. Figure 1 shows the method used to determine the fat tissue area on a CT image. First, the intraperitoneal area was defined manually by tracing its contour on the scan (Figure 1a). Thereafter, a region of interest of the subcutaneous fat layer was defined by tracing its contour on each scan, either automatically or manually (Figure 1b), and then the attenuation range of the CT numbers (in Hounsfield units) for the fat tissue was calculated. A histogram for the fat tissue was computed, based on the mean attenuation ± 2 SD (Figure 1c). Within the region outlined in Figure 1a, the tissue with attenuation within the mean ± 2 SD was considered to be the VFA (white arrow, Figure 1d). The total fat area was calculated in the region outlining the circumference of the abdominal wall. The VFA was subtracted and the remainder was regarded as the subcutaneous fat area (black arrow) (Figure 1d).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1477-7819-11-146/MediaObjects/12957_2013_Article_1339_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

CT images obtained at the navel level demonstrating the method used to determine abdominal fat distribution. (a) The line (arrowed) outlines the intraperitoneal area. (b) The line (arrowed), drawn with a cursor automatically or manually, outlines the subcutaneous fat layer, in which attenuation is measured. (c) A histogram of the CT numbers (in Hounsfield units) in the area outlined in b (mean ± 2 SD). (d) Measurement of visceral fat tissue (solid arrow). The total fat area is represented by the region outlined by the circumference of the abdominal wall. The visceral fat area was subtracted, and the remainder was regarded as the subcutaneous fat area (dotted arrow).

Statistical analysis

Differences between groups were examined for statistical significance using the Student’s t test with Yates’ correction, the χ2 test, Fisher’s exact probability test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, or the Mann-Whitney U test. Univariate analysis was performed to identify the factors that determined visceral fat loss. The identified variables were subsequently entered into a multivariate analysis using logistic regression analysis to identify independent factors that influenced the visceral fat loss. Significance was assumed for P < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP version 9.0 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).

Results

Comparison of patients’ characteristics according to surgical procedure

Table 1 compares the background characteristics of patients who underwent DGBI and DGRY. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and VFA before surgery were not different among the groups. At baseline, the serum albumin concentration was significantly higher in the DGBI (4.25 ± 0.36 mg/dl) than in the DGRY group (4.11 ± 0.36 mg/dl, P = 0.0317).
Table 1

Comparison of clinical background data of patients who underwent distal gastrectomy-Billroth I and distal gastrectomy-Roux-en-Y

 

DGBI n= 104

DGRY n= 48

P

Age (years)

64 (38 to 85)

62.5 (37 to 80)

0.2574c

Sex (M/F)

69/35

37/11

0.1804a

BMI (kg/m2) before surgery

22.8 (16.0 to 30.5)

22.4 (17.1 to 31.0)

0.7243c

VFA before surgery (cm2)

75.2 (15.9 to 265.4)

80.6 (14.6 to 236.7)

0.9148c

SFA before surgery (cm2)

122.5 (35.5 to 267.3)

113.8 (14.9 to 231.5)

0.4142c

Albumin level before surgery (mg/dl)

4.3 (2.5 to 4.8)

4.1 (2.8 to 4.7)

0.0128c

Approach (laparoscopy/laparotomy)

15/89

0/48

0.0030b

Lymph node dissection (<D2/≥D2)

59/45

20/28

0.0840a

Omentectomy (yes/no)

13/91

15/33

0.0056a

Pathological T (1/2/3/4)

74/28/2/0

32/12/4/0

0.4420d

Pathological N (0/1/2/3)

78/20/6/0

34/10/3/1

0.5484d

Pathological stage (1/2/3/4)

86/11/7/0

37/5/5/1

0.3587d

Adjuvant chemotherapy (yes/no)

10/94

5/43

1.0000b

Recurrence (yes/no)

4/100

3/45

0.5110b

aχ2 test; bFisher’s exact test; cWilcoxon rank sum test; dMann-Whitney U test. BMI body mass index, DGBI distal gastrectomy with Billroth I, DGRY distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y, SFA subcutaneous fat area, VFA visceral fat area.

With regard to the surgical factors, there was a significant difference in surgical approach (that is, the proportion of patients who underwent laparoscopy versus laparotomy) between the DGBI and DGRY groups (P = 0.0030), and in omentectomy between the DGBI and DGRY groups (P = 0.0056).

Analysis of the pathological factors and postoperative clinical course showed that there was no significant difference between the groups in pathological T, pathological N, pathological stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, or recurrence.

Comparison of BMI and VFA according to surgical procedure

Table 2 lists comparative data related to BMI and VFA: BMI after surgery and the rate of reduction of BMI (ΔBMI%) were not different between the DGBI and DGRY groups.
Table 2

Comparison of indexes of adiposity among patients with distal gastrectomy-Billroth I and distal gastrectomy-Roux-en-Y

 

DGBI n= 104

DGRY n= 48

P

BMI after surgery

20.4 (15.0 to 28.1)

19.7 (16.9 to 26.2)

0.3789a

VFA after surgery (cm2)

50.8 (6.4 to 167.1)

37.4 (11.7 to 144.5)

0.0742a

SFA after surgery (cm2)

81.14 (19 to 230.8)

69.9 (23.5 to 184)

0.0808a

Alb after surgery (mg/dl)

4.3 (2.4 to 4.7)

4.2 (3.7 to 4.6)

0.3065a

Reduction rate of BMI (%)

8.7 (−15 to 31.2)

10.8 (−2.7 to 22.5)

0.1678a

Reduction rate of VFA (%)

30.6 (−130.2 to 90.1)

44.2 (−14.5 to 85.2)

0.0027a

Reduction rate of SFA (%)

33.0 (−124.6 to 82.3)

31.8 (−147.7 to 87.4)

0.5722a

aWilcoxon rank sum test. BMI body mass index, DGBI distal gastrectomy with Billroth I, DGRY distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y, SFA subcutaneous fat area, VFA visceral fat area.

The VFA after DGBI (62.4 ± 39.8 cm2) was lower than that after DGRY (50.7 ± 36.2 cm2), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.0742).

The rate of reduction of the VFA (ΔVFA%) in the DGBI group (24.7 ± 36.8%) was significantly lower than in the DGRY group (42.2 ± 24.1%, P = 0.0027). We also examined ΔVFA% in pathological stage I patients. The ΔVFA% in the DGBI group (21.7 ± 38.1%) was significantly lower than in the DGRY group (39.0 ± 24.4%, P = 0.0134).

Determinants of postoperative visceral fat loss

We examined the factors involved in visceral fat loss. For this purpose, the study population was divided into a ‘high VFA loss group’ and a ‘low VFA loss group’ using the value of the median ΔVFA%, which was 36.1%. As shown in Table 3, among the clinicopathological factors examined, adjuvant chemotherapy (yes vs. no, P = 0.0006), type of reconstruction (BI vs. RY, P = 0146), field of lymph node dissection (<D2 vs. ≥D2, P = 0.0020), omentectomy (yes vs. no, P = 0.0003), and pathological stage (1/2 vs. 3/4; P = 0.0023) correlated significantly with postoperative visceral fat loss. Multivariate logistic regression analysis that included these factors identified reconstruction (BI vs. RY; P = 0.0232) and adjuvant chemotherapy (yes vs. no, P = 0.0330) as the significant determinants of visceral fat loss (Table 4).
Table 3

Results of univariate analysis for visceral fat loss after gastrectomy

Univariate analysis

High VFA loss group

Low VFA loss group

P

Sex (M/F)

53/23

53/23

1.0000a

Adjuvant chemotherapy (yes/no)

14/62

1/75

0.0006b

Reconstruction (BI/RY)

45/31

59/17

0.0146a

Lymph node dissection (<D2/≥D2)

30/46

49/27

0.0020a

Pathological stage (1 to 2 / 3 to 4)

64/12

75/1

0.0023b

Omentectomy (yes/no)

23/53

5/71

0.0003b

Surgical approach (laparoscopy/laparotomy)

4/72

11/65

0.1002b

aχ2 test; bFisher’s exact test; BI Billroth I, RY Roux-en-Y, VFA, visceral fat area.

Table 4

Results of multivariate analysis for visceral fat loss after gastrectomy

Multivariate analysis

Hazard ratio

95% confidence interval

P

Adjuvant chemotherapy (yes/no)

5.0290

1.1347 to 28.3460

0.0330

Reconstruction (BI/RY)

0.4249

0.1965 to 0.8909

0.0232

Lymph node dissection (<D2/≥D2)

0.9539

0.4482 to 2.0343

0.9022

Pathological stage (1 to 2/3 to 4)

0.4142

0.0723 to 2.0248

0.2774

Omentectomy (yes/no)

0.4862

0.1364 to 1.5993

0.2387

BI Billroth I, RY Roux-en-Y.

Discussion

It is reported that body weight loss is mainly caused by loss of body fat [12]. However, the effects of gastrectomy procedures on postoperative visceral fat have not been thoroughly examined. In this study, we analyzed the effect of surgical procedure on VFA. In the early postoperative period, fat volumes are seriously affected by the metabolic abnormality caused by surgery. Previous studies indicated that body weight loss occurs mainly during the first 3 months after surgery [11]. Therefore, in this study, we compared CT images taken at least 6 months after surgery, when the nutritional status is presumed to be stable [16].

A few studies examined changes in total fat or visceral fat after gastrectomy. Liedman et al. [12] studied changes in body composition by measuring total body potassium and water in 75 patients with gastric cancer. They observed a significant decrease in total body fat at 6 months after surgery but a subsequent marginal recovery at 12 months. In another study, Kiyama et al. [13] evaluated fat mass by multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis before and after gastrectomy. They found a larger decrease in body fat mass after TG than after subtotal gastrectomy and laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy. Yoon et al. [17] reported a greater loss of visceral fat tissue after TG than after subtotal gastrectomy at 6 months after surgery. At 12 months after surgery, the losses in BMI, total adipose tissue, subcutaneous, and visceral fat tissues were all greater after TG than after subtotal gastrectomy. Miyato et al.[16] reported that postoperative visceral fat of the RY group tended to be smaller than that of the BI group, although the difference was not statistically significant, perhaps because of the small sample size. Based on these differences, there is a possibility that the reconstruction procedure might have some effects on VFA.

The reasons for the differences in visceral fat reduction between BI and RY could not be elucidated in this retrospective study. Previous studies on bariatric surgery are of some help. It is reported that visceral fat reduction was greater after RY gastric bypass than after vertical banded gastroplasty [18]. Although the mechanisms of fat reduction or improvement in insulin resistance are not completely understood in bariatric surgery, the importance of gut hormones has been reported. Among the various gut hormones, gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) are reported to regulate fat metabolism. GIP is released from the duodenal endocrine K cells immediately after the absorption of fat or glucose [19]. Furthermore, fat intake induces hypersecretion of GIP, which increases nutrient uptake and triglyceride accumulation in adipocytes [20]. In the context of this study, Korner et al. [21] reported lower GIP levels after RY gastric bypass than after adjustable gastric banding, and concluded that the blunted GIP secretion after RY seems to contribute to the greater weight loss and improved glucose homeostasis compared with adjustable gastric banding. GLP-1 is a naturally occurring incretin hormone with a potent blood-glucose lowering action only during hyperglycemia; a GLP-1 analogue reduces visceral fat [22]. Peterli et al. [23] reported higher GLP-1 levels after RY gastric bypass than after sleeve gastrectomy. The GIP level might also be lower and the GLP-1 level might be higher after RY than BI, and fat accumulation is lower after RY than BI. Fat malabsorption might be another reason; since clinical tests after RY showed significantly lower fat absorption than after BI and double-tract reconstruction, which accommodated for the passage of food through the duodenum [24].

As for omentectomy, our data showed that it was not a significant determinant of visceral fat loss by multivariate analysis. There are some reports of surgical removal of visceral fat thorough omentectomy [25, 26]. There was no significant difference between RY gastric bypass without omentectomy and with omentectomy in fat mass 12 months after surgery [25]; this is compatible with our result.

These results might be helpful in selecting the reconstruction method used after distal gastrectomy, especially for obese patients when remnant stomachs are large enough so that either BI or RY could be performed. However, our study has several limitations. First, a retrospective sample was used in this analysis, and thus the clinical background, such as extent of lymph node dissection, omentectomy, and surgical approach, is different between compared groups, although these factors did not correlate with visceral fat loss in this study. Next, the size of remnant stomach, which could affect the amount of food intake after surgery, might be smaller after RY than after BI, because the former construction technique was often selected when the remnant stomach was too small to allow for anastomosis with the duodenum. Third, the long-term results are unknown, because we examined CT data only 1 year after surgery.

Further prospective studies with stratified randomization and long-term follow-up data, such as VFA after 3 years or 5 years and cause of death, are needed to confirm the effects of reconstruction after gastrectomy on visceral fat.

Conclusions

Visceral fat loss after RY was larger than that after BI. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the effects of reconstruction after distal gastrectomy on visceral fat.

Abbreviations

BI: 

Billroth I

BMI: 

Body mass index

CT: 

Computed tomography

DGBI: 

Distal gastrectomy with Billroth I

DGRY: 

Distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y

GIP: 

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide

GLP-1: 

Glucagon-like peptide-1

RY: 

Roux-en-Y

SD: 

Standard deviation

VFA: 

Visceral fat area.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases

References

  1. Isobe Y, Nashimoto A, Akazawa K, Oda I, Hayashi K, Miyashiro I, Katai H, Tsujitani S, Kodera Y, Seto Y, Kaminishi M: Gastric cancer treatment in Japan: 2008 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer. 2011, 14: 301-316. 10.1007/s10120-011-0085-6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  2. Kunisaki C, Akiyama H, Nomura M, Matsuda G, Otsuka Y, Ono H, Nagahori Y, Hosoi H, Takahashi M, Kito F, Shimada H: Significance of long-term follow-up of early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006, 13: 363-369. 10.1245/ASO.2006.03.061.View ArticlePubMed
  3. Fujioka S, Matsuzawa Y, Tokunaga K, Tarui S: Contribution of intra-abdominal fat accumulation to the impairment of glucose and lipid metabolism in human obesity. Metabolism. 1987, 36: 54-59. 10.1016/0026-0495(87)90063-1.View ArticlePubMed
  4. Fujimoto WY, Newell-Morris LL, Grote M, Bergstrom RW, Shuman WP: Visceral fat obesity and morbidity: NIDDM and atherogenic risk in Japanese American men and women. Int J Obes. 1991, 15 (Suppl 2): 41-44.PubMed
  5. Marcus MA, Murphy L, Pi-Sunyer FX, Albu JB: Insulin sensitivity and serum triglyceride level in obese white and black women: relationship to visceral and truncal subcutaneous fat. Metabolism. 1999, 48: 194-199. 10.1016/S0026-0495(99)90033-1.View ArticlePubMed
  6. Lee SE, Lee JH, Ryu KW, Nam B, Kim CG, Park SR, Kook MC, Kim YW: Changing pattern of postoperative body weight and its association with recurrence and survival after curative resection for gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012, 59: 430-435.View ArticlePubMed
  7. Moriwaki Y, Kunisaki C, Kobayashi S, Harada H, Imai S, Kasaoka C: Does body mass index (BMI) influence morbidity and long-term survival in gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy?. Hepatogastroenterology. 2003, 50: 284-288.PubMed
  8. Armbrecht U, Lundell L, Lindstedt G, Stockbruegger RW: Causes of malabsorption after total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Acta Chir Scand. 1988, 154: 37-41.PubMed
  9. Bradley EL, Isaacs J, Hersh T, Davidson ED, Millikan W: Nutritional consequences of total gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 1975, 182: 415-429. 10.1097/00000658-197510000-00007.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  10. Friess H, Bohm J, Muller MW, Glasbrenner B, Riepl RL, Malfertheiner P, Buchler MW: Maldigestion after total gastrectomy is associated with pancreatic insufficiency. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996, 91: 341-347.PubMed
  11. Adams JF: The clinical and metabolic consequences of total gastrectomy. I. Morbidity, weight, and nutrition. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1967, 2: 137-149. 10.3109/00365526709180059.View ArticlePubMed
  12. Liedman B, Andersson H, Bosaeus I, Hugosson I, Lundell L: Changes in body composition after gastrectomy: results of a controlled, prospective clinical trial. World J Surg. 1997, 21: 416-420. 10.1007/PL00012264. Discussion 420–421View ArticlePubMed
  13. Kiyama T, Mizutani T, Okuda T, Fujita I, Tokunaga A, Tajiri T, Barbul A: Postoperative changes in body composition after gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005, 9: 313-319. 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.11.008.View ArticlePubMed
  14. Japanese Gastric Cancer A: Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma - 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998, 1: 10-24.View Article
  15. Yoshizumi T, Nakamura T, Yamane M, Islam AH, Menju M, Yamasaki K, Arai T, Kotani K, Funahashi T, Yamashita S, Matsuzawa Y: Abdominal fat: standardized technique for measurement at CT. Radiology. 1999, 211: 283-286.View ArticlePubMed
  16. Miyato H, Kitayama J, Hidemura A, Ishigami H, Kaisaki S, Nagawa H: Vagus nerve preservation selectively restores visceral fat volume in patients with early gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy. J Surg Res. 2012, 173: 60-67. 10.1016/j.jss.2010.08.040.View ArticlePubMed
  17. Yoon DY, Kim HK, Kim JA, Choi CS, Yun EJ, Chang SK, Lee YJ, Park CH: Changes in the abdominal fat distribution after gastrectomy: computed tomography assessment. ANZ J Surg. 2007, 77: 121-125. 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03990.x.View ArticlePubMed
  18. Olbers T, Bjorkman S, Lindroos A, Maleckas A, Lonn L, Sjostrom L, Lonroth H: Body composition, dietary intake, and energy expenditure after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2006, 244: 715-722. 10.1097/01.sla.0000218085.25902.f8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  19. Falko JM, Crockett SE, Cataland S, Mazzaferri EL: Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) stimulated by fat ingestion in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1975, 41: 260-265. 10.1210/jcem-41-2-260.View ArticlePubMed
  20. Miyawaki K, Yamada Y, Ban N, Ihara Y, Tsukiyama K, Zhou H, Fujimoto S, Oku A, Tsuda K, Toyokuni S, Hiai H, Mizunoya W, Fushiki T, Holst JJ, Makino M, Tashita A, Kobara Y, Tsubamoto Y, Jinnouchi T, Jomori T, Seino Y: Inhibition of gastric inhibitory polypeptide signaling prevents obesity. Nat Med. 2002, 8: 738-742. 10.1038/nm727.View ArticlePubMed
  21. Korner J, Bessler M, Inabnet W, Taveras C, Holst JJ: Exaggerated glucagon-like peptide-1 and blunted glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide secretion are associated with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass but not adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007, 3: 597-601. 10.1016/j.soard.2007.08.004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  22. Jendle J, Nauck MA, Matthews DR, Frid A, Hermansen K, During M, Zdravkovic M, Strauss BJ, Garber AJ: Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009, 11: 1163-1172. 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01158.x.View ArticlePubMed
  23. Peterli R, Steinert RE, Woelnerhanssen B, Peters T, Christoffel-Courtin C, Gass M, Kern B, von Fluee M, Beglinger C: Metabolic and hormonal changes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a randomized, prospective trial. Obes Surg. 2012, 22: 740-748. 10.1007/s11695-012-0622-3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  24. Takase M, Sumiyama Y, Nagao J: Quantitative evaluation of reconstruction methods after gastrectomy using a new type of examination: digestion and absorption test with stable isotope 13C-labeled lipid compound. Gastric Cancer. 2003, 6: 134-141. 10.1007/s10120-003-0238-3.View ArticlePubMed
  25. Fabbrini E, Tamboli RA, Magkos F, Marks-Shulman PA, Eckhauser AW, Richards WO, Klein S, Abumrad NN: Surgical removal of omental fat does not improve insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular risk factors in obese adults. Gastroenterology. 2010, 139: 448-455. 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.04.056.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  26. Dillard TH, Purnell JQ, Smith MD, Raum W, Hong D, Laut J, Patterson EJ: Omentectomy added to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: a randomized, controlled trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013, 9: 269-275. 10.1016/j.soard.2011.09.027.View ArticlePubMed

Copyright

© Tanaka et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement